Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Centre for Oral Immunobiology & Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AD, UK.
Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14085. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114085.
The need to predict, diagnose and treat peri-implant diseases has never been greater. We present a systematic review of the literature on the changes in the expression of biomarkers in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) before and after treatment of peri-implantitis. Bacterial composition, clinical and radiographic parameters, and systemic biomarkers before and after treatment are reported as secondary outcomes. A total of 17 studies were included. Treatment groups were non-surgical treatment or surgical treatment, either alone or with adjunctive therapy. Our findings show that non-surgical treatment alone does not influence biomarker levels or clinical outcomes. Both adjunctive photodynamic therapy and local minocycline application resulted in a reduction of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-10 twelve months after treatment. Non-surgical treatments with adjunctive use of lasers or antimicrobials were more effective at improving the clinical outcomes in the short-term only. Access flap debridement led to matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 and tumour necrosis factor-α reduction twelve months post-surgery. Surgical debridement with adjunctive antimicrobials achieved a decrease in MMP-8 at three months. Adjunctive use of Emdogain (EMD) was associated with a reduction in 40 PICF proteins compared to access flap surgery alone. Surgical interventions were more effective at reducing probing pocket depth and bleeding on probing both in the short- and long-term. Surgical treatment in combination with EMD was found to be more effective in resolving inflammation up to twelve months.
预测、诊断和治疗种植体周围疾病的需求从未如此之大。我们对种植体周围炎治疗前后种植体周围龈沟液(PICF)中生物标志物表达变化的文献进行了系统评价。报告了治疗前后的细菌组成、临床和影像学参数以及系统生物标志物作为次要结局。共纳入 17 项研究。治疗组为单独的非手术治疗或手术治疗,或联合辅助治疗。我们的研究结果表明,单独的非手术治疗并不影响生物标志物水平或临床结果。辅助光动力疗法和局部米诺环素应用均可在治疗后 12 个月降低白细胞介素(IL)-1β和 IL-10 水平。联合使用激光或抗菌药物的非手术治疗在短期内更有效地改善临床结果。翻瓣清创术可在术后 12 个月降低基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)-8 和肿瘤坏死因子-α水平。联合使用抗菌药物的手术清创术可在 3 个月时降低 MMP-8 水平。与单独使用翻瓣术相比,使用 Emdogain(EMD)辅助治疗可使 40 种 PICF 蛋白减少。手术干预在短期内和长期内都更有效地降低探诊袋深度和探诊出血。发现手术联合 EMD 治疗在 12 个月内更有效地缓解炎症。