• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身体活动行为决定因素的定义:DE-PASS专家组的共识达成过程及结果

Definitions of determinants of physical activity behaviour: process and outcome of consensus from the DE-PASS expert group.

作者信息

Dygrýn Jan, Brazo-Sayavera Javier, Cruz Joana, Gebremariam Mekdes Kebede, Ribeiro José Carlos, Capranica Laura, MacDonncha Ciaran, Netz Yael

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Department of Sports and Computer Science, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Mar 18;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01728-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-025-01728-5
PMID:40102955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11921651/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite extensive research on physical activity behaviour (PAB), consensus is lacking on related terms and definitions, thereby hindering the ability to compare findings between studies and to develop reliable assessment tools. This study therefore aimed to establish consensus on the definitions of key PAB determinants.

METHODS

First, an international expert steering committee was established, comprising members of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action "DEterminants of Physical ActivitieS in Settings" (DE-PASS). Recently published review-level studies were used to identify key determinants of PAB. Two independent reviewers systematically reviewed the literature to catalogue the range of definitions used for key determinants of PAB (steps 1-2). A two-round modified Delphi survey was conducted online from February to September 2023, to determine the optimal definition for each determinant. In round 1, experts selected the most suitable definition for each of the 41 initially identified determinants. In round 2, experts ranked the appropriateness of the definition selected from round 1 on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥ 75% agreement on the definition (i.e., ratings of ≥ 4 points). A professional English language expert ensured concise, coherent wording and high-quality editing of the definitions (steps 3-6).

RESULTS

Eighty-five experts in PAB research participated in round 1, and sixty-nine experts in round 2. Consensus of definitions was achieved for 39 of the 41 determinants (88.4%-98.6% agreement). The consensus threshold was not achieved for two determinants: genetic profile and regulation (69.6%) and backyard access/size (73.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study offer a consensus-based set of definitions for 39 key determinants of PAB. These definitions can be used homogenously in academic research on physical activity.

摘要

背景

尽管对身体活动行为(PAB)进行了广泛研究,但在相关术语和定义上仍缺乏共识,这阻碍了研究之间比较结果以及开发可靠评估工具的能力。因此,本研究旨在就关键PAB决定因素的定义达成共识。

方法

首先,成立了一个国际专家指导委员会,成员包括欧洲科技合作组织(COST)“环境中身体活动的决定因素”(DE-PASS)行动的成员。利用最近发表的综述级研究来确定PAB的关键决定因素。两名独立评审员系统地回顾文献,以编目用于PAB关键决定因素的定义范围(步骤1-2)。2023年2月至9月进行了两轮在线改良德尔菲调查,以确定每个决定因素的最佳定义。在第一轮中,专家们为最初确定且经筛选的41个决定因素中的每一个选择最合适的定义。在第二轮中,专家们根据5点李克特量表对第一轮中选择的定义的适当性进行排名。事先将共识定义为对定义的≥75%的一致意见(即评分≥4分)。一位专业英语专家确保定义的措辞简洁、连贯,并进行高质量编辑(步骤3-6)。

结果

85名PAB研究专家参与了第一轮,69名专家参与了第二轮。41个决定因素中的39个(88.4%-98.6%的一致意见)达成了定义共识。两个决定因素未达到共识阈值:基因特征和调控(69.6%)以及后院通道/面积(73.9%)。

结论

本研究结果为39个PAB关键决定因素提供了一套基于共识的定义。这些定义可在身体活动的学术研究中统一使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c39d/11921651/40f795c19e79/12966_2025_1728_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c39d/11921651/40f795c19e79/12966_2025_1728_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c39d/11921651/40f795c19e79/12966_2025_1728_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Definitions of determinants of physical activity behaviour: process and outcome of consensus from the DE-PASS expert group.身体活动行为决定因素的定义:DE-PASS专家组的共识达成过程及结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Mar 18;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01728-5.
2
Global Harmonization of Morphological Definitions in Hidradenitis Suppurativa for a Proposed Glossary.全球化脓性汗腺炎形态学定义的协调一致,以提出一个术语表。
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Apr 1;157(4):449-455. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5467.
3
Defining and reporting activity patterns: a modified Delphi study.定义和报告活动模式:一项改良版德尔菲研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jul 25;20(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01482-6.
4
Surgical Procedural Definitions for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Developed by Expert Delphi Consensus.由专家德尔菲共识制定的化脓性汗腺炎手术程序定义。
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Apr 1;159(4):441-447. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6266.
5
Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure.关于子宫腺肌病形态学超声评估(MUSA)特征修订定义的共识:改良 Delphi 程序的结果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):118-131. doi: 10.1002/uog.24786.
6
Definitions for Loss of Domain: An International Delphi Consensus of Expert Surgeons.关于“损失域”的定义:国际专家外科医生德尔菲共识。
World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1070-1078. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05317-z.
7
Terminology of e-Oral Health: Consensus Report of the IADR's e-Oral Health Network Terminology Task Force.电子口腔健康术语:IADR 电子口腔健康网络术语工作组的共识报告。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03929-z.
8
Defining definitions: a Delphi study to develop a core outcome set for conditions of severe maternal morbidity.定义定义:一项德尔菲研究,旨在为严重产妇发病率的条件制定核心结局集。
BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):394-401. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14833. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
9
Globe and Adnexal Trauma Terminology Survey.球和附属器创伤术语调查。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 1;140(8):819-826. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.2594.
10
A Brazilian Association of Women´s Health Physical Therapy (ABRAFISM) guideline on the terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and assessment.巴西女性健康物理治疗协会(ABRAFISM)关于盆底肌肉功能和评估术语的指南。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):101173. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101173. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
DE-PASS best evidence statement (BESt): determinants of adolescents' device-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour in settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.DE-PASS 最佳证据陈述(BESt):环境中青少年基于设备的身体活动和久坐行为的决定因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):1706. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19136-y.
2
Physical Activity and Cognitive Performance in Early Childhood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.幼儿期的身体活动与认知表现:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2024 Jul;54(7):1835-1850. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02020-5. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
3
Could war among nations decrease physical activity levels?
国家间的战争会降低身体活动水平吗?
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2024 Feb;64(2):211-212. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.23.15625-8. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
4
Global trends and future prospects of COVID-19 and physical activity: Bibliometric analysis.全球 COVID-19 与身体活动的趋势和未来展望:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 29;102(39):e35316. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035316.
5
Are Physical Activity Interventions Effective in Improving Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体育活动干预措施是否能有效提高儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Health. 2024 Nov-Dec;16(6):877-885. doi: 10.1177/19417381231190885. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Prospective Association of Daily Steps With Cardiovascular Disease: A Harmonized Meta-Analysis.每日步数与心血管疾病的前瞻性关联:一项综合荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2023 Jan 10;147(2):122-131. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061288. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Recent Secular Trends in Child and Adolescent Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Internationally: Analyses of Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance Global Matrices 1.0 to 4.0.最近国际上儿童和青少年身体活动和久坐行为的长期趋势:积极健康儿童全球联盟全球矩阵 1.0 到 4.0 的分析。
J Phys Act Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(11):729-736. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0312. Print 2022 Nov 1.
8
DE-PASS Best Evidence Statement (BESt): modifiable determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents aged 5-19 years-a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.DE-PASS 最佳证据陈述 (BESt):5-19 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和久坐行为的可改变决定因素-系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e059202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059202.
9
Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness.医疗保健研究中的德尔菲法:如何确定其适用性。
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
10
Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention.青少年的身体活动行为:当前的证据和干预机会。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 31;398(10298):429-442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01259-9. Epub 2021 Jul 21.