Khan Taqi, Ahmad Nadeem, Iqbal Qaisar, Hassan Muneeb, Asnath Lajward, Khan Naveed, Shakeel Sajid
Kidney Transplant Unit, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar 25100, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Department of Surgery, Princess Noura Binti AbdulRehman University, Riyadh 84428, Saudi Arabia.
World J Transplant. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):97598. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.97598.
Transplant teams often hesitate to use the right kidney (RK) in living donor (LD) transplants due to the complexities of anastomosing the short, thin-walled right renal veins, which can potentially lead to graft loss or graft dysfunction. Nevertheless, circumstances may arise where selecting the RK over the left kidney (LK) is unavoidable. Consequently, it is crucial to thoroughly examine the implications of such a choice on the overall transplant outcome.
To compare transplant outcomes between recipients of RK and LK while examining the factors that influence these outcomes.
We retrospectively analyzed data from adult patients who received LD kidney transplants involving meticulous patient selection and surgical techniques at our center from January 2020 to December 2023. We included all kidney donors who were over 18, fit to donate, and had undergone diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid split function and/or computed tomography based volumetry. The variables examined comprised donor and recipient demographics, and outcome measures included technical graft loss (TGL), delayed or slow graft function (SGF), and post-transplant serum creatinine (SC) trends. We used a logistic regression model to assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes considering the donor kidney side.
Of the 250 transplants performed during the period, 56 (22%) were RKs. The recipient demographics and transplant factors were comparable for the right and LKs, except that the donor warm and cold ischemia time were shorter for RKs. TGL and SGF each occurred in 2% ( = 1) of RKs and 0.5% ( = 1) of LKs, the difference being insignificant. These complications, however, were not related to the venous anastomosis. One RK (2%) developed delayed graft function after 48 hours, which was attributable to postoperative hypoxia rather than the surgical technique. The post-transplant SC trend and mean SC at the last follow-up were similar across both kidney sides.
The donor kidney side has little impact on post-transplant adverse events and graft function in LD transplants, provided that careful patient selection and precise surgical techniques are employed.
由于右肾静脉短且壁薄,吻合难度大,移植团队在活体供肾(LD)移植中使用右肾(RK)时往往犹豫不决,这可能导致移植肾丢失或移植肾功能障碍。然而,在某些情况下,选择右肾而非左肾(LK)是不可避免的。因此,全面研究这一选择对整体移植结果的影响至关重要。
比较接受右肾和左肾移植受者的移植结果,并研究影响这些结果的因素。
我们回顾性分析了2020年1月至2023年12月在本中心接受LD肾移植的成年患者的数据,这些患者经过精心的患者选择和手术技术操作。我们纳入了所有年龄超过18岁、适合捐献且接受过二乙三胺五乙酸分肾功能和/或基于计算机断层扫描的体积测量的肾供者。所检查的变量包括供者和受者的人口统计学特征,结果指标包括技术性移植肾丢失(TGL)、移植肾功能延迟或缓慢恢复(SGF)以及移植后血清肌酐(SC)变化趋势。我们使用逻辑回归模型评估考虑供肾侧别时不良结局的可能性。
在此期间进行的250例移植中,56例(22%)为右肾移植。右肾和左肾受者的人口统计学特征及移植因素具有可比性,只是右肾供者的热缺血和冷缺血时间较短。右肾移植的TGL和SGF发生率均为2%(n = 1),左肾移植为0.5%(n = 1),差异无统计学意义。然而,这些并发症与静脉吻合无关。1例右肾移植(2%)在48小时后出现移植肾功能延迟恢复,这归因于术后缺氧而非手术技术。两侧移植肾移植后SC变化趋势及最后一次随访时的平均SC相似。
在LD移植中,只要进行仔细的患者选择和精确的手术技术操作,供肾侧别对移植后不良事件和移植肾功能影响不大。