Ruiz Gianna M, Uram Zach, Strelko Oleksandr, Hossain Adnan, Ng Isaac, Patel Chirag R, Germanwala Anand V
Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States.
College of Podiatric Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024 Apr 30;86(2):173-179. doi: 10.1055/a-2297-9386. eCollection 2025 Apr.
We evaluated the long-term outcomes from a single neurosurgeon and otolaryngologist team using a specific operative protocol for repair and postoperative evaluation. The charts of patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal repair of meningoencephaloceles (MECs) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks were retrospectively reviewed from 2015 to 2023. Intraoperative steps of the repair and reconstruction were analyzed. Patients' postoperative assessments and complications were analyzed. Loyola University Medical Center's electronic medical record database. Forty-three patients (32 female) aged between 11 and 81 years. Long-term outcomes of patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal repair of MECs and CSF leaks by a single team and protocol. We hypothesized that there would be minimal complications and no recurrences, requiring secondary operation. The most common site for MECs was the cribriform plate. Lumbar drain opening pressures ranged from 10 to 35 cm H O with 18 out of 34 patients having the lumbar drain removed immediately postoperatively. The median hospital stay was 3 days. The average length of follow-up was 3.8 years. No recurrences or secondary operations were noted in all patients. One patient had a sinonasal infection that was successfully treated. Eight patients were noted to have venous stenosis and underwent further evaluation. This study represents one of the largest long-term analyses of outcomes by a single team. Our specific protocol for the endoscopic endonasal repair of anterior skull base MECs and CSF leaks is safe and effective. These patients should be evaluated and treated for elevated intracranial pressure following the repair.
我们使用一种特定的手术方案进行修复和术后评估,对来自单一神经外科医生和耳鼻喉科医生团队的长期结果进行了评估。对2015年至2023年期间接受内镜下经鼻修补脑膜脑膨出(MECs)和脑脊液(CSF)漏的患者病历进行了回顾性研究。分析了修复和重建的术中步骤。对患者的术后评估和并发症进行了分析。使用洛约拉大学医学中心的电子病历数据库。43例患者(32例女性),年龄在11岁至81岁之间。研究单一团队和方案进行内镜下经鼻修补MECs和CSF漏患者的长期结果。我们假设并发症极少,且无复发,无需二次手术。MECs最常见的部位是筛板。腰大池引流开口压力范围为10至35cm H₂O,34例患者中有18例在术后立即拔除了腰大池引流管。中位住院时间为3天。平均随访时间为3.8年。所有患者均未出现复发或二次手术。1例患者发生鼻窦感染,经治疗成功。8例患者被发现有静脉狭窄,并接受了进一步评估。本研究是单一团队对结果进行的最大规模长期分析之一。我们用于内镜下经鼻修补前颅底MECs和CSF漏的特定方案是安全有效的。这些患者在修复后应评估并治疗颅内压升高情况。