Sutherland Harry W, Gummerson Christine E, Encandela John, Nascimento Fábio A, Moeller Jeremy J
Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Neurol Educ. 2025 Mar 7;4(1):e200205. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200205. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Neurology residents learn through work-based learning, self-directed learning, and formal didactics. US residency program didactic curricula comply with national standards, but there may be wide design variation. No organization collects data on curricula, so the landscape of educational practices is unclear. This makes it difficult for program directors (PDs) to compare their approach with their peers' and identify methods of interest used elsewhere. We sought to describe existing curricular designs, examine features associated with resident attendance, and evaluate utilization of asynchronous learning.
A survey was designed and validated following established standards. Anonymous online surveys were distributed by email to PDs of US adult neurology programs in April 2023, with responses collected until July 2023. Responding program characteristics were compared with national norms to check representativeness. Descriptive statistics were used to delineate the range of curricular designs. Associations between didactic choices, program characteristics, and attendance were analyzed using nonparametric methods.
Seventy-six (42.0%) of 181 programs responded. Respondents were more likely to be academically based (82% vs 63% nationally, = 0.004) and with larger mean class sizes (7.9 vs 6.1, < 0.001). Daily/noon conference (NC) models were more common than academic half-day (AHD) (63% vs 37%), and lectures predominated. AHD was less common in academic centers (30.0% vs 71.4% elsewhere; = 0.004), the Northeast (14% vs 52.2% elsewhere; = 0.001), and larger classes (6.4 vs 8.8 NC; = 0.022). 75% reported that residents were at least "somewhat" responsible for pagers during conference-with various providers providing coverage. The reported attendance was 63.6 ± 22.0% (range 10%-90%). Attendance was not improved by food ( = 0.415) or AHD ( = 0.230), but it was improved by protected time (78% vs 58% unprotected; < 0.001), fewer didactic hours ( = 0.031), and more PD-led sessions ( = 0.010). 75% of programs encouraged external asynchronous resource usage, and 65% developed internal materials-largely focused on examination preparation and neurophysiology.
The results of this survey describe the landscape of formal didactic curricula. Residency programs use a range of strategies to achieve their educational aims, although some elements are more common to certain program types and some were more successful at increasing resident attendance. Further study is needed to determine best practices from available methodologies.
神经内科住院医师通过基于工作的学习、自主学习和正规教学进行学习。美国住院医师培训项目的教学课程符合国家标准,但设计可能存在很大差异。没有组织收集课程数据,因此教育实践的情况尚不清楚。这使得项目主任难以将自己的方法与同行的方法进行比较,也难以确定其他地方使用的感兴趣的方法。我们试图描述现有的课程设计,研究与住院医师出勤相关的特征,并评估异步学习的利用情况。
按照既定标准设计并验证了一项调查。2023年4月通过电子邮件向美国成人神经内科项目的项目主任分发了匿名在线调查问卷,收集回复直至2023年7月。将回复项目的特征与全国规范进行比较,以检查代表性。使用描述性统计来描述课程设计的范围。使用非参数方法分析教学选择、项目特征和出勤之间的关联。
181个项目中有76个(42.0%)回复。回复者更有可能以学术为基础(82%对全国的63%,P = 0.004),且平均班级规模更大(7.9对6.1,P < 0.001)。每日/中午会议(NC)模式比学术半天(AHD)模式更常见(63%对37%),且讲座占主导。AHD在学术中心不太常见(30.0%对其他地方的71.4%;P = 0.004),在东北部(14%对其他地方的52.2%;P = 0.001)以及大班中也较少见(6.4对NC的8.8;P = 0.022)。75%的项目报告称,住院医师在会议期间至少“在某种程度上”负责传呼机,由各种提供者提供覆盖。报告的出勤率为63.6±22.0%(范围为10% - 90%)。食物(P = 0.415)或AHD(P = 0.230)并未提高出勤率,但受保护时间(78%对无保护的58%;P < 0.001)、较少的教学时长(P = 0.031)以及更多由项目主任主导的课程(P = 0.010)提高了出勤率。75%的项目鼓励使用外部异步资源,65%的项目开发了内部材料,主要集中在考试准备和神经生理学方面。
本次调查结果描述了正规教学课程的情况。住院医师培训项目使用一系列策略来实现其教育目标,尽管某些元素在特定项目类型中更常见,且某些元素在提高住院医师出勤率方面更成功。需要进一步研究以从现有方法中确定最佳实践。