• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生人口统计学因素在L4-5 Ⅰ度腰椎滑脱症治疗中的作用:AO脊柱退变知识论坛的一项调查

Role of Surgeon Demographic Factors in the Management of L4-5 Grade I Spondylolisthesis: A Survey by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative.

作者信息

Muthu Sathish, Simister Samuel K, Shahzad Hania, Le Hai Van, Ambrosio Luca, Corluka Stipe, Vadala Gianluca, Hsieh Patrick C, Virk Michael, Yoon Tim, Cho Samuel K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College & Hospital, Karur, India.

Department of Biotechnology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, India.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 19:21925682251324469. doi: 10.1177/21925682251324469.

DOI:10.1177/21925682251324469
PMID:40105299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11924050/
Abstract

Study DesignCross-sectional survey.ObjectiveWe explore the demographic factors amongst surgeons responsible for decision-making in the management of Grade I L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS).MethodsA survey presenting three clinical scenarios of DLS with varying degrees of neurological compression and instability was distributed to the AOSpine members globally to ascertain surgical management preferences. Management options such as decompression only or decompression and fusion and the techniques that would be employed were presented to the responders.ResultsAfter dissemination, 479 surgeons responded to the survey. Direct decompression was preferred for all three scenarios with and without neurologic deficits(82.5, 81.2, and 56.8%), with the majority favoring open procedures over minimally invasive or endoscopic procedures. Notably, younger, less experienced, and fellowship-trained surgeons showed a higher inclination toward minimally invasive and indirect decompression methods. A strong preference for surgical fusion over decompression(75.2, 92.5 and 86.6%, respectively) was also significantly observed, reflecting a general consensus on the need to achieve segmental stability.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate a pronounced preference for direct decompression and fusion among a group of global surgeons when treating L4-5 Grade I DLS across all demographics. This indicates a consensus on achieving decompression and stability; however, there are some trends indicating the impact of surgical management based on age, experience, and training of the treating providers. These findings suggest an evolution of surgical interventions toward less invasive techniques, particularly among younger surgeons, highlighting the need for global education to adopt innovative approaches in the management of DLS.

摘要

研究设计

横断面调查。

目的

我们探讨负责I度L4-5退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)治疗决策的外科医生的人口统计学因素。

方法

向全球范围内的AO脊柱成员发放一份包含三种不同程度神经受压和不稳定情况的DLS临床病例的调查问卷,以确定手术治疗偏好。向受访者提供了仅减压或减压融合等治疗选择以及将采用的技术。

结果

问卷发放后,479名外科医生回复了调查。对于所有三种有无神经功能缺损的情况,直接减压均为首选(分别为82.5%、81.2%和56.8%),大多数人更倾向于开放手术而非微创或内镜手术。值得注意的是,年轻、经验不足且接受过专科培训的外科医生对微创和间接减压方法的倾向更高。还显著观察到外科医生对手术融合而非减压有强烈偏好(分别为75.2%、92.5%和86.6%),这反映了对实现节段稳定性必要性的普遍共识。

结论

本研究结果表明,在治疗所有人口统计学特征的I度L4-5 DLS时,全球一组外科医生对直接减压和融合有明显偏好。这表明在实现减压和稳定性方面存在共识;然而,有一些趋势表明治疗提供者的年龄、经验和培训对手术治疗有影响。这些发现表明手术干预正朝着侵入性较小的技术发展,尤其是在年轻外科医生中,这突出了开展全球教育以在DLS治疗中采用创新方法的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dbd/11924050/974536c41078/10.1177_21925682251324469-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dbd/11924050/a9aae1616ade/10.1177_21925682251324469-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dbd/11924050/0d5d6884f8a7/10.1177_21925682251324469-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dbd/11924050/974536c41078/10.1177_21925682251324469-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dbd/11924050/a9aae1616ade/10.1177_21925682251324469-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dbd/11924050/0d5d6884f8a7/10.1177_21925682251324469-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dbd/11924050/974536c41078/10.1177_21925682251324469-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Role of Surgeon Demographic Factors in the Management of L4-5 Grade I Spondylolisthesis: A Survey by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative.外科医生人口统计学因素在L4-5 Ⅰ度腰椎滑脱症治疗中的作用:AO脊柱退变知识论坛的一项调查
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 19:21925682251324469. doi: 10.1177/21925682251324469.
2
Open Versus Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An AO Spine Global Cross-Sectional Study.开放手术与微创脊柱手术治疗单节段退变性腰椎滑脱症:一项AO脊柱全球横断面研究
Neurospine. 2025 Mar;22(1):40-47. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448902.451. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
3
Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: factors associated with the decision to fuse.腰椎退行性滑脱:与融合决策相关的因素。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):821-828. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
4
Insights From ISASS Webinar Series on Current and Emerging Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery | Part 3: A Polytomous Rasch Analysis on Surgeons' Endorsement of Multiportal Access, Treatment of Lumbar Facet Cyst, Grade I Spondylolisthesis, and Interbody Fusion.ISASS网络研讨会系列之脊柱内镜手术当前及新兴技术见解 | 第3部分:关于外科医生对多通道入路、腰椎小关节囊肿治疗、I度腰椎滑脱及椎间融合术认可情况的多分类Rasch分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 20;18(S2):S38-S53. doi: 10.14444/8674.
5
Rationale for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.腰椎退行性滑脱症手术治疗的理论依据
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Nov;40(21):E1161-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001116.
6
Current treatment and decision-making factors leading to fusion vs decompression for one-level degenerative spondylolisthesis: survey results from members of the Lumbar Spine Research Society and Society of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.一期退变性腰椎滑脱融合与减压治疗选择及决策因素:腰椎研究学会和微创脊柱外科学会成员的调查结果。
Spine J. 2022 Nov;22(11):1778-1787. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.095. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
7
Differences in the surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis based on self-reported sex: analysis of the CSORN prospective DLS study.基于自我报告性别对退行性腰椎滑脱症手术治疗的差异:CSORN 前瞻性 DLS 研究分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Mar 8;40(6):723-732. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.SPINE23621. Print 2024 Jun 1.
8
[Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis: Clinical Practice Guideline].[退行性腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎滑脱症的外科治疗:临床实践指南]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023;90(3):157-167.
9
Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.不减压侧方腰椎间融合术治疗 L4-5 节段症状性退行性腰椎滑脱的短期疗效。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17566.
10
Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.局部麻醉下单侧入路经皮椎间孔镜 270°减压术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗老年退行性腰椎滑脱伴侧隐窝狭窄症的对比研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 9;18(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03676-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.单纯减压或减压融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症(Nordsten-DS):一项随机、多中心、非劣效性试验的 5 年随访。
BMJ. 2024 Aug 7;386:e079771. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079771.
2
Variations in surgical practice and short-term outcomes for degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spondylolisthesis: do surgeon training and experience matter?退变性腰椎侧凸和脊椎滑脱的手术实践和短期结果的差异:外科医生的培训和经验是否重要?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Feb 2;36(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad109.
3
Physician Practice Pattern Variations in Common Clinical Scenarios Within 5 US Metropolitan Areas.
5 个美国大都市地区常见临床场景下的医生实践模式差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jan 28;3(1):e214698. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4698. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Asia Now Surpasses Europe in Spine Research Productivity: An Analysis From 1976-2020.亚洲在脊柱研究成果方面的产出已超越欧洲:1976-2020 年分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):E477-E484. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004293. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
5
Regional variations in lumbar spine surgery in Finland.芬兰腰椎手术的地区差异。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1451-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04313-0. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
6
Comparison of decompression, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization: a long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized study.减压、减压融合与减压稳定:一项前瞻性随机研究的长期随访。
Spine J. 2022 May;22(5):747-755. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 25.
7
Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.退变性腰椎滑脱症的减压融合与非融合。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):526-538. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990.
8
Surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis: Technique and results.重度腰椎滑脱症的外科治疗:技术与结果
J Orthop. 2020 Aug 25;22:383-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.015. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
9
Classification in Brief: The Meyerding Classification System of Spondylolisthesis.简要分类:腰椎滑脱的迈耶丁分类系统
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 May;478(5):1125-1130. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001153.
10
Is Asia truly a hotspot of contemporary minimally invasive and endoscopic spinal surgery?亚洲真的是当代微创和内镜脊柱手术的热点地区吗?
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jan;6(Suppl 1):S224-S236. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.12.13.