Muthu Sathish, Simister Samuel K, Shahzad Hania, Le Hai Van, Ambrosio Luca, Corluka Stipe, Vadala Gianluca, Hsieh Patrick C, Virk Michael, Yoon Tim, Cho Samuel K
Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College & Hospital, Karur, India.
Department of Biotechnology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, India.
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 19:21925682251324469. doi: 10.1177/21925682251324469.
Study DesignCross-sectional survey.ObjectiveWe explore the demographic factors amongst surgeons responsible for decision-making in the management of Grade I L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS).MethodsA survey presenting three clinical scenarios of DLS with varying degrees of neurological compression and instability was distributed to the AOSpine members globally to ascertain surgical management preferences. Management options such as decompression only or decompression and fusion and the techniques that would be employed were presented to the responders.ResultsAfter dissemination, 479 surgeons responded to the survey. Direct decompression was preferred for all three scenarios with and without neurologic deficits(82.5, 81.2, and 56.8%), with the majority favoring open procedures over minimally invasive or endoscopic procedures. Notably, younger, less experienced, and fellowship-trained surgeons showed a higher inclination toward minimally invasive and indirect decompression methods. A strong preference for surgical fusion over decompression(75.2, 92.5 and 86.6%, respectively) was also significantly observed, reflecting a general consensus on the need to achieve segmental stability.ConclusionThe results of this study demonstrate a pronounced preference for direct decompression and fusion among a group of global surgeons when treating L4-5 Grade I DLS across all demographics. This indicates a consensus on achieving decompression and stability; however, there are some trends indicating the impact of surgical management based on age, experience, and training of the treating providers. These findings suggest an evolution of surgical interventions toward less invasive techniques, particularly among younger surgeons, highlighting the need for global education to adopt innovative approaches in the management of DLS.
研究设计
横断面调查。
目的
我们探讨负责I度L4-5退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)治疗决策的外科医生的人口统计学因素。
方法
向全球范围内的AO脊柱成员发放一份包含三种不同程度神经受压和不稳定情况的DLS临床病例的调查问卷,以确定手术治疗偏好。向受访者提供了仅减压或减压融合等治疗选择以及将采用的技术。
结果
问卷发放后,479名外科医生回复了调查。对于所有三种有无神经功能缺损的情况,直接减压均为首选(分别为82.5%、81.2%和56.8%),大多数人更倾向于开放手术而非微创或内镜手术。值得注意的是,年轻、经验不足且接受过专科培训的外科医生对微创和间接减压方法的倾向更高。还显著观察到外科医生对手术融合而非减压有强烈偏好(分别为75.2%、92.5%和86.6%),这反映了对实现节段稳定性必要性的普遍共识。
结论
本研究结果表明,在治疗所有人口统计学特征的I度L4-5 DLS时,全球一组外科医生对直接减压和融合有明显偏好。这表明在实现减压和稳定性方面存在共识;然而,有一些趋势表明治疗提供者的年龄、经验和培训对手术治疗有影响。这些发现表明手术干预正朝着侵入性较小的技术发展,尤其是在年轻外科医生中,这突出了开展全球教育以在DLS治疗中采用创新方法的必要性。