Departments of1Neurosurgery.
2Orthopedics, and.
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17566.
OBJECTIVE Recently, authors have called into question the utility and complication index of the lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure at the L4-5 level. Furthermore, the need for direct decompression has also been debated. Here, the authors report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion, relying only on indirect decompression to treat patients with neurogenic claudication secondary to Grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis at the L4-5 level. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective evaluation of 18 consecutive patients with Grade 1 or 2 spondylolisthesis from a prospectively maintained database. All patients underwent a transpsoas approach, followed by posterior percutaneous instrumentation without decompression. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-12 were administered during the clinical evaluations. Radiographic evaluation was also performed. The mean follow-up was 6.2 months. RESULTS Fifteen patients with Grade 1 and 3 patients with Grade 2 spondylolisthesis were identified and underwent fusion at a total of 20 levels. The mean operative time was 165 minutes for the combined anterior and posterior phases of the operation. The estimated blood loss was 113 ml. The most common cage width in the anteroposterior dimension was 22 mm (78%). Anterior thigh dysesthesia was identified on detailed sensory evaluation in 6 of 18 patients (33%); all patients experienced resolution within 6 months postoperatively. No patient had lasting sensory loss or motor deficit. The average ODI score improved 26 points by the 6-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up, the SF-12 mean Physical and Mental Component Summary scores improved by 11.9% and 9.6%, respectively. No patient required additional decompression postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This study offers clinical results to establish lateral lumbar interbody fusion as an effective technique for the treatment of Grade 1 or 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. The use of this surgical approach provides a minimally invasive solution that offers excellent arthrodesis rates as well as favorable clinical and radiological outcomes, with low rates of postoperative complications. However, adhering to the techniques of transpsoas lateral surgery, such as minimal table break, an initial look-and-see approach to the psoas, clear identification of the plexus, minimal cranial caudal expansion of the retractor, mobilization of any traversing sensory nerves, and total psoas dilation times less than 20 minutes, ensures the lowest possible complication profile for both visceral and neural injuries even in the narrow safe zones when accessing the L4-5 disc space in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
最近,有作者对 L4-5 水平侧方腰椎体间融合术的实用性和并发症指数提出了质疑。此外,对于直接减压的必要性也存在争议。在此,作者报告了仅依靠间接减压治疗 L4-5 水平神经源性跛行继发于 1 级和 2 级脊椎滑脱症患者的经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的临床和影像学结果。
作者对前瞻性维护的数据库中的 18 例连续 1 级或 2 级脊椎滑脱症患者进行了回顾性评估。所有患者均行经椎间孔入路,后路经皮器械固定而不减压。在临床评估中使用 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和 SF-12。还进行了影像学评估。平均随访 6.2 个月。
共确定 15 例 1 级和 3 例 2 级脊椎滑脱症患者,融合总数为 20 个节段。手术的总手术时间为 165 分钟,包括前路和后路的联合阶段。估计失血量为 113ml。在前后方向最常见的椎间笼宽度为 22mm(78%)。在详细的感觉评估中,18 例患者中有 6 例(33%)发现大腿前侧感觉异常;所有患者均在术后 6 个月内得到解决。无患者出现持续性感觉丧失或运动功能障碍。ODI 评分在 6 个月随访时平均改善了 26 分。在 6 个月随访时,SF-12 平均生理和心理成分综合评分分别提高了 11.9%和 9.6%。术后无患者需要进一步减压。
本研究提供了临床结果,证实了侧方腰椎体间融合术是治疗 L4-5 级 1 级或 2 级退行性脊椎滑脱症的有效技术。这种手术方法提供了微创解决方案,具有极好的融合率以及良好的临床和影像学结果,术后并发症发生率低。然而,遵循经椎间孔侧方手术技术,如最小限度的台面打破、初次透视观察腰大肌、明确识别丛、最小限度的牵开器颅尾扩张、移动任何穿过的感觉神经、以及总腰大肌扩张时间小于 20 分钟,可以确保即使在退行性脊椎滑脱症患者的 L4-5 椎间盘空间进行狭窄安全区域的操作时,内脏和神经损伤的最低并发症发生率。