• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不减压侧方腰椎间融合术治疗 L4-5 节段症状性退行性腰椎滑脱的短期疗效。

Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.

机构信息

Departments of1Neurosurgery.

2Orthopedics, and.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17566.

DOI:10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17566
PMID:29290128
Abstract

OBJECTIVE Recently, authors have called into question the utility and complication index of the lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure at the L4-5 level. Furthermore, the need for direct decompression has also been debated. Here, the authors report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion, relying only on indirect decompression to treat patients with neurogenic claudication secondary to Grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis at the L4-5 level. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective evaluation of 18 consecutive patients with Grade 1 or 2 spondylolisthesis from a prospectively maintained database. All patients underwent a transpsoas approach, followed by posterior percutaneous instrumentation without decompression. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-12 were administered during the clinical evaluations. Radiographic evaluation was also performed. The mean follow-up was 6.2 months. RESULTS Fifteen patients with Grade 1 and 3 patients with Grade 2 spondylolisthesis were identified and underwent fusion at a total of 20 levels. The mean operative time was 165 minutes for the combined anterior and posterior phases of the operation. The estimated blood loss was 113 ml. The most common cage width in the anteroposterior dimension was 22 mm (78%). Anterior thigh dysesthesia was identified on detailed sensory evaluation in 6 of 18 patients (33%); all patients experienced resolution within 6 months postoperatively. No patient had lasting sensory loss or motor deficit. The average ODI score improved 26 points by the 6-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up, the SF-12 mean Physical and Mental Component Summary scores improved by 11.9% and 9.6%, respectively. No patient required additional decompression postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This study offers clinical results to establish lateral lumbar interbody fusion as an effective technique for the treatment of Grade 1 or 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. The use of this surgical approach provides a minimally invasive solution that offers excellent arthrodesis rates as well as favorable clinical and radiological outcomes, with low rates of postoperative complications. However, adhering to the techniques of transpsoas lateral surgery, such as minimal table break, an initial look-and-see approach to the psoas, clear identification of the plexus, minimal cranial caudal expansion of the retractor, mobilization of any traversing sensory nerves, and total psoas dilation times less than 20 minutes, ensures the lowest possible complication profile for both visceral and neural injuries even in the narrow safe zones when accessing the L4-5 disc space in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

摘要

目的

最近,有作者对 L4-5 水平侧方腰椎体间融合术的实用性和并发症指数提出了质疑。此外,对于直接减压的必要性也存在争议。在此,作者报告了仅依靠间接减压治疗 L4-5 水平神经源性跛行继发于 1 级和 2 级脊椎滑脱症患者的经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的临床和影像学结果。

方法

作者对前瞻性维护的数据库中的 18 例连续 1 级或 2 级脊椎滑脱症患者进行了回顾性评估。所有患者均行经椎间孔入路,后路经皮器械固定而不减压。在临床评估中使用 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和 SF-12。还进行了影像学评估。平均随访 6.2 个月。

结果

共确定 15 例 1 级和 3 例 2 级脊椎滑脱症患者,融合总数为 20 个节段。手术的总手术时间为 165 分钟,包括前路和后路的联合阶段。估计失血量为 113ml。在前后方向最常见的椎间笼宽度为 22mm(78%)。在详细的感觉评估中,18 例患者中有 6 例(33%)发现大腿前侧感觉异常;所有患者均在术后 6 个月内得到解决。无患者出现持续性感觉丧失或运动功能障碍。ODI 评分在 6 个月随访时平均改善了 26 分。在 6 个月随访时,SF-12 平均生理和心理成分综合评分分别提高了 11.9%和 9.6%。术后无患者需要进一步减压。

结论

本研究提供了临床结果,证实了侧方腰椎体间融合术是治疗 L4-5 级 1 级或 2 级退行性脊椎滑脱症的有效技术。这种手术方法提供了微创解决方案,具有极好的融合率以及良好的临床和影像学结果,术后并发症发生率低。然而,遵循经椎间孔侧方手术技术,如最小限度的台面打破、初次透视观察腰大肌、明确识别丛、最小限度的牵开器颅尾扩张、移动任何穿过的感觉神经、以及总腰大肌扩张时间小于 20 分钟,可以确保即使在退行性脊椎滑脱症患者的 L4-5 椎间盘空间进行狭窄安全区域的操作时,内脏和神经损伤的最低并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5.不减压侧方腰椎间融合术治疗 L4-5 节段症状性退行性腰椎滑脱的短期疗效。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17566.
2
Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas interbody fusion for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: clinical outcomes.微创侧方经腹膜后经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗 L4-5 腰椎滑脱症:临床结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Sep;19(3):314-20. doi: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE1340. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
3
Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.微创前路和外侧经椎间孔入路闭合复位治疗 II 度脊椎滑脱:初步临床和放射学经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17574.
4
Outcomes following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion for degenerative low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.微创经腰大肌外侧椎间融合术治疗退行性低度腰椎滑脱的疗效:一项系统评价。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;167:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
5
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion after reduction using the percutaneous pedicle screw system in the lateral position for Meyerding grade II spondylolisthesis: a preliminary report of a new lumbar reconstruction strategy.侧卧位经皮椎弓根螺钉系统复位后行侧方腰椎体间融合治疗 Meyerding Ⅱ度滑脱症:一种新的腰椎重建策略的初步报告。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 5;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03935-6.
6
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].腰椎滑脱症腰骶融合术后相邻节段退变:一项回顾性影像学及临床分析
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30.
7
Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion.单纯侧方腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎融合术后症状性邻近节段退变。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):2025-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.微创经腰大肌外侧椎间融合术后腰椎管间接减压的评估:影像学及疗效分析
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011 Oct;54(5-6):201-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1286334. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
9
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.L4/5 Ⅰ度退变性腰椎滑脱症患者斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床与影像学比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(6):1477-1487. doi: 10.1111/os.13360. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
Usefulness of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review.后路腰椎体间融合联合间接减压治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的有效性:一项系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 29;58(4):492. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040492.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study between Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TF-LIF) Using PETLIF System and Minimally Invasive TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorders.使用PETLIF系统的全内镜经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合术(TF-LIF)与微创TLIF治疗退行性腰椎疾病的比较研究
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Dec 20;9(4):460-468. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0254. eCollection 2025 Jul 27.
2
Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.腰椎侧方和斜向椎间融合术的比较性综述:技术、结果及并发症
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 May 12;19(2):246-260. doi: 10.14444/8759.
3
Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.
腰大肌外侧椎间融合术
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 24;19(S1):S7-S18. doi: 10.14444/8711.
4
Comparison of capsule and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in cauda equina syndrome with retention: a 24-month follow-up study.马尾综合征伴持续症状患者行胶囊内镜与后路腰椎间融合术的比较:24 个月随访研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Oct 8;29(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02067-0.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 1-Year Follow-Up.俯卧经腰大肌腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效:1年随访
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 12;18(4):400-407. doi: 10.14444/8625.
6
Comprehensive Assessment of Indirect Decompression Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire-Based Analysis.基于日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷的分析:对腰椎侧方椎间融合术间接减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的综合评估
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):656-667. doi: 10.1177/21925682231204254. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique.俯卧经腰大肌腰椎椎间融合技术的早期临床疗效
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):112-121. doi: 10.14444/8390. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
8
Oblique Lateral Endoscopic Decompression and Interbody Fusion for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technical Note and Preliminary Results.斜外侧入路内镜下减压融合术治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症:技术要点及初步结果。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3400-3407. doi: 10.1111/os.13502. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
9
Usefulness of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review.后路腰椎体间融合联合间接减压治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的有效性:一项系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 29;58(4):492. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040492.
10
Single Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation Utilizing Computer Navigation and Robotic Assistance: Retrospective case review and surgical technique considerations.采用计算机导航和机器人辅助的单节段腰椎侧方椎间融合及后路内固定术:回顾性病例分析及手术技术考量
Global Spine J. 2022 Apr;12(2_suppl):75S-81S. doi: 10.1177/21925682221083909.