Suppr超能文献

在Fontan循环中进行正压通气时改变潮气量的血流动力学效应:一项随机交叉试验。

Hemodynamic Effects of Altering Tidal Volume During Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Fontan Circulation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

作者信息

Navaratnam Manchula, Schmidt Alexander R, Kaplinski Michelle, De Souza Elizabeth, Beattie Meaghan J, Rowe Echo V, Punn Rajesh, Ramamoorthy Chandra

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford Children's Hospital, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, University Children's Hospital Zurich-Eleonore Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Aug;35(8):607-618. doi: 10.1111/pan.15096. Epub 2025 Mar 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary determinants of pulmonary blood flow in the Fontan circulation are low transpulmonary gradient and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Changes in intrathoracic pressure during intermittent positive pressure ventilation can influence the transpulmonary gradient, PVR, pulmonary blood flow, and cardiac output. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low (5 mL/kg) versus high (10 mL/kg) tidal volume (V) ventilation on Fontan circulation hemodynamics.

METHOD

Postoperative patients with a Fontan circulation were enrolled in this single-center, randomized crossover trial. Patients, randomized to group 1 or 2, underwent a ventilation study sequence (baseline ventilation [7 mL/kg], then high V [10 mL/kg] or low V [5 mL/kg], then washout ventilation [7 mL/kg], followed by low [5 mL/kg] or high V [10 mL/kg]) in the operating room at the end of the cardiac surgical procedure. Respiratory, hemodynamic, and transesophageal (TEE) measurements were recorded after 5 min in each ventilation condition. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low V ventilation (5 mL/kg) versus high V ventilation (10 mL/kg) on transpulmonary gradient (Fontan pressure minus left atrial pressure). The secondary aim was to compare TEE measurements of pulmonary blood flow, stroke volume, and Fontan flow between low and high V ventilation. We also compared standard hemodynamic and ventilation parameters for all ventilation conditions. Analysis was of paired data, calculating the between-treatment difference within participants across ventilation conditions.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included in the final data analysis with a median [IQR] age of 5 [4, 11] years and weight of 16.3 [13.8, 31.6] kg. The mean (±SD) peak inspiratory pressure during low and high V ventilation was 15.3 (±2.9) cmHO and 22.2 (±3.7) cmHO, respectively (difference -6.9, 95% CI -7.8, -5.9, p < 0.001). The mean airway pressure during low and high V ventilation was 7.3 ± 0.8 and 8.7 ± 0.9 (difference -1.5, 95% CI -2.1, -0.8, p = 0.001) with a mean inspiratory time of 0.62 (±0.22) s and 1.21 (±0.55) s (difference -0.59, 95% CI -0.84, -0.34, p < 0.001), respectively. During low V ventilation, the mean Fontan pressure was 13.3 (±1.8) mmHg compared to 12.3 (±2.5) mmHg for high V ventilation (difference 0.8, 95% CI -0.5, 2.1, p = 0.18). The mean transpulmonary gradient was 7.0 ± 1.3 mmHg compared to 6.8 ± 1.2 mmHg during low and high V ventilation, respectively (difference 0.2, 95% CI -0.2, 0.6, p = 0.21). We found no significant differences between low and high V ventilation in TEE measures of pulmonary blood flow, stroke volume, and Fontan flow.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized, crossover pilot trial of Fontan patients showed that a low V ventilation (5 mL/kg) resulted in significantly lower peak and mean airway pressure compared with a high V ventilation (10 mL/kg). However, there were no significant changes in transpulmonary gradient, mean Fontan pressure, or TEE parameters of stroke volume, pulmonary blood flow, or Fontan flow.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04633343.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Manchula Navaratnam.

DATE OF REGISTRATION

November 11, 2020. Clinical Trials Registration Registry URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04633343?term=Fontan%20ventilation&rank=3.

PRIOR PRESENTATIONS

Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia Society Annual Meeting Top Oral Abstract Presentation.

PRESENTER

Alexander R Schmidt, March 30th, 2023.

摘要

背景

Fontan循环中肺血流量的主要决定因素是低跨肺压梯度和肺血管阻力(PVR)。间歇正压通气期间胸内压的变化会影响跨肺压梯度、PVR、肺血流量和心输出量。本研究的目的是评估低潮气量(5 mL/kg)与高潮气量(10 mL/kg)通气对Fontan循环血流动力学的影响。

方法

本单中心随机交叉试验纳入了接受Fontan循环手术的术后患者。随机分为1组或2组的患者在心脏外科手术结束时于手术室接受通气研究序列(基线通气[7 mL/kg],然后是高潮气量[10 mL/kg]或低潮气量[5 mL/kg],然后是洗脱通气[7 mL/kg],接着是低潮气量[5 mL/kg]或高潮气量[10 mL/kg])。在每种通气条件下5分钟后记录呼吸、血流动力学和经食管(TEE)测量值。本研究的主要目的是评估低潮气量通气(5 mL/kg)与高潮气量通气(10 mL/kg)对跨肺压梯度(Fontan压减去左心房压)的影响。次要目的是比较低潮气量和高潮气量通气时肺血流量、每搏量和Fontan血流量的TEE测量值。我们还比较了所有通气条件下的标准血流动力学和通气参数。分析采用配对数据,计算参与者在不同通气条件下的治疗组间差异。

结果

11例患者纳入最终数据分析,中位[IQR]年龄为5[4,11]岁,体重为16.3[13.8,31.6]kg。低潮气量和高潮气量通气期间的平均(±SD)吸气峰压分别为15.3(±2.9)cmH₂O和22.2(±3.7)cmH₂O(差值-6.9,95%CI -7.8,-5.9,p<0.001)。低潮气量和高潮气量通气期间的平均气道压分别为7.3±0.8和8.7±0.9(差值-1.5,95%CI -2.1,-0.8,p = 0.001),平均吸气时间分别为0.62(±0.22)秒和1.21(±0.55)秒(差值-0.59,95%CI -0.84,-0.34,p<0.001)。在低潮气量通气时,平均Fontan压为13.3(±1.8)mmHg,而高潮气量通气时为12.3(±2.5)mmHg(差值0.8,95%CI -0.5,2.1,p = 0.18)。低潮气量和高潮气量通气期间的平均跨肺压梯度分别为7.0±1.3 mmHg和6.8±1.2 mmHg(差值0.2,95%CI -0.2,0.6,p = 0.21)。我们发现低潮气量和高潮气量通气在肺血流量、每搏量和Fontan血流量的TEE测量值方面无显著差异。

结论

这项针对Fontan患者的随机交叉试点试验表明,与高潮气量通气(10 mL/kg)相比,低潮气量通气(5 mL/kg)导致吸气峰压和平均气道压显著降低。然而,跨肺压梯度、平均Fontan压或每搏量、肺血流量或Fontan血流量的TEE参数无显著变化。

临床试验注册号

NCT04633343。

主要研究者

曼楚拉·纳瓦拉特南。

注册日期

2020年11月11日。临床试验注册登记网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04633343?term=Fontan%20ventilation&rank=3。

既往报告情况

先天性心脏麻醉学会年会顶级口头摘要报告。

报告人

亚历山大·R·施密特,2023年3月3日。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验