• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下锁骨上干阻滞与胸锁筋膜平面阻滞用于锁骨手术的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Comparison of ultrasound-guided superior trunk block clavipectoral fascial plane block for clavicular surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mohamed Mohamed Gaber, Fahmy Ahmed Mohammad, Medhat Marwa Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2025 Apr 1;38(2):198-206. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24343. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

DOI:10.3344/kjp.24343
PMID:40107773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11965990/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the quality and duration of analgesia between the superior trunk (ST) and the clavipectoral fascial plane (CFP) blocks in conjunction with a selective supraclavicular nerve (SCN) block for clavicular surgeries.

METHODS

Fifty patients undergoing mid-third clavicular procedures were randomly assigned to the ST group (received an SCN block followed by blockage of the ST of the brachial plexus) and the CFP group (received an SCN block followed by the CFP block). The primary outcome was the time until the first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total nalbuphine dosage and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores within the first 24 hours, the onset of sensory block, as well as deltoid and biceps muscle function using the modified Bromage score (MBS), diaphragmatic excursion, along with satisfaction levels.

RESULTS

The ST group exhibited a more prolonged duration until the first request for rescue analgesia compared to the CFP group (18.76 ± 0.89 hours vs. 15.34 ± 1.38 hours), with a mean difference of 3.42 hours (95% confidence interval: 2.76 to 4.08, < 0.001). The ST group consumed less nalbuphine and reported lower NRS scores at 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours than the CFP group. Additionally, the ST group exhibited a lower MBS and diaphragmatic excursion than the CFP group. However, the differences in the onset of sensory block and satisfaction levels were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The ST group demonstrated superior outcomes in pain control with less favorable outcomes concerning diaphragmatic excursion and upper limb motor function.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了在锁骨手术中,联合选择性锁骨上神经(SCN)阻滞时,臂丛上干(ST)阻滞与胸锁筋膜平面(CFP)阻滞的镇痛质量和持续时间。

方法

50例接受锁骨中段手术的患者被随机分为ST组(先接受SCN阻滞,随后阻滞臂丛上干)和CFP组(先接受SCN阻滞,随后进行CFP阻滞)。主要结局指标为首次补救镇痛的时间。次要结局指标包括前24小时内纳布啡的总用量和数字评分量表(NRS)评分、感觉阻滞的起效时间,以及使用改良Bromage评分(MBS)评估的三角肌和肱二头肌功能、膈肌移动度,还有满意度。

结果

与CFP组相比,ST组至首次要求补救镇痛的持续时间更长(18.76±0.89小时 vs. 15.34±1.38小时),平均差异为3.42小时(95%置信区间:2.76至4.08,<0.001)。ST组在6、8、12、16和24小时时消耗的纳布啡更少,NRS评分也低于CFP组。此外,ST组的MBS和膈肌移动度低于CFP组。然而,感觉阻滞起效时间和满意度的差异无统计学意义。

结论

ST组在疼痛控制方面显示出更好的效果,但在膈肌移动度和上肢运动功能方面的效果较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/b2ac0552bb97/kjp-38-2-198-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/2fdc88999ff1/kjp-38-2-198-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/4053e559aa82/kjp-38-2-198-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/b0def6721ce6/kjp-38-2-198-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/b2ac0552bb97/kjp-38-2-198-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/2fdc88999ff1/kjp-38-2-198-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/4053e559aa82/kjp-38-2-198-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/b0def6721ce6/kjp-38-2-198-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/b2ac0552bb97/kjp-38-2-198-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of ultrasound-guided superior trunk block clavipectoral fascial plane block for clavicular surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.超声引导下锁骨上干阻滞与胸锁筋膜平面阻滞用于锁骨手术的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Korean J Pain. 2025 Apr 1;38(2):198-206. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24343. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block combined with clavipectoral fascial plane block or interscalene brachial plexus block in clavicle surgery: a single-centre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.超声引导下颈浅丛阻滞联合锁骨下入路喙锁筋膜间隙阻滞或肌间沟臂丛阻滞在锁骨手术中的应用:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Aug;37(4):985-992. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00968-1. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3
[Comparison of analgesic effect of modified superior trunk block and traditional interscalene brachial plexus block with liposomal bupivacaine after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair].[关节镜下肩袖修复术后改良上干阻滞与传统肌间沟臂丛阻滞联合脂质体布比卡因镇痛效果的比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 13;104(31):2928-2935. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240121-00151.
4
Could C3, 4, and 5 Nerve Root Block be a Better Alternative to Interscalene Block Plus Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Midshaft and Medial Clavicle Fractures? A Randomized Controlled Trial.C3、4、5 神经根阻滞是否可以替代肌间沟阻滞联合颈丛神经阻滞用于治疗锁骨中段和内侧骨折患者?一项随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):798-807. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002479. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
5
Ultrasound-Guided Clavipectoral Fascial Plane Block With Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block for Midshaft Clavicular Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导锁骨下径路肌间沟平面阻滞联合颈丛阻滞用于锁骨中段手术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Sep 1;135(3):633-640. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005911. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Ultrasound-Guided Techniques for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Quadratus Lumborum Block.超声引导技术用于腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者的术后镇痛:竖脊肌平面阻滞与腰方肌阻滞的比较
Pain Physician. 2023 May;26(3):245-256.
7
Superior trunk versus interscalene brachial plexus block in humerus surgery: a randomised controlled trial.肱骨手术中锁骨上与经胸廓前路臂丛神经阻滞的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2024;56(3):194-198. doi: 10.5114/ait.2024.142772.
8
Regional analgesia using ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block versus cervical erector spinae block for anterior cervical spine surgery: a randomized trial.超声引导下颈浅丛阻滞与颈肌间沟阻滞用于前路颈椎手术的区域阻滞效果比较:一项随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02533-6.
9
How Does the Addition of Dexamethasone to a Brachial Plexus Block Change Pain Patterns After Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures? A Randomized, Double-blind Study.地塞米松加入臂丛神经阻滞对桡骨远端骨折手术后疼痛模式的影响:一项随机、双盲研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Oct 1;481(10):1966-1974. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002640. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
10
The Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunct to Local Anesthetics in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.右美托咪定作为局部麻醉药辅助用药在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Analg. 2015 Dec;121(6):1655-60. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001006.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block combined with clavipectoral fascial plane block versus supraclavicular nerve block along with the upper trunk of brachial plexus "The SCUT block" in clavicle surgery: A single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.超声引导下锁骨上神经阻滞联合胸小肌筋膜平面阻滞与锁骨上神经阻滞联合臂丛上干阻滞(“SCUT阻滞”)在锁骨手术中的比较:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Sep;69(9):933-939. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_481_25. Epub 2025 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy Comparison Between Interscalene Block with and Without Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Anesthesia in Clavicle Surgery.锁骨手术中肌间沟阻滞联合与不联合颈浅丛阻滞用于麻醉的效果比较
Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):e142051. doi: 10.5812/aapm-142051. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block Combined With Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for the Removal of Osteosynthesis Material From Clavicle Fracture.胸小肌筋膜平面阻滞联合颈浅丛阻滞用于锁骨骨折内固定物取出术
Cureus. 2023 Aug 8;15(8):e43146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43146. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Ultrasound-Guided Clavipectoral Fascial Plane Block With Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block for Midshaft Clavicular Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
超声引导锁骨下径路肌间沟平面阻滞联合颈丛阻滞用于锁骨中段手术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Sep 1;135(3):633-640. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005911. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
4
Effect of superior trunk block on diaphragm function and respiratory parameters after shoulder surgery.肩部手术后膈神经阻滞对膈肌功能和呼吸参数的影响。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Mar;47(3):167-170. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102962. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Selective blockade of supraclavicular nerves and upper trunk of brachial plexus "The SCUT block" towards a site-specific regional anaesthesia strategy for clavicle surgeries - A descriptive study.锁骨上神经和臂丛神经上干的选择性阻滞——“SCUT阻滞”:一种针对锁骨手术的特定部位区域麻醉策略的描述性研究
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;65(9):656-661. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_255_21. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
6
The Use of Magnesium Sulfate and Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Updated Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.硫酸镁和周围神经阻滞的应用:一项更新的荟萃分析和系统评价。
Clin J Pain. 2021 Aug 1;37(8):629-637. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000944.
7
Perineural and intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine: network meta-analysis of adjunctive effects on supraclavicular brachial plexus block.神经周围及静脉注射地塞米松与右美托咪定:对锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞辅助作用的网状Meta分析
Anaesthesia. 2021 Jul;76(7):974-990. doi: 10.1111/anae.15288. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
8
Use of clavipectoral fascial plane block for clavicle fracture: Two case reports.胸锁筋膜平面阻滞用于锁骨骨折:两例病例报告。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Apr-Jun;14(2):284-285. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_52_20. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
9
Costoclavicular brachial plexus block reduces hemidiaphragmatic paralysis more than supraclavicular brachial plexus block: retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study.锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞比锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞更能减少半膈肌麻痹:一项回顾性、倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Korean J Pain. 2020 Apr 1;33(2):144-152. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.144.
10
Superior Trunk Block Provides Noninferior Analgesia Compared with Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.在上肢关节镜手术中,与肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞相比,肩胛上神经阻滞具有非劣效性的镇痛效果。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Dec;131(6):1316-1326. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002919.