Suppr超能文献

超声引导下锁骨上干阻滞与胸锁筋膜平面阻滞用于锁骨手术的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Comparison of ultrasound-guided superior trunk block clavipectoral fascial plane block for clavicular surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mohamed Mohamed Gaber, Fahmy Ahmed Mohammad, Medhat Marwa Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2025 Apr 1;38(2):198-206. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24343. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the quality and duration of analgesia between the superior trunk (ST) and the clavipectoral fascial plane (CFP) blocks in conjunction with a selective supraclavicular nerve (SCN) block for clavicular surgeries.

METHODS

Fifty patients undergoing mid-third clavicular procedures were randomly assigned to the ST group (received an SCN block followed by blockage of the ST of the brachial plexus) and the CFP group (received an SCN block followed by the CFP block). The primary outcome was the time until the first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total nalbuphine dosage and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores within the first 24 hours, the onset of sensory block, as well as deltoid and biceps muscle function using the modified Bromage score (MBS), diaphragmatic excursion, along with satisfaction levels.

RESULTS

The ST group exhibited a more prolonged duration until the first request for rescue analgesia compared to the CFP group (18.76 ± 0.89 hours vs. 15.34 ± 1.38 hours), with a mean difference of 3.42 hours (95% confidence interval: 2.76 to 4.08, < 0.001). The ST group consumed less nalbuphine and reported lower NRS scores at 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours than the CFP group. Additionally, the ST group exhibited a lower MBS and diaphragmatic excursion than the CFP group. However, the differences in the onset of sensory block and satisfaction levels were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The ST group demonstrated superior outcomes in pain control with less favorable outcomes concerning diaphragmatic excursion and upper limb motor function.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了在锁骨手术中,联合选择性锁骨上神经(SCN)阻滞时,臂丛上干(ST)阻滞与胸锁筋膜平面(CFP)阻滞的镇痛质量和持续时间。

方法

50例接受锁骨中段手术的患者被随机分为ST组(先接受SCN阻滞,随后阻滞臂丛上干)和CFP组(先接受SCN阻滞,随后进行CFP阻滞)。主要结局指标为首次补救镇痛的时间。次要结局指标包括前24小时内纳布啡的总用量和数字评分量表(NRS)评分、感觉阻滞的起效时间,以及使用改良Bromage评分(MBS)评估的三角肌和肱二头肌功能、膈肌移动度,还有满意度。

结果

与CFP组相比,ST组至首次要求补救镇痛的持续时间更长(18.76±0.89小时 vs. 15.34±1.38小时),平均差异为3.42小时(95%置信区间:2.76至4.08,<0.001)。ST组在6、8、12、16和24小时时消耗的纳布啡更少,NRS评分也低于CFP组。此外,ST组的MBS和膈肌移动度低于CFP组。然而,感觉阻滞起效时间和满意度的差异无统计学意义。

结论

ST组在疼痛控制方面显示出更好的效果,但在膈肌移动度和上肢运动功能方面的效果较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6904/11965990/2fdc88999ff1/kjp-38-2-198-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验