Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间中国大学生的心理健康:28个月十波次纵向研究

Mental health among Chinese university students during COVID-19: 28-month, ten-wave longitudinal study.

作者信息

Li Wendy Wen, Miller Daniel, Rouen Christopher, Yang Fang, Yu Huizhen

机构信息

College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Social Work, Foshan University, Foshan, China.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2025 Mar 20;11(2):e56. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.869.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cumulative effects of long-term exposure to pandemic-related stressors and the severity of social restrictions may have been important determinants of mental distress in the time of COVID-19.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate mental health among a cohort of Chinese university students over a 28-month period, focusing on the effects of lockdown type.

METHODS

Depression, anxiety, stress and fear of COVID-19 infection were measured ten times among 188 Chinese students (females 77.7%, mean = 19.8, s.d. = 0.97), every 3 months: from prior to the emergence of COVID-19 in November 2019 (T1) to March 2022 (T10).

RESULTS

Initially depression, anxiety and stress dipped from T1 to T2, followed by a sudden increase at T3 and a slow upward rise over the remainder of the study period (T3 to T10). When locked down at university, participants showed greater mental distress compared with both home lockdown ( = 0.35-0.48) and a no-lockdown comparison period ( = 0.28-0.40). Conversely, home lockdown was associated with less anxiety and stress ( = 0.19 and 0.21, respectively), but not with depression ( = 0.13) compared with a no-lockdown period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the cumulative effects of exposure to COVID-19 stressors over time. It also suggests that the way in which a lockdown is carried out can impact the well-being of those involved. Some forms of lockdown appear to pose a greater threat to mental health than others.

摘要

背景

长期暴露于与疫情相关的压力源以及社会限制的严重程度,可能是新冠疫情期间心理困扰的重要决定因素。

目的

本研究旨在调查一组中国大学生在28个月期间的心理健康状况,重点关注封锁类型的影响。

方法

对188名中国学生(女性占77.7%,平均年龄 = 19.8岁,标准差 = 0.97)每3个月进行一次测量,共测量10次,测量时间从2019年11月新冠疫情出现之前(T1)到2022年3月(T10),测量指标包括抑郁、焦虑、压力以及对新冠病毒感染的恐惧。

结果

最初,抑郁、焦虑和压力从T1到T2有所下降,随后在T3突然上升,并在研究的剩余时间(T3至T10)缓慢上升。与居家封锁(效应量 = 0.35 - 0.48)和非封锁对照期(效应量 = 0.28 - 0.40)相比,在学校被封锁时,参与者表现出更大的心理困扰。相反,与非封锁期相比,居家封锁与较少的焦虑和压力相关(效应量分别为0.19和0.21),但与抑郁无关(效应量为0.13)。

结论

本研究强调了随着时间推移接触新冠疫情压力源的累积效应。研究还表明,封锁的实施方式会影响相关人员的幸福感。某些形式的封锁似乎比其他形式对心理健康构成更大威胁。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeba/12001943/61389c651b2f/S205647242400869X_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验