• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Empathy Scores and Curriculum Integration at Two Different Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study of Final-Year Medical and Dental Students.两个不同层次的共情分数与课程整合:一项针对医学和牙科专业最后一年学生的横断面研究。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):e79104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79104. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Evaluation and Revision of the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale.《Kiersma-Chen 同理心量表的评估与修订》。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Jun;86(5):8685. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8685. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
3
Measuring the impact of a 3D simulation experience on nursing students' cultural empathy using a modified version of the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale.使用Kiersma-Chen同理心量表的修订版来衡量3D模拟体验对护生文化同理心的影响。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Oct;24(19-20):2849-58. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12893. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
4
Evaluating the impact of a decision-making game on empathy development in pharmacy students from the dual perspectives of the patient and pharmacist.从患者和药剂师的双重角度评估决策游戏对药学学生同理心发展的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2024 Dec;16(12):102187. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102187. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
5
Comparing empathy in medical students of two Portuguese medicine schools.比较两所葡萄牙医学院医学生的同理心。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 13;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02034-3.
6
Unfolding the empathic insights and tendencies among medical students of two gulf institutions using interpersonal reactivity index.运用人际反应指标,展现两所海湾地区医疗机构医学生的同理心洞察和倾向。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05921-1.
7
Declining empathy trends throughout medical curriculum and association factors of low empathy among medical students and residents: a single center study.医学课程中同理心呈下降趋势,以及医学生和住院医师同理心水平低的相关因素:一项单中心研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 31;24(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05962-6.
8
Maintaining empathy in medical school: it is possible.在医学院保持同理心:这是可能的。
Med Teach. 2013 Dec;35(12):1002-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.802296. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
9
Measuring empathy of medical students studying different curricula; a causal comparative study.测量不同课程的医学生的同理心:一项因果比较研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Aug;67(8):1238-1241.
10
Establishing Validity Evidence for Parallel Patient-Provider Empathy Scales to Drive Self-reflection.为促进自我反思建立平行的患者-提供者共情量表的效度证据。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Nov;86(8):ajpe8801. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8801. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Factor structure of the Jefferson Scale for Empathy among medical undergraduates from South India.印度南部医学本科生杰斐逊共情量表的因子结构
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;65(7):755-759. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_385_23. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
2
Empathy in patient care: from 'Clinical Empathy' to 'Empathic Concern'.患者关怀中的同理心:从“临床同理心”到“共情关怀”。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):573-585. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10033-4. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Measures of empathy and the capacity for self-reflection in dental and medical students.牙科学生和医学生同理心和自我反省能力的测量。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02549-3.
4
Medical Students' Empathy Level Differences by Medical Year, Gender, and Specialty Interest in Akdeniz University.阿克德尼兹大学医学生按学年、性别和专业兴趣划分的共情水平差异
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Jul 31;7:2382120520940658. doi: 10.1177/2382120520940658. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Empathy levels among undergraduate medical students in Pakistan, a cross sectional study using Jefferson scale of physician empathy.巴基斯坦本科医学生的共情水平:一项使用杰斐逊医生共情量表的横断面研究
J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Jul;70(7):1149-1153. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.301593.
6
Revisiting the trajectory of medical students' empathy, and impact of gender, specialty preferences and nationality: a systematic review.重新审视医学生同理心的轨迹,以及性别、专业偏好和国籍的影响:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1964-5.
7
Improving Empathy in Nursing Students: A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Two Curricula.提高护理专业学生的同理心:两种课程的比较纵向研究
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Oct;48(5):497-505. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.5.497.
8
Examining the relationship between burnout and empathy in healthcare professionals: A systematic review.探究医疗保健专业人员职业倦怠与同理心之间的关系:一项系统综述。
Burn Res. 2017 Sep;6:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.burn.2017.06.003.
9
A Quantitative Study of Empathy in Pakistani Medical Students: A Multicentered Approach.巴基斯坦医学生同理心的定量研究:一种多中心方法。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):294-299. doi: 10.1177/2150131917716233. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
Consequences of the presence and absence of empathy during consultations in primary care: A focus group study with patients.基层医疗咨询中同理心存在与缺失的后果:一项针对患者的焦点小组研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):987-993. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

两个不同层次的共情分数与课程整合:一项针对医学和牙科专业最后一年学生的横断面研究。

Empathy Scores and Curriculum Integration at Two Different Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study of Final-Year Medical and Dental Students.

作者信息

Faisal Amna, Akhlaq Saira, Bhatti Naveed

机构信息

Community and Preventive Dentistry, Dental College, Heavy Industries Taxila Education City-Institute of Medical Sciences (HITEC-IMS), Taxila, PAK.

School of Health Professions Education, Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-E-Millat University (STMU), Islamabad, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):e79104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79104. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.79104
PMID:40109841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11920857/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Empathy is a defining trait for healthcare professionals as it fosters trust and understanding between providers and patients. In medical and dental education, empathy is required for enhancing protective health outcomes. Empathy levels vary among medical students throughout their medical schooling and are impacted by factors such as curriculum structure, clinical exposure, and personal characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare empathy scores corresponding to different levels of curricular integration as defined by Harden, in order to identify any potential differences in empathy levels between two groups.

METHODOLOGY

Two study samples, one consisting of medical students and the other of dental students, completed the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale-Revised (KCES-R). Empathy scores were assessed across two levels of curriculum integration based on Harden's integration ladder.

RESULTS

The results indicated that students instructed at a higher level of curricular integration reported higher empathy scores compared to those instructed at a lower integration level.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest a positive relationship between curricular integration and empathy scores in medical and dental students.

摘要

背景

同理心是医疗保健专业人员的一项决定性特质,因为它能促进医护人员与患者之间的信任和理解。在医学和牙科教育中,同理心对于改善健康保护结果至关重要。医学生在整个医学学习过程中的同理心水平各不相同,并受到课程结构、临床接触和个人特质等因素的影响。

目的

本研究旨在比较与哈登所定义的不同课程整合水平相对应的同理心得分,以确定两组之间同理心水平的任何潜在差异。

方法

两个研究样本,一个由医学生组成,另一个由牙科学生组成,完成了基尔斯马-陈同理心量表修订版(KCES-R)。根据哈登的整合阶梯,在两个课程整合水平上评估同理心得分。

结果

结果表明,接受更高课程整合水平指导的学生相比接受较低整合水平指导的学生,报告的同理心得分更高。

结论

总之,本研究结果表明医学和牙科学生的课程整合与同理心得分之间存在正相关关系。