Suppr超能文献

两个不同层次的共情分数与课程整合:一项针对医学和牙科专业最后一年学生的横断面研究。

Empathy Scores and Curriculum Integration at Two Different Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study of Final-Year Medical and Dental Students.

作者信息

Faisal Amna, Akhlaq Saira, Bhatti Naveed

机构信息

Community and Preventive Dentistry, Dental College, Heavy Industries Taxila Education City-Institute of Medical Sciences (HITEC-IMS), Taxila, PAK.

School of Health Professions Education, Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-E-Millat University (STMU), Islamabad, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):e79104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79104. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Empathy is a defining trait for healthcare professionals as it fosters trust and understanding between providers and patients. In medical and dental education, empathy is required for enhancing protective health outcomes. Empathy levels vary among medical students throughout their medical schooling and are impacted by factors such as curriculum structure, clinical exposure, and personal characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare empathy scores corresponding to different levels of curricular integration as defined by Harden, in order to identify any potential differences in empathy levels between two groups.

METHODOLOGY

Two study samples, one consisting of medical students and the other of dental students, completed the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale-Revised (KCES-R). Empathy scores were assessed across two levels of curriculum integration based on Harden's integration ladder.

RESULTS

The results indicated that students instructed at a higher level of curricular integration reported higher empathy scores compared to those instructed at a lower integration level.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest a positive relationship between curricular integration and empathy scores in medical and dental students.

摘要

背景

同理心是医疗保健专业人员的一项决定性特质,因为它能促进医护人员与患者之间的信任和理解。在医学和牙科教育中,同理心对于改善健康保护结果至关重要。医学生在整个医学学习过程中的同理心水平各不相同,并受到课程结构、临床接触和个人特质等因素的影响。

目的

本研究旨在比较与哈登所定义的不同课程整合水平相对应的同理心得分,以确定两组之间同理心水平的任何潜在差异。

方法

两个研究样本,一个由医学生组成,另一个由牙科学生组成,完成了基尔斯马-陈同理心量表修订版(KCES-R)。根据哈登的整合阶梯,在两个课程整合水平上评估同理心得分。

结果

结果表明,接受更高课程整合水平指导的学生相比接受较低整合水平指导的学生,报告的同理心得分更高。

结论

总之,本研究结果表明医学和牙科学生的课程整合与同理心得分之间存在正相关关系。

相似文献

2
Evaluation and Revision of the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale.《Kiersma-Chen 同理心量表的评估与修订》。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Jun;86(5):8685. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8685. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
8
Maintaining empathy in medical school: it is possible.在医学院保持同理心:这是可能的。
Med Teach. 2013 Dec;35(12):1002-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.802296. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Factor structure of the Jefferson Scale for Empathy among medical undergraduates from South India.印度南部医学本科生杰斐逊共情量表的因子结构
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;65(7):755-759. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_385_23. Epub 2023 Jul 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验