Park Sungchul, Chen Jie, Bustamante Arturo Vargas, Ortega Alexander N
Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug;60(4):e14610. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14610. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
To examine differences in the utilization of low-value care among Asian and Latino subpopulations compared to the White population.
We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional national survey.
Our sample included a non-Latino White population and Asian and Latino subpopulation groups using data from the 2013-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Asian and Latino subpopulations used health care services less frequently than the White population, with adjusted differences ranging from -3.2% points (95% CI: -3.9, -2.4) to -9.4 (-10.1, -8.7) for outpatient visits, -5.2 (-5.9, -4.5) to -12.4 (-15.2, -9.6) for office-based provider visits, and -5.2 (-6.7, -3.8) to -19.1 (-21.6, -16.7) for prescription drug fills. Although certain low-value services were reported less among Asian and Latino subpopulations, there were no differences in almost six out of twelve services when compared to the White population. These patterns were notable among Asian subpopulations (Indians, Chinese, Filipinos, and other Asians). Additionally, Asian and Latino subpopulation groups had distinct patterns in the use of low-value care. Compared to the White population, Asian subpopulation groups had lower utilization of low-value medications including benzodiazepines for depression (-11.5 [-15.1, -8.0] to -13.8 [-24.4, -3.3]) and opioids for back pain (-4.4 [-8.5, -0.3] to -10.1 [-13.6, -6.7]). Latino subpopulation groups had higher utilization of low-value cervical cancer screening (5.7 [3.0-8.4] to 24.5 [16.9-32.1]) and lower utilization of magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography for back pain (-1.6 [-2.4, -0.8] to -4.9 [-7.1, -2.6]) than the White population.
Despite lower overall health care utilization, Asian and Latino subpopulations do not necessarily use the low-value care examined in this study less than the White population. This suggests that lower overall health care utilization among Asian and Latino subpopulations may not solely be attributed to lower use of low-value care.
研究与白人相比,亚洲和拉丁裔亚人群在低价值医疗利用方面的差异。
我们分析了一项重复横断面全国性调查的数据。
我们的样本包括非拉丁裔白人、亚洲和拉丁裔亚人群体,使用的是2013 - 2021年医疗支出面板调查的数据。
亚洲和拉丁裔亚人群体使用医疗服务的频率低于白人,门诊就诊的调整差异在-3.2个百分点(95%置信区间:-3.9,-2.4)至-9.4(-10.1,-8.7)之间,基于办公室的医疗服务提供者就诊的差异在-5.2(-5.9,-4.5)至-12.4(-15.2,-9.6)之间,处方药配药的差异在-5.2(-6.7,-3.8)至-19.1(-21.6,-16.7)之间。虽然亚洲和拉丁裔亚人群体报告的某些低价值服务较少,但与白人相比,十二种服务中有近六种没有差异。这些模式在亚洲亚人群体(印度人、中国人、菲律宾人和其他亚洲人)中尤为明显。此外,亚洲和拉丁裔亚人群体在低价值医疗的使用上有不同模式。与白人相比,亚洲亚人群体对包括用于治疗抑郁症的苯二氮䓬类药物(-11.5 [-15.1,-8.0]至-13.8 [-24.4,-3.3])和用于治疗背痛的阿片类药物(-4.4 [-8.5,-0.3]至-10.1 [-13.6,-6.7])在内的低价值药物的使用率较低。拉丁裔亚人群体对低价值宫颈癌筛查的使用率较高(5.7 [3.0 - 8.4]至24.5 [16.9 - 32.1]),而对用于背痛的磁共振成像/计算机断层扫描的使用率低于白人(-1.6 [-2.4,-0.8]至-4.9 [-7.1,-2.6])。
尽管亚洲和拉丁裔亚人群体的总体医疗利用率较低,但他们在本研究中所考察的低价值医疗使用方面不一定比白人少。这表明亚洲和拉丁裔亚人群体总体医疗利用率较低可能不仅仅归因于低价值医疗使用较少。