Archibeck Erin, Strigo Irina, Scheffler Aaron, Torres-Espin Abel, Khattab Karim, Silvestros Pavlos, Matthew Robert, Regan Caitlin, Hodges Paul, O'Neill Conor, Lotz Jeffrey, O'Connell Grace, Bailey Jeannie
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08730-2.
The relationship between pain experience and biomechanical impairment in chronic low back pain (LBP) is unclear. Among the broader pain literature, sex-based differences in pain experience have been established. However, it is unknown if sex-based differences in pain experience relates to compromised movement patterns for patients with chronic LBP. This study examined sex differences and whether there are sex-based associations between pain experience and biomechanical function in patients with chronic LBP.
To capture the biomechanical variability among LBP patients, we quantified full-body movement quality based on the extent that 3D postural trajectories deviated from matched controls during a sit-to-stand task (Kinematic Composite Score, K-Score). For both males and females, the K-Score was compared to pain measures, including patient-reported metrics and quantitative sensory testing (pressure pain threshold, PPT).
There were significant sex-based differences in pain experience and biomechanical function in patients with LBP. Specifically, males exhibited ~ 8% lower trunk K-Scores, indicating biomechanical function that deviated more from controls when compared to female participants (p < 0.001). However, females exhibited PPT values 29% and 41% lower than males at the control and pain sites, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was a weak but significant negative association between PPT and K-Scores for males (R = 0.14, p < 0.01), while females lacked an association.
Overall, males with LBP exhibited worse movement quality, driven by trunk motion, but higher PPTs. Possible explanations include reduced interoceptive awareness or increased kinesiophobia in males, which may influence movement patterns. This research is an initial step in uncovering the complex relationship between patient-specific factors influencing LBP disability, laying the groundwork for further exploration, and paving the way for improving outcomes with patient-specific treatments.
慢性下腰痛(LBP)患者的疼痛体验与生物力学损伤之间的关系尚不清楚。在更广泛的疼痛文献中,已经确定了疼痛体验中基于性别的差异。然而,尚不清楚慢性LBP患者疼痛体验中的性别差异是否与运动模式受损有关。本研究调查了慢性LBP患者的性别差异,以及疼痛体验与生物力学功能之间是否存在基于性别的关联。
为了捕捉LBP患者的生物力学变异性,我们根据坐立任务期间3D姿势轨迹偏离匹配对照组的程度来量化全身运动质量(运动学综合评分,K评分)。对于男性和女性,将K评分与疼痛指标进行比较,包括患者报告的指标和定量感觉测试(压力疼痛阈值,PPT)。
LBP患者在疼痛体验和生物力学功能方面存在显著的性别差异。具体而言,男性的躯干K评分低约8%,这表明与女性参与者相比,其生物力学功能偏离对照组的程度更大(p<0.001)。然而,女性在对照部位和疼痛部位的PPT值分别比男性低29%和41%(p<0.0001)。男性的PPT与K评分之间存在微弱但显著的负相关(R=0.14,p<0.01),而女性则不存在这种关联。
总体而言,患有LBP的男性表现出较差的运动质量,这是由躯干运动驱动的,但PPT较高。可能的解释包括男性的内感受意识降低或运动恐惧增加,这可能会影响运动模式。这项研究是揭示影响LBP残疾的患者特异性因素之间复杂关系的第一步,为进一步探索奠定了基础,并为通过患者特异性治疗改善治疗效果铺平了道路。