Hewson G S, Ralph M, Cattani M
Edith Cowan University, School of Medical and Health Sciences, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia.
J Radiol Prot. 2025 Mar 28;45(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/adc312.
This study aimed to revisit previousthorium studies on workers and reevaluate their significance against the current International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) models for thorium intake. Thorium concentrations in the urine and blood serum of Western Australian mineral sands workers had previously been interpreted using biokinetic models recommended by the ICRP. These findings revealed significant inconsistencies with those of other monitoring methods, includinglung counting and personal air sampling. Data on thorium concentrations in the urine and blood serum of workers and their exposure records were extracted from the previously published research and assessed using the Taurus internal dosimetry software application. Inhalation intake parameters such as aerosol particle size and lung solubility were selected to reflect the chronic intake of relatively insoluble mineral sands dust. The literature values for the urinary excretion of thorium by other thorium-exposed workers were also reviewed. Internal dosimetry modelling highlights the sensitivity of urinary thorium excretion as a function of the dust particle size distribution and particle dissolution rate. The timing of urine sample collection is particularly critical during the early years of chronic intake, especially in certain work rosters. The significantly lower urinary thorium concentrations predicted for chronic intake of Type S thorium compounds highlight the need for sensitive analytical techniques for bioassays and a better understanding of non-occupational (environmental) intake. Current ICRP biokinetic models applied to urinary thorium concentrations reported for mineral sands workers and other thorium-exposed workers infer that past doses are likely to be underestimated and are now significant.
本研究旨在重新审视先前关于钍作业工人的研究,并根据当前国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)的钍摄入模型重新评估其意义。西澳大利亚矿砂工人尿液和血清中的钍浓度此前一直使用ICRP推荐的生物动力学模型进行解释。这些结果显示与其他监测方法(包括肺部计数和个人空气采样)的结果存在显著差异。从先前发表的研究中提取了工人尿液和血清中钍浓度的数据及其暴露记录,并使用金牛座内部剂量测定软件应用程序进行评估。选择吸入摄入参数,如气溶胶粒径和肺部溶解度,以反映相对不溶性矿砂粉尘的长期摄入情况。还回顾了其他钍暴露工人钍尿排泄的文献值。内部剂量测定模型突出了钍尿排泄作为粉尘粒径分布和颗粒溶解速率函数的敏感性。在长期摄入的早期,尤其是在某些工作排班中,尿液样本采集的时间尤为关键。对于S型钍化合物长期摄入预测的钍尿浓度显著较低,这突出了生物测定中灵敏分析技术的必要性以及对非职业(环境)摄入的更好理解。应用于矿砂工人和其他钍暴露工人报告的钍尿浓度的当前ICRP生物动力学模型推断,过去的剂量可能被低估,且现在具有重要意义。