Germann Maria, Nabila Eldesta, Baker Stuart N
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
eNeuro. 2025 Mar 20;12(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0103-24.2024. Print 2025 Mar.
Cutaneomuscular reflexes (CMRs) can be recorded in the hand muscle of human subjects after stimulation of a digital nerve. We hypothesized that repeated synchronous stimulation of nerves from two digits may lead to long-term plastic changes in CMR, by the mechanisms of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). To test this idea, we conducted experiments in 27 healthy human volunteers. After baseline measurement of CMR, one of four 30-min-long stimulation conditions were tested; the CMR was then remeasured. The four conditions were simultaneous index finger and thumb stimulation; asynchronous index finger and thumb stimulation; thumb 5 ms before index finger stimulation; and thumb-only stimulation. Neither the early (E1) nor late excitatory (E2) components of the CMR showed consistent changes after any stimulation condition. The inhibitory (I1) component was slightly reduced in all cases. To understand why paired stimulation did not produce long-term changes, we conducted a further experiment. In this, we measured the CMR in response to simultaneous stimulation of index finger and thumb, compared with a prediction expected if the responses summed linearly. This revealed sublinear summation, possibly indicating partial response saturation after stimulation of only one digit. We argue such a pattern prevents paired stimuli from generating especially reliable and well-timed outputs relative to synaptic inputs in downstream neurons, which is required to produce plasticity by STDP.
在对人手指神经进行刺激后,可以记录到人体手部肌肉的皮肤肌肉反射(CMR)。我们假设,通过依赖于峰电位时间的可塑性(STDP)机制,对来自两个手指的神经进行重复同步刺激可能会导致CMR的长期可塑性变化。为了验证这一想法,我们对27名健康志愿者进行了实验。在对CMR进行基线测量后,测试了四种30分钟长的刺激条件之一;然后重新测量CMR。这四种条件分别是食指和拇指同时刺激;食指和拇指异步刺激;拇指在食指刺激前5毫秒刺激;以及仅刺激拇指。在任何刺激条件后,CMR的早期(E1)和晚期兴奋性(E2)成分均未表现出一致的变化。在所有情况下,抑制性(I1)成分均略有降低。为了理解为什么配对刺激没有产生长期变化,我们进行了进一步的实验。在该实验中,我们测量了对食指和拇指同时刺激的CMR,并将其与如果反应呈线性相加时预期的预测值进行比较。这揭示了亚线性相加,可能表明仅刺激一个手指后出现了部分反应饱和。我们认为,这种模式会阻止配对刺激相对于下游神经元中的突触输入产生特别可靠且时机合适的输出,而这是通过STDP产生可塑性所必需的。