Deng Wen-Ping, Zhu Wen-Bo, Zhang Zhe, Li Hai-Feng, Hu Jia-Ning, Fu Jing-Ya
College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Research Center of Regional Development and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Mar 8;46(3):1517-1534. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202403231.
As an important province in China with a large population, agriculture, industry, and energy consumption, Henan Province is in a period of attack and opportunity for low-carbon transformation of its economy and optimization of its energy structure, and carrying out a study on the assessment of carbon budget and carbon compensation at the county level, to promote the coordinated development of a low-carbon economy in central China and to realize China's vision of carbon neutrality by 2060, is important. The study selected 123 county-level units in Henan Province as the research object, based on the land use data of Henan Province from 2000 to 2020, constructed the carbon balance estimation model and measured the horizontal compensation standard with the help of the modified carbon compensation model, studied the spatio-temporal pattern of carbon balance and carbon compensation zoning of Henan Province under the perspective of the main functional area, and put forward the regional development strategy guided by the development of low-carbon economy. The research results demonstrated that: ① From 2000 to 2020, the total amount of carbon emissions from land use in Henan Province first increased and then decreased, with the peak in 2015, and the construction land was the major source of carbon. The amount of carbon absorption continued to grow steadily, and arable land and forest land were the major carriers of carbon sinks. The carbon budget showed significant spatial and temporal characteristics; carbon absorption showed a spatial pattern of "high in the west and low in the east, high in the south and low in the north;" and carbon emissions were spatially characterized by "a concentration of high values in the center and the north and a scattering of low values towards the outside." ② Henan Province exhibited similar spatial patterns in carbon intensity and net emissions, with high values in the central and northern regions tapering off outwards. From 2000 to 2020, carbon emission intensity ranked as follows: national key development zones (1.09) > provincial key areas (0.93) > agricultural areas (0.83) > provincial ecological zones (0.70) > national ecological zones (0.47). For net carbon emissions, the order was (×10 t): national key zones (165.94) > provincial key areas (52.55) > agricultural areas (-35.52) > provincial ecological zones (-47.11) > national ecological zones (-60.93). Conversely, carbon compensation rates(%) were highest in provincial ecological zones (821), followed by those in national ecological zones (773), agricultural areas (412), provincial key areas (198), and lowest in national key zones (11). ③ Carbon compensation varied significantly across 123 counties in Henan Province, with a total carbon payment of 9 207.09×10 yuan and offset of 4 819.29×10 yuan in 2020. A total of 45 payment zones and 78 compensation zones were identified, including 20 heavy payment zones and 30 heavy compensation zones. ④ Henan Province was divided into seven carbon intensity control areas, 33 total carbon control areas, 12 carbon balance areas, 12 low-carbon optimization areas, and 59 green carbon sink areas based on main functional areas. A regional optimization strategy was proposed to foster low-carbon economy development in Henan Province. The study offers insights for 123 counties in Henan Province to establish localized carbon compensation mechanisms, supporting the coordinated low-carbon economic development in central China and the pursuit of carbon neutrality.
河南省作为中国人口大省、农业大省、工业大省和能源消耗大省,正处于经济低碳转型和能源结构优化的攻坚期与机遇期。开展县级碳预算与碳补偿评估研究,对于推动中部地区低碳经济协调发展、实现中国2060年碳中和愿景具有重要意义。该研究选取河南省123个县级单元为研究对象,基于2000—2020年河南省土地利用数据,构建碳平衡估算模型,并借助改进的碳补偿模型测算水平补偿标准,从主体功能区视角研究河南省碳平衡时空格局与碳补偿分区,提出以低碳经济发展为导向的区域发展战略。研究结果表明:①2000—2020年,河南省土地利用碳排放总量先增后降,2015年达到峰值,建设用地是主要碳排放源;碳吸收量持续稳步增长,耕地和林地是主要碳汇载体。碳预算呈现显著的时空特征;碳吸收呈现“西高东低、南高北低”的空间格局;碳排放呈现“中部和北部高值集中、向外低值分散”的空间特征。②河南省碳强度和净排放量呈现相似的空间格局,中部和北部地区值高,向外逐渐递减。2000—2020年,碳排放强度排序为:国家重点开发区(1.09)>省级重点区域(0.93)>农业区(0.83)>省级生态区(0.70)>国家生态区(0.47)。净碳排放量排序为(×10 t):国家重点开发区(165.94)>省级重点区域(52.55)>农业区(-35.52)>省级生态区(-47.11)>国家生态区(-60.93)。相反,碳补偿率(%)在省级生态区最高(821),其次是国家生态区(773)、农业区(412)、省级重点区域(198),在国家重点开发区最低(11)。③河南省123个县的碳补偿差异显著,2020年碳支付总额为9 207.09×10元,抵消量为4 819.29×10元。共识别出45个支付区和78个补偿区,包括20个重支付区和30个重补偿区。④基于主体功能区,河南省被划分为7个碳强度控制区、33个碳排放总量控制区、12个碳平衡区、12个低碳优化区和59个绿色碳汇区。提出了促进河南省低碳经济发展的区域优化战略。该研究为河南省123个县建立本地化碳补偿机制提供了思路,支持中部地区低碳经济协调发展和碳中和目标的实现。