Pang Jiao, Huang Xue-Han, Shan Jing, Miao Zi-Han, Yan Feng, Ding Yan-Rui, Shen Lin, Chen Yong-Xia, Yang Chun-Chun
Bohai College, Hebei Agricultural University, Cangzhou 061100, China.
School of Land and Resources, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Apr 8;46(4):1974-1984. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202403287.
As an important "capital city economic circle," the determination of county carbon balance zones in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei counties is of great significance to its regional low-carbon development and achievement of the "dual-carbon" strategy. This study explores the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of carbon emissions and sequestration in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei counties from 2002 to 2020 based on the China carbon accounting database (CAD) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) data. It further introduces the economy contributive coefficient (ECC) and ecological support coefficient (ESC) to analyze the energy efficiency and carbon sequestration capacity of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei counties, followed by the integration of the main functional areas (MFAs) of the territorial spatial planning. In this study, the carbon balance zoning of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei counties was optimized. The results showed that: ① In 2002, 2011, and 2020, the carbon emissions in the counties of Beijing and Tianjin showed a spatial distribution of "high in the southeast and low in the northwest," and the areas with high carbon sequestration were concentrated in the northwestern part of the counties of Zhangjiakou and Chengde. ② The ECC and ESC exhibited distinctive spatial heterogeneity in their spatial distribution, with ECC showing a decrease from Beijing to the surrounding area and the coefficient increasing with passing years. ESC showed a high spatial distribution in the north and low in the south, which showed improvement with passing years with the implementation of the sustainable development strategy. ③ The county carbon balance zoning after integrating the main function zoning was further refined into 16 sub-zones, where the low-carbon maintenance zone-key ecological function zone was mainly concentrated in the northwest, with a wider distribution but decreasing trend in quantity. Further, the distribution of the economic development zone-agricultural products and the carbon sink development zone-agricultural products main production zone was relatively stable, and the comprehensive optimization zone-agricultural products main production zone was mainly located in the southeastern part of the region, with a the number being the largest. These findings provides accurate data supporting the control of carbon emissions and economic development zoning in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei counties.
作为重要的“首都经济圈”,京津冀县域碳平衡分区的确定对其区域低碳发展和实现“双碳”战略具有重要意义。本研究基于中国碳核算数据库(CAD)和净生态系统生产力(NEP)数据,探究了2002年至2020年京津冀县域碳排放与碳固存的时空分布格局。进一步引入经济贡献系数(ECC)和生态支撑系数(ESC),分析京津冀县域的能源效率和碳固存能力,随后结合国土空间规划的主体功能区(MFA)进行研究。本研究对京津冀县域的碳平衡分区进行了优化。结果表明:①2002年、2011年和2020年,北京和天津县域的碳排放呈现“东南高西北低”的空间分布,高碳固存区域集中在张家口和承德县域的西北部。②ECC和ESC在空间分布上呈现出明显的空间异质性,ECC从北京向周边地区递减,且系数随年份增加而增大。ESC呈现出北高南低的空间分布,随着可持续发展战略的实施,其逐年有所改善。③结合主体功能分区后的县域碳平衡分区进一步细化为16个亚区,其中低碳维持区—重点生态功能区主要集中在西北部,分布范围较广但数量呈减少趋势。此外,经济发展区—农产品和碳汇发展区—农产品主产区的分布相对稳定,综合优化区—农产品主产区主要位于该区域的东南部,数量最多。这些研究结果为京津冀县域碳排放控制和经济发展分区提供了准确的数据支持。