Gao Tao, Chen Zhi-Yu, Li Tao, Lin Xu, Hu Hai-Gang, Tang Jian-Dong, Wu Chao
Orthopaedics of Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, 643000, Sichuan, China.
Respiratory Medicine of Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, 643000, Sichuan, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94606-w.
To explore the relationship between the Body Roundness Index (BRI) and the prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) among American adults, providing new insights for identifying OA and RA in adults. We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2023 and conducted a large cross-sectional study. BRI was calculated based on body measurements, while OA and RA cases were identified through questionnaires. Participants under 20 years of age and those with incomplete data were excluded. Weighted multivariate logistic regression models, restricted cubic spline (RCS) functions, and stratified analyses were used to assess the relationship between BRI levels and the prevalence of OA and RA in American adults. To further evaluate BRI's diagnostic potential for OA and RA, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to analyze and calculate the area under the curve (AUC). After screening, 17,544 participants were included, with 2,382 cases of OA (13.58%) and 987 cases of RA (5.63%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed a positive correlation between BRI and OA prevalence in American adults in both the unadjusted and adjusted models. A similar correlation was observed for RA in the unadjusted and partially adjusted models (P < 0.001), but the fully adjusted model showed no significant association between BRI and RA (P > 0.05). In the unadjusted model, the prevalence of OA in the highest BRI quartile was 3.47 times than that of the lowest quartile (95% CI: 2.84, 4.24, P < 0.001). Even in the fully adjusted model, the prevalence of OA in the highest BRI quartile remained 1.46 times higher than that of the lowest quartile (95% CI: 1.02, 2.08, P < 0.05). RCS curves demonstrated a non-linear relationship between BRI and both OA and RA, with a significant increase in prevalence as BRI levels rose (P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses and forest plots indicated a positive correlation between BRI and OA and RA in most subgroups (P < 0.05). ROC curves showed that BRI had a better predictive ability for OA and RA risk compared to BMI. There is a significant positive correlation between BRI and the prevalence of OA and RA in American adults, especially OA. Maintaining a lower BRI may help prevent the onset of OA and RA.
为探讨体圆度指数(BRI)与美国成年人骨关节炎(OA)和类风湿关节炎(RA)患病率之间的关系,为识别成年人OA和RA提供新见解。我们分析了2015 - 2023年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,并进行了一项大型横断面研究。BRI根据身体测量数据计算得出,而OA和RA病例通过问卷进行识别。排除20岁以下的参与者和数据不完整者。采用加权多因素逻辑回归模型、受限立方样条(RCS)函数和分层分析来评估BRI水平与美国成年人OA和RA患病率之间的关系。为进一步评估BRI对OA和RA的诊断潜力,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。经过筛选,纳入17544名参与者,其中OA病例2382例(13.58%),RA病例987例(5.6%)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,在未调整和调整模型中,美国成年人BRI与OA患病率均呈正相关。在未调整和部分调整模型中,RA也观察到类似的相关性(P < 0.001),但在完全调整模型中,BRI与RA之间无显著关联(P > 0.05)。在未调整模型中,BRI最高四分位数组的OA患病率是最低四分位数组的3.47倍(95% CI:2.84,4.24,P < 0.001)。即使在完全调整模型中,BRI最高四分位数组的OA患病率仍比最低四分位数组高1.46倍(95% CI:1.02,2.08,P < 0.05)。RCS曲线表明BRI与OA和RA均呈非线性关系,随着BRI水平升高,患病率显著增加(P < 0.001)。亚组分析和森林图表明,在大多数亚组中BRI与OA和RA呈正相关(P < 0.05)。ROC曲线显示,与BMI相比,BRI对OA和RA风险具有更好的预测能力。美国成年人中BRI与OA和RA患病率之间存在显著正相关,尤其是与OA。保持较低的BRI可能有助于预防OA和RA的发生。