Das K Nidhin, Sharma Vidhu, Tiwari Sarbesh, Goyal Amit
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):70-77. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02031-8. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
Anterior skull base (ASB) malignancies have conventionally been treated with craniofacial resection (CFR), yet this approach is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Recent advancements in endoscopic surgical techniques offer a promising alternative. This study aims to evaluate the morbidity, mortality, recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates of open CFR versus endoscopic CFR for ASB malignancies. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 24 patients who underwent surgery for sinonasal malignancies between January 2017 and July 2023. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical details, complications, and outcomes were assessed. Surgical procedures included endoscopic resection or open CFR. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Among 24 patients, 18 underwent CFR, with 13 receiving endoscopic CFR and 5 undergoing open CFR. Male predominance (mean age 40.8 years) and squamous cell carcinoma were common. Endoscopic CFR showed favorable outcomes in terms of visualization, bleeding, surgery duration, complications, and cosmesis compared to open CFR. All endoscopic patients underwent piecemeal resection, with 12 achieving negative margins. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered to all patients. Mean survival time was similar between endoscopic (709±5.5 days) and open (707±7 days) groups, with no significant difference in recurrence rates. Endoscopic CFR emerges as a feasible alternative to open CFR for ASB malignancies, offering comparable outcomes with reduced morbidity. Advancements in endoscopic techniques demonstrate promising results, highlighting the potential of endoscopic surgery in this complex anatomical region. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish endoscopic CFR as a standard approach for ASB malignancies.
传统上,前颅底(ASB)恶性肿瘤采用颅面切除术(CFR)进行治疗,但这种方法与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。内镜手术技术的最新进展提供了一种有前景的替代方案。本研究旨在评估开放性CFR与内镜下CFR治疗ASB恶性肿瘤的发病率、死亡率、复发率、转移率和生存率。对2017年1月至2023年7月期间接受鼻窦恶性肿瘤手术的24例患者进行了回顾性分析。评估了患者的人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征、手术细节、并发症和预后。手术方式包括内镜切除术或开放性CFR。采用Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验进行统计分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计生存率。在24例患者中,18例行CFR,其中13例接受内镜下CFR,5例行开放性CFR。男性居多(平均年龄40.8岁),常见为鳞状细胞癌。与开放性CFR相比,内镜下CFR在视野、出血、手术时间、并发症和美容效果方面显示出良好的结果。所有内镜手术患者均采用分块切除,12例切缘阴性。所有患者均接受术后放疗。内镜组(709±5.5天)和开放组(707±7天)的平均生存时间相似,复发率无显著差异。对于ASB恶性肿瘤,内镜下CFR是开放性CFR的一种可行替代方案,其疗效相当,但发病率较低。内镜技术的进展显示出有前景的结果,突出了内镜手术在这个复杂解剖区域的潜力。有必要进行进一步研究以验证这些发现,并将内镜下CFR确立为ASB恶性肿瘤的标准治疗方法。