• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Endoscopic Craniofacial Resection, an Emerging Epitome of Anterior Skull Base Tumor Resection.内镜颅面切除术,前颅底肿瘤切除的新兴典范。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):70-77. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02031-8. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
2
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
3
What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?膝关节弥漫型腱鞘巨细胞瘤患者行多入路关节镜下滑膜切除术的复发率、并发症及功能结局如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1218-1229. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002934. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
4
Composite Reconstruction With Irradiated Autograft Plus Total Hip Replacement After Type II Pelvic Resections for Tumors Is Feasible but Fraught With Complications.肿瘤Ⅱ型骨盆切除术后采用同种异体骨移植加全髋关节置换术进行复合重建是可行的,但并发症多。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1825-1835. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003097. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Endoscopic endonasal compared with anterior craniofacial and combined cranionasal resection of esthesioneuroblastomas.内镜经鼻与前颅面和颅鼻联合切除术治疗嗅神经母细胞瘤的比较。
World Neurosurg. 2013 Jul-Aug;80(1-2):148-59. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.003. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
7
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Updates in management strategies of locally advanced sinonasal malignancy.局部晚期鼻窦恶性肿瘤的治疗策略进展。
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Feb 1;31(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000866.
2
The contemporary management of cancers of the sinonasal tract in adults.成人鼻窦肿瘤的当代治疗方法。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):72-112. doi: 10.3322/caac.21752. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
3
Hadad-Bassagasteguy flap in skull base reconstruction - current reconstructive techniques and evaluation of criteria used for qualification for harvesting the flap.哈达德-巴萨加斯泰吉皮瓣在颅底重建中的应用——当前的重建技术及皮瓣切取资格标准的评估
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Apr;14(2):340-347. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.79633. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
Craniofacial resection of malignant tumors of the anterior skull base: a case series and a systematic review.颅面切除术治疗前颅底恶性肿瘤:病例系列及系统评价。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Dec;160(12):2339-2348. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3716-4. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
Minimally invasive endoscopic resection for the treatment of sinonasal malignancy: the outcomes and risk factors for recurrence.微创内镜切除术治疗鼻窦恶性肿瘤:疗效及复发危险因素
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 May 3;13:593-602. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S131185. eCollection 2017.
6
Endonasal Endoscopic Surgery in the Management of Sinonasal and Anterior Skull Base Malignancies.鼻内镜手术在鼻窦及前颅底恶性肿瘤治疗中的应用
Head Neck Pathol. 2016 Mar;10(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s12105-016-0687-8. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Efficacy of transnasal endoscopic resection for malignant anterior skull-base tumors.经鼻内镜切除前颅底恶性肿瘤的疗效。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012 Nov;2(6):487-95. doi: 10.1002/alr.21062. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
8
Endoscopic craniofacial resection. Indications and technical aspects.内镜颅面切除术。适应证及技术要点。
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2012 Nov-Dec;63(6):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
9
Endoscopic versus traditional craniofacial resection for patients with sinonasal tumors involving the anterior skull base.内镜与传统颅面切除术治疗累及前颅底的鼻腔鼻窦肿瘤患者的比较。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep;1(3):148-53. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.3.148. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
10
Endoscopic resection of advanced anterior skull base lesions: oncologically safe?晚期前颅底病变的内镜切除术:肿瘤学上安全吗?
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2009;71(3):123-8. doi: 10.1159/000209312. Epub 2009 Mar 24.

内镜颅面切除术,前颅底肿瘤切除的新兴典范。

Endoscopic Craniofacial Resection, an Emerging Epitome of Anterior Skull Base Tumor Resection.

作者信息

Das K Nidhin, Sharma Vidhu, Tiwari Sarbesh, Goyal Amit

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;16(1):70-77. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02031-8. Epub 2024 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1007/s13193-024-02031-8
PMID:40114904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11920459/
Abstract

Anterior skull base (ASB) malignancies have conventionally been treated with craniofacial resection (CFR), yet this approach is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Recent advancements in endoscopic surgical techniques offer a promising alternative. This study aims to evaluate the morbidity, mortality, recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates of open CFR versus endoscopic CFR for ASB malignancies. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 24 patients who underwent surgery for sinonasal malignancies between January 2017 and July 2023. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical details, complications, and outcomes were assessed. Surgical procedures included endoscopic resection or open CFR. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Among 24 patients, 18 underwent CFR, with 13 receiving endoscopic CFR and 5 undergoing open CFR. Male predominance (mean age 40.8 years) and squamous cell carcinoma were common. Endoscopic CFR showed favorable outcomes in terms of visualization, bleeding, surgery duration, complications, and cosmesis compared to open CFR. All endoscopic patients underwent piecemeal resection, with 12 achieving negative margins. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered to all patients. Mean survival time was similar between endoscopic (709±5.5 days) and open (707±7 days) groups, with no significant difference in recurrence rates. Endoscopic CFR emerges as a feasible alternative to open CFR for ASB malignancies, offering comparable outcomes with reduced morbidity. Advancements in endoscopic techniques demonstrate promising results, highlighting the potential of endoscopic surgery in this complex anatomical region. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish endoscopic CFR as a standard approach for ASB malignancies.

摘要

传统上,前颅底(ASB)恶性肿瘤采用颅面切除术(CFR)进行治疗,但这种方法与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。内镜手术技术的最新进展提供了一种有前景的替代方案。本研究旨在评估开放性CFR与内镜下CFR治疗ASB恶性肿瘤的发病率、死亡率、复发率、转移率和生存率。对2017年1月至2023年7月期间接受鼻窦恶性肿瘤手术的24例患者进行了回顾性分析。评估了患者的人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征、手术细节、并发症和预后。手术方式包括内镜切除术或开放性CFR。采用Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验进行统计分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计生存率。在24例患者中,18例行CFR,其中13例接受内镜下CFR,5例行开放性CFR。男性居多(平均年龄40.8岁),常见为鳞状细胞癌。与开放性CFR相比,内镜下CFR在视野、出血、手术时间、并发症和美容效果方面显示出良好的结果。所有内镜手术患者均采用分块切除,12例切缘阴性。所有患者均接受术后放疗。内镜组(709±5.5天)和开放组(707±7天)的平均生存时间相似,复发率无显著差异。对于ASB恶性肿瘤,内镜下CFR是开放性CFR的一种可行替代方案,其疗效相当,但发病率较低。内镜技术的进展显示出有前景的结果,突出了内镜手术在这个复杂解剖区域的潜力。有必要进行进一步研究以验证这些发现,并将内镜下CFR确立为ASB恶性肿瘤的标准治疗方法。