Alotaibi Faisal Faihan, Buti Jacopo, Rocchietta Isabella, Mohamed Nazari Nor Shafina, Almujaydil Rawan, D'Aiuto Francesco
Unit of Periodontology, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jul;36(7):787-801. doi: 10.1111/clr.14435. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
To systematically appraise the evidence on premature ridge resorption following various vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) techniques in healthy adult patients undergoing staged VRA procedures. The study aimed to identify VRA techniques resulting in the least premature bone resorption and to rank them using Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis (NMA).
Searches were conducted in six databases to identify randomised clinical trials (RCT) comparing staged VRA techniques with a minimum of 3 months follow-up. Relative premature bone resorption (PBR%) overall (primary) and in sites with uneventful versus complicated healing and need for additional bone grafting (NAG) (secondary) were chosen as outcomes. The risk of bias and certainty in evidence were assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 and GRADE tools. Bayesian models estimated treatment effects and rankings.
Ten RCTs, involving 220 participants and 236 defects, were included. Nine RCTs reported mean PBR%, with a range from 6% to 44%, averaging 26%. Seven treatment groups were evaluated: onlay, onlay + barrier, inlay, guided bone regeneration, distraction osteogenesis (DO), tissue expansion + tunnelling (TET), and cortical tenting. Eight RCTs, involving 160 participants and 176 defects, contributed to the NMA. Compared to onlay, all groups had lower mean PBR%. Inlay had the highest probability of being ranked first (Pr = 0.55), followed by DO (Pr = 0.27) and TET (Pr = 0.15). Healing complications significantly increased PBR% (MD 10%, 95% CrI 4.4-15.7).
VRA techniques preserving the periosteum (inlay, DO, and TET) exhibit less PBR compared with other techniques. When techniques involve full flap elevation, clinicians should anticipate volume loss at re-entry and consider greater grafting volumes to offset PBR. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42023394396; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=394396.
系统评价在接受分期垂直牙槽嵴增高术(VRA)的健康成年患者中,各种VRA技术后牙槽嵴过早吸收的证据。本研究旨在确定导致最少过早骨吸收的VRA技术,并使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)对其进行排序。
在六个数据库中进行检索,以识别比较分期VRA技术且随访至少3个月的随机临床试验(RCT)。选择总体(主要)以及愈合顺利与愈合复杂且需要额外植骨(NAG)部位的相对过早骨吸收(PBR%)作为结局指标。使用Cochrane RoB 2.0和GRADE工具评估证据的偏倚风险和确定性。贝叶斯模型估计治疗效果和排名。
纳入了10项RCT,涉及220名参与者和236个缺损。9项RCT报告了平均PBR%,范围为6%至44%,平均为26%。评估了7个治疗组:外置法、外置法+屏障膜、内置法、引导骨再生、牵张成骨(DO)、组织扩张+隧道技术(TET)和皮质帐篷技术。8项RCT,涉及160名参与者和176个缺损,纳入了NMA。与外置法相比,所有组的平均PBR%均较低。内置法排名第一的概率最高(Pr = 0.55),其次是DO(Pr = 0.27)和TET(Pr = 0.15)。愈合并发症显著增加PBR%(MD 10%,95% CrI 4.4 - 15.7)。
保留骨膜的VRA技术(内置法、DO和TET)与其他技术相比,PBR较少。当技术涉及全层瓣掀起时,临床医生应预期再次切开时的体积损失,并考虑增加植骨量以抵消PBR。方案注册:PROSPERO ID:CRD42023394396;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=394396。