Periodontol 2000. 2018 Jun;77(1):241-255. doi: 10.1111/prd.12218. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
The reconstruction of deficient alveolar ridges using vertical and/or horizontal guided bone regeneration techniques allows for ideal implant placement, which is crucial for function and also for esthetically successful outcomes. Unlike in the past, when meeting a patient's functional demands was sufficient, many patients now have greater expectations from their implant restoration. Hence, it is no longer enough simply to restore the edentulous space with a functioning tooth or teeth. It has been suggested that patients now measure their final restoration using the contralateral natural tooth as the gold standard. Both subjective and objective levels of patient information on dental implants have increased significantly in the last decade. As a result of this demand, implant literature has inherited and developed specific esthetic parameters and patient-centered outcomes from studies in the restorative field. Unfortunately, studies reporting on guided bone regeneration in the esthetic zone entirely lack such parameters and outcomes. Currently, there is a strong need for a consensus on objective and well-defined parameters to assess the esthetics in bone regeneration and subsequently on implant dentistry.
使用垂直和/或水平引导骨再生技术对牙槽骨缺损进行重建,可实现理想的种植体植入位置,这对功能和美学效果至关重要。与过去满足患者的功能需求就足够不同,现在许多患者对种植体修复的期望更高。因此,仅仅用功能牙或多颗牙来恢复缺牙间隙已经不够了。有人认为,现在患者使用对侧天然牙作为金标准来衡量最终修复体。在过去十年中,患者对种植牙的主观和客观信息都有了显著增加。由于这种需求,种植牙文献从修复领域的研究中继承和发展了特定的美学参数和以患者为中心的结果。不幸的是,完全缺乏有关美学区引导骨再生的此类参数和结果的研究报告。目前,非常需要就评估骨再生和随后的种植牙美学的客观和明确定义的参数达成共识。