Suppr超能文献

将数据有效性评估与更为复杂的欺诈问题区分开来。

Segregate Assessment of Data Validity from the More Complex Issue of Fraud.

作者信息

FitzGerald Garret A

机构信息

Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2025 Mar 21:1-3. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.42.

Abstract

Trust in the validity of published work is of fundamental importance to scientists. Confirmation of validity is more readily attained than addressing the question of whether fraud was involved. Suggestions are made for key stakeholders - institutions and companies, journals, and funders as to how they might enhance trust in science, both by accelerating the assessment of data validity and by segregating that effort from investigation of allegations of fraud.

摘要

对科学家来说,相信已发表作品的有效性至关重要。确认有效性比解决是否涉及欺诈的问题更容易实现。针对关键利益相关者——机构和公司、期刊以及资助者,就如何通过加快数据有效性评估以及将这项工作与欺诈指控调查分开,来增强对科学的信任提出了建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验