Suppr超能文献

欧洲心脏病学会临床实践指南推荐意见证据分级系统2024年修订版II:诊断试验和预测模型

2024 Revision of the level of evidence grading system for ESC clinical practice guideline recommendations II: diagnostic tests and prediction models.

作者信息

Di Angelantonio Emanuele, Pennells Lisa, Abdelhamid Magdy, Aboyans Victor, Asteggiano Riccardo, Čelutkienė Jelena, Grobbee Diederick E, Iung Bernard, Jüni Peter, McEvoy John William, Rakisheva Amina, Rossello Xavier, Visseren Frank L J, Baigent Colin, Prescott Eva B

机构信息

British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Papworth Road, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0BB, UK.

Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Heart and Lung Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Papworth Road, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0BB, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2025 May 21;46(20):1895-1906. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf016.

Abstract

The level of evidence (LOE) grading system for European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) classifies the quality of the evidence supporting a recommendation. However, the current taxonomy does not fully consider the optimal study design necessary to establish evidence for different types of recommendations in ESC guidelines. Therefore, two separate task forces of clinical and methodological experts were appointed by the CPG Committee, with the first tasked with updating the LOE grading system for therapy and prevention and the second responsible for developing a LOE grading system for diagnosis and prediction. This report from the second of these Task Forces develops a new system for diagnostic tests and prediction models which maintains the three-level grading structure to classify the quality of the evidence but introduces new definitions specific for diagnosis and prediction. For diagnostic tests, LOE A represents conclusive evidence of adequate diagnostic ability from at least two high-quality studies. Level of evidence B represents suggestive evidence from one high-quality or at least two moderate-quality studies. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence not classified as A or B, including evidence from less than two moderate-quality studies, or from expert consensus. For prediction models, LOE A represents conclusive evidence of adequate predictive ability from at least one high-quality derivation and two or more external validation studies of at least moderate quality. Level of evidence B represents suggestive evidence in one or more derivation studies and one or more external validation studies of at least moderate quality. Level of evidence C represents preliminary evidence not classified as A or B, including evidence from a derivation study of at least moderate quality, but with low quality or no external validation, or a derivation study of low quality.

摘要

欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)临床实践指南(CPG)的证据水平(LOE)分级系统对支持某项推荐意见的证据质量进行分类。然而,当前的分类法并未充分考虑为ESC指南中不同类型推荐意见确立证据所需的最佳研究设计。因此,CPG委员会任命了两个独立的临床和方法学专家工作组,第一个工作组负责更新治疗和预防方面的LOE分级系统,第二个工作组负责制定诊断和预测方面的LOE分级系统。本报告来自这些工作组中的第二个,它开发了一种用于诊断测试和预测模型的新系统,该系统保持三级分级结构以对证据质量进行分类,但引入了针对诊断和预测的新定义。对于诊断测试,证据水平A代表至少两项高质量研究得出的关于足够诊断能力的确凿证据。证据水平B代表来自一项高质量或至少两项中等质量研究的提示性证据。证据水平C代表未归类为A或B的初步证据,包括来自少于两项中等质量研究或专家共识的证据。对于预测模型,证据水平A代表至少一项高质量推导研究以及两项或更多项至少中等质量的外部验证研究得出的关于足够预测能力的确凿证据。证据水平B代表一项或多项推导研究以及一项或多项至少中等质量的外部验证研究中的提示性证据。证据水平C代表未归类为A或B的初步证据,包括来自至少中等质量但低质量或无外部验证的推导研究,或低质量的推导研究的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验