Cao Zhi, Min Jiahao, Xu Chenjie
Department of Psychiatry, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, No. 2318, Yuhangtang Road, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, 311121, China.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Mar 21;24(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02676-x.
The guidelines provided by the World Health Organization (WHO) recommend a minimum of 150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for optimal overall health benefits. However, it remains unclear whether there are differential effects on the risk of incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) between concentrated and evenly distributed physical activity (PA) patterns. We aimed to investigate the associations of accelerometer-derived weekend warrior and regularly active pattern with risk of T2D.
A total of 84,656 general participants from the UK Biobank with validated accelerometry data and free of T2D was included. Data on PA was collected using the Axivity AX3 wrist-based triaxial accelerometer worn for one week. Participants were categorized into three PA patterns: inactive (< 150 min/week of MVPA), weekend warrior (≥ 150 min/week with ≥ 50% of total MVPA occurring within 1-2 days), and regularly active (≥ 150 min/week but not meeting weekend warrior criteria).
During a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 2464 cases of T2D were documented. In multivariable-adjusted models, the weekend warrior pattern (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.84) and the regularly active pattern (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.94) exhibited a comparable lower risk of T2D compared to physically inactive participants. When stratified by genetic risk score (PRS) of T2D, the weekend warrior pattern was associated with T2D in the higher PRS group (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91), intermediate PRS group (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.97) and lowest PRS group (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80).
Engaging in the weekend warrior pattern is associated with a similarly lower risk of T2D to the regularly active pattern, even among individuals with high genetic risk. These findings highlight the weekend warrior pattern as a significant and flexible alternative in preventive intervention strategies for T2D, particularly for those unable to maintain daily activity routines.
世界卫生组织(WHO)提供的指南建议,为获得最佳的整体健康效益,每周至少进行150分钟的中等至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)。然而,集中式和均匀分布的身体活动(PA)模式对2型糖尿病(T2D)发病风险的影响是否存在差异仍不清楚。我们旨在研究通过加速度计得出的周末战士型和经常运动型PA模式与T2D风险之间的关联。
纳入了来自英国生物银行的84656名一般参与者,他们拥有经过验证的加速度计数据且无T2D。使用佩戴一周的Axivity AX3腕式三轴加速度计收集PA数据。参与者被分为三种PA模式:不活动(每周MVPA<150分钟)、周末战士型(每周≥150分钟且总MVPA的≥50%在1 - 2天内完成)和经常运动型(每周≥150分钟但不符合周末战士型标准)。
在中位随访8.4年期间,记录了2464例T2D病例。在多变量调整模型中,与身体不活动的参与者相比,周末战士型模式(风险比[HR] 0.75;95%置信区间[CI] 0.67 - 0.84)和经常运动型模式(HR 0.80,95% CI 0.69 - 0.94)的T2D风险同样较低。按T2D的遗传风险评分(PRS)分层时,周末战士型模式与高PRS组(HR 0.78,95% CI 0.67 - 0.91)、中PRS组(HR 0.78,95% CI 0.62 - 0.97)和低PRS组(HR 0.59,95% CI 0.43 - 0.80)的T2D相关。
即使在遗传风险高的个体中,采用周末战士型模式与经常运动型模式的T2D风险同样较低。这些发现突出了周末战士型模式作为T2D预防干预策略中一种重要且灵活的替代方式,特别是对于那些无法维持日常活动习惯的人。