Ponce Rovingaile Kriska M, Verma Karina, Gergen-Barnett Katherine, Brimhall Kimberly, Ko Naomi Y
Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Community Health. 2025 Mar 23. doi: 10.1007/s10900-025-01462-w.
Cancer disparities among populations in the United States are a persistent and ongoing challenge. Medical mistrust (MM), or the tendency to distrust individuals and systems even at the cost of one's own well-being, has been implicated in contributing to worse health outcomes. Thus, understanding the relationship between MM and cancer care disparities may inform effective interventions to improve outcomes for all. We conducted a two-step review: (1) a standard review to examine the relationship between MM and the cancer continuum of care, and (2) a systematic review to assess interventions targeted to mitigate MM in cancer care. The standard review included eleven studies, which revealed that MM impacted cancer screening, treatment adherence, clinical trial participation, and access to social support. Key mediators of MM included patient-provider discordance, health-related and sociodemographic-related discrimination, perceptions of Western medicine, low quality care, and health insurance. Our systematic review yielded twelve interventions-67% tailored towards screening, 17% towards patient navigation services, and 17% towards clinical trial participation. Key methods included adapting patient-centered (e.g. gathering patient perspectives, increasing racial and ethnic representation) and community-based approaches (e.g. use of churches and training family members to disseminate patient education) to overall create culturally tailored interventions against MM across the cancer continuum of care.
美国不同人群之间的癌症差异是一个持续存在且不断发展的挑战。医疗不信任(MM),即即使以自身健康为代价也不信任个人和医疗系统的倾向,被认为会导致更差的健康结果。因此,了解MM与癌症护理差异之间的关系可能有助于制定有效的干预措施,以改善所有人的治疗结果。我们进行了两步审查:(1)一项标准审查,以研究MM与癌症护理连续过程之间的关系;(2)一项系统审查,以评估旨在减轻癌症护理中MM的干预措施。标准审查包括11项研究,这些研究表明MM影响癌症筛查、治疗依从性、临床试验参与以及获得社会支持。MM的关键中介因素包括医患不一致、与健康和社会人口统计学相关的歧视、对西医的看法、低质量护理以及医疗保险。我们的系统审查产生了12项干预措施——67%针对筛查,17%针对患者导航服务,17%针对临床试验参与。关键方法包括采用以患者为中心的方法(例如收集患者观点、增加种族和族裔代表性)和基于社区的方法(例如利用教堂以及培训家庭成员传播患者教育),以在癌症护理连续过程中全面创建针对MM的文化定制干预措施。