• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向参与肺癌早期检测筛查的黑人男性的公民科学家教育课程的初步评估。

Preliminary Evaluation of a Citizen Scientist Educational Curriculum Aimed at Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Early Detection Screening.

机构信息

College of Nursing, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Project Brotherhood, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Am J Mens Health. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):15579883221099417. doi: 10.1177/15579883221099417.

DOI:10.1177/15579883221099417
PMID:35694882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9201322/
Abstract

This article describes an educational program to engage African American men as citizen scientists (CSs) and future research partners in a lung cancer screening project. We provide an overview of the curriculum used, the structure and format of the educational sessions, and associated educational outcomes. Furthermore, we describe lessons learned in the engagement of African American men as CS in community-based lung-health equity research. The CS educational program included five group-based sessions delivered through zoom. The educational curriculum was adapted from the University of Florida Citizen Scientist program and tailored to address lung health and the contextual experiences of African American men. Each session lasted 90 minutes. Pre- and post-test measures were collected to examine changes in knowledge, comfort, health literacy, research interests, and medical mistrust. Eight African American men completed the CS educational program. Attendance rates were high for each session (100%). Seven participants completed additional human subject research certification. Improvements were observed from pre- to post-test in participants' level of knowledge, comfort, and health literacy but not medical mistrust. CS reported the most interest in participating in research aimed to identify important community strengths and problems. Study findings suggest that it was feasible to deliver an online citizen scientist educational program designed to prepare participants to serve as partners in a lung cancer screening intervention for African American men. Results suggest the educational program has the potential to improve key outcomes including completion of regulatory training and increased research-related knowledge, comfort, and health literacy.

摘要

这篇文章描述了一个教育项目,旨在让非裔美国男性作为公民科学家(CS)并成为未来的研究合作伙伴,参与肺癌筛查项目。我们提供了课程的概述、教育课程的结构和格式以及相关的教育成果。此外,我们还描述了在让非裔美国男性作为社区肺部健康公平研究的 CS 参与方面的经验教训。公民科学家教育计划包括五个通过 zoom 进行的小组课程。教育课程改编自佛罗里达大学的公民科学家计划,并针对解决肺部健康和非裔美国男性的背景经历进行了调整。每个课程持续 90 分钟。收集了预测试和后测试措施,以检查知识、舒适度、健康素养、研究兴趣和医疗不信任度的变化。八名非裔美国男性完成了公民科学家教育计划。每个课程的出勤率都很高(100%)。七名参与者完成了额外的人类主体研究认证。从预测试到后测试,参与者的知识、舒适度和健康素养水平都有所提高,但医疗不信任度没有提高。CS 报告说最有兴趣参与旨在确定重要社区优势和问题的研究。研究结果表明,在线公民科学家教育计划的实施是可行的,该计划旨在使参与者能够成为肺癌筛查干预措施的合作伙伴,服务于非裔美国男性。结果表明,该教育计划有可能改善关键成果,包括完成监管培训以及增加与研究相关的知识、舒适度和健康素养。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a45/9201322/9b3804239823/10.1177_15579883221099417-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a45/9201322/9b3804239823/10.1177_15579883221099417-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a45/9201322/9b3804239823/10.1177_15579883221099417-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Preliminary Evaluation of a Citizen Scientist Educational Curriculum Aimed at Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Early Detection Screening.面向参与肺癌早期检测筛查的黑人男性的公民科学家教育课程的初步评估。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):15579883221099417. doi: 10.1177/15579883221099417.
2
The SHARED Project: A Novel Approach to Engaging African American Men to Address Lung Cancer Disparities.SHARED 项目:一种新方法,旨在让非裔美国男性参与,以解决肺癌的差异问题。
Am J Mens Health. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):1557988320958934. doi: 10.1177/1557988320958934.
3
Florida-California Cancer Health Equity Center (CaRE) Community Scientist Research Advocacy Program.佛罗里达-加利福尼亚癌症健康公平中心(CaRE)社区科学家研究倡导计划。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1429-1439. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02351-3. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
4
Engaging African American Men as Citizen Scientists to Validate a Prostate Cancer Biomarker: Work-in-Progress.让非裔美国男性作为公民科学家参与验证前列腺癌生物标志物:正在进行的工作。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):103-112. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0043.
5
Modeling intrinsic factors of inclusive engagement in citizen science: Insights from the participants' survey analysis of CSI-COP.对公民科学包容性参与的内在因素进行建模:CSI-COP 参与者调查分析的见解。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294575. eCollection 2023.
6
Promoting informed prostate cancer screening decision-making for African American men in a community-based setting.在社区环境中促进非裔美国男性进行明智的前列腺癌筛查决策。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Apr;33(4):503-514. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01544-9. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
7
Impact of a Culturally Tailored Education Intervention for African-American and Appalachian Men in Ohio.俄亥俄州针对非裔美国人和阿巴拉契亚男性的文化定制教育干预的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1389-1400. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01970-y. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
8
Addressing the challenge of informed decision making in prostate cancer community outreach to African American men.解决在向非裔美国男性进行前列腺癌社区外展中知情决策的挑战。
Am J Mens Health. 2011 Nov;5(6):508-16. doi: 10.1177/1557988311411909. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
A Model for Engaging Citizen Scientists: A Community-Partnered Research Collaboration to Address Inequities for Black Birthing People.一个让公民科学家参与的模式:一个社区伙伴研究合作,以解决黑人产妇的不平等问题。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Sep;28(9):1495-1505. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03974-8. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
10
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of Medical Mistrust Across the Cancer Continuum of Care and Current Interventions.癌症连续护理过程中医疗不信任及当前干预措施综述
J Community Health. 2025 Mar 23. doi: 10.1007/s10900-025-01462-w.
2
Exploration of experiences and attitudes associated with lung health promotion among Black males with a history of smoking.对有吸烟史的黑人男性在肺部健康促进方面的经历和态度的探索。
J Mens Health. 2024 Jan;20(1):20-34. doi: 10.22514/jomh.2024.005. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Bridging the Gap: Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Research Through Barbershop Collaboration.

本文引用的文献

1
Are sex disparities in COVID-19 a predictable outcome of failing men's health provision?新冠疫情中存在的性别差异是否是男性健康供给失败所导致的可预见后果?
Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Jan;19(1):47-63. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00535-4. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to Informed Decision-Making About Prostate Cancer Screening Among Black Men.黑人男性前列腺癌筛查决策的障碍和促进因素。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Sep-Oct;34(5):925-936. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.05.210149.
3
Improving Recruitment, Retention, and Cultural Saliency of Health Promotion Efforts Targeting African American Men: A Scoping Review.
弥合差距:通过理发店合作让黑人男性参与肺癌研究
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Jan-Feb;18(1):15579883241229417. doi: 10.1177/15579883241229417.
4
Florida-California Cancer Health Equity Center (CaRE) Community Scientist Research Advocacy Program.佛罗里达-加利福尼亚癌症健康公平中心(CaRE)社区科学家研究倡导计划。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1429-1439. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02351-3. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
5
Crowdsourcing to support training for public health: A scoping review.众包支持公共卫生培训:一项范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jul 26;3(7):e0002202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002202. eCollection 2023.
6
Tackling Gynecologic Cancer Disparities: An Assessment of 2 Interventions for Improving Information Exchange With Racial/Ethnic Communities.解决妇科癌症差异问题:评估两种改善与种族/族裔社区信息交流的干预措施。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar 1;66(1):43-52. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000742. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
提高针对非裔美国男性的健康促进工作的招募、保留和文化凸显度:一项范围综述。
Ann Behav Med. 2022 Jun 29;56(6):605-619. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab079.
4
Recruitment, Retention, and Intervention Outcomes from the Dedicated African American Dad (DAAD) Study.《专注于非裔美国爸爸(DAAD)研究的招募、保留和干预结果》。
J Urban Health. 2021 Oct;98(Suppl 2):133-148. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00549-8. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
The Impact of Residential Racial Segregation on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes.居住种族隔离对非小细胞肺癌治疗和结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):1291-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.096. Epub 2021 May 23.
6
Citizen Science, Education, and Learning: Challenges and Opportunities.公民科学、教育与学习:挑战与机遇
Front Sociol. 2020 Dec 2;5:613814. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.613814. eCollection 2020.
7
Participatory innovation for human papillomavirus screening to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer.通过参与式创新进行人乳头瘤病毒筛查以加速消除宫颈癌。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e582-e583. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30522-2.
8
Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening in African-American Men.非裔美国男性结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Feb;67(2):463-472. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06960-0. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
9
Ethics of research at the intersection of COVID-19 and black lives matter: a call to action.新冠疫情与“黑人的命也是命”运动交叉领域的研究伦理:行动呼吁
J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107054.
10
The Expanding Digital Divide: Digital Health Access Inequities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City.不断扩大的数字鸿沟:纽约市新冠疫情期间数字健康获取的不平等现象
J Urban Health. 2021 Apr;98(2):183-186. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00508-9. Epub 2021 Jan 20.