Combined TACE with Targeted and Immunotherapy versus TACE Alone Improves DFS in HCC with MVI: A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Study.

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with microvascular invasion (MVI) is associated with high recurrence and poor survival outcomes. Although adjuvant therapies such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), targeted therapy, and immunotherapy show potential in improving outcomes, the optimal postoperative treatment strategy remains undetermined. This study evaluates the efficacy of different adjuvant treatments on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in HCC patients with MVI following curative resection.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 409 HCC patients with MVI who underwent curative resection from three clinical centers between 2017 and 2024 was analyzed. Patients were stratified into three groups: TACE alone (n=132), TACE + targeted therapy (n=58), and TACE + targeted immunotherapy (n=68). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were used to assess DFS and OS. A nomogram was constructed for individualized DFS prediction.

RESULTS

After PSM, both the TACE + targeted therapy and TACE + targeted immunotherapy groups exhibited significantly prolonged DFS compared to TACE alone (median DFS: 16 vs 22 and 21 months, respectively; p=0.027). No significant differences were observed in OS across the groups. The nomogram for DFS demonstrated robust predictive performance, with a C-index of 0.709 and 0.645 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, supporting its utility in clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSION

In HCC patients with MVI, adjuvant TACE combined with targeted therapy or targeted immunotherapy significantly enhances DFS, though no OS benefit was observed. The developed nomogram provides a reliable tool for risk stratification and personalized postoperative management in this high-risk patient population.