• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前环境中高危患者的拒绝——临床与法律考量

High-Risk Patient Refusals in the Prehospital Setting-Clinical and Legal Considerations.

作者信息

McNeilly Bryan, Maggiore W Ann, Goebel Mat, O'Brien Michael, Cozzi Nicholas, Ariyaprakai Navin, Lardaro Thomas, Weinstock Michael

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Mar 5;6(2):100083. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100083. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100083
PMID:40125342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11927591/
Abstract

When emergency medical service (EMS) arrives on the scene, it is estimated that patients end up declining treatment and/or transport around 5% to 10% of the time. When a patient is suspected of having a life-threatening emergency and declines care, these cases are deemed "high-risk refusals," as the subsequent delay in treatment drastically increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as the legal risk for all those involved. These cases warrant careful consideration and deliberate training, not only among EMS professionals and EMS medical directors but also among any in-hospital physicians providing online medical oversight. To mitigate the risk associated with high-risk refusals, EMS systems and emergency departments should have standardized policies and guidelines in place for managing these cases, just as with any other complex, high-risk procedure. State statutes should be referenced and ideally legal counsel should be consulted when developing these guidelines. Checklists and quick references are recommended, and calling online medical supervision should be strongly encouraged. EMS medical directors should also routinely review high-risk refusal charts and include these cases in their ongoing quality improvement and quality assessment efforts.

摘要

当紧急医疗服务(EMS)抵达现场时,据估计患者最终拒绝治疗和/或转运的情况约占5%至10%。当怀疑患者患有危及生命的紧急情况且拒绝治疗时,这些病例被视为“高风险拒绝”,因为随后的治疗延迟会大幅增加发病和死亡风险,以及所有相关人员的法律风险。这些病例不仅需要紧急医疗服务专业人员和紧急医疗服务医疗主任仔细考虑和审慎培训,也需要任何提供在线医疗监督的医院内科医生进行相关培训。为降低与高风险拒绝相关的风险,紧急医疗服务系统和急诊科应制定标准化政策和指南来处理这些情况,就如同处理任何其他复杂的高风险程序一样。制定这些指南时应参考州法规,理想情况下应咨询法律顾问。建议使用检查表和快速参考资料,并强烈鼓励呼叫在线医疗监督。紧急医疗服务医疗主任还应定期审查高风险拒绝图表,并将这些病例纳入其持续的质量改进和质量评估工作中。

相似文献

1
High-Risk Patient Refusals in the Prehospital Setting-Clinical and Legal Considerations.院前环境中高危患者的拒绝——临床与法律考量
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Mar 5;6(2):100083. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100083. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Factors Associated With Voluntary Refusal of Emergency Medical System Transport for Emergency Care in Detroit During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.与 COVID-19 大流行早期底特律紧急医疗系统自愿拒绝紧急护理转运相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120728. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20728.
3
Against all advice: an analysis of out-of-hospital refusals of care.违背所有建议:院外拒绝治疗情况分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Nov;42(5):689-96. doi: 10.1016/S0196064403005249.
4
Adequacy of online medical command communication and emergency medical services documentation of informed refusals.在线医疗指挥通信的充分性以及知情拒绝的紧急医疗服务文件记录。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):970-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.004.
5
Disparities in Emergency Medical Services Time Intervals for Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: Findings from the North Carolina Prehospital Medical Information System.疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的急救医疗服务时间差异:来自北卡罗来纳州院前医疗信息系统的研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019305. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019305. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
The preparedness of schools to respond to emergencies in children: a national survey of school nurses.学校应对儿童紧急情况的准备情况:一项针对学校护士的全国性调查。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e738-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1474.
7
Prehospital refusal-of-transport policies: adequate legal protection?院前拒绝转运政策:是否有足够的法律保护?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000 Jan-Mar;4(1):53-6. doi: 10.1080/10903120090941650.
8
Factors associated with EMS transport decisions for pediatric patients after motor vehicle collisions.与机动车碰撞后儿科患者接受 EMS 转运决策相关的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020 Oct 12;21(sup1):S60-S65. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1830382. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Outcomes of patients not transported after calling 911.拨打911后未被转运患者的结局。
J Emerg Med. 2005 May;28(4):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.11.025.
10
[Analgesia in the emergency medical service: comparison between tele-emergency physician and call back procedure with respect to application safety, effectiveness and tolerance].[急诊医疗服务中的镇痛:远程急诊医生与回电程序在应用安全性、有效性和耐受性方面的比较]
Anaesthesist. 2019 Oct;68(10):665-675. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00661-0. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The capacity to consent to treatment is altered in suicidal patients.自杀患者同意治疗的能力会发生改变。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 9;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12991-023-00459-w.
2
EMS Care of Adult Hospice Patients- a Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP and AAHPM.NAEMSP 和 AAHPM 关于成人临终关怀患者的 EMS 护理:立场声明和资源文件。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(5):560-565. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2193978. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
3
The Menegazzi Scientific Sessions: Research Abstracts from the 2023 National Association of EMS Physicians Annual Meeting.梅内加齐科学会议:2023年美国急诊医疗服务医师协会年会研究摘要
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(sup1):S1-S96. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2138658. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
4
Prehospital Intranasal Glucagon for Hypoglycemia.院前低血糖应用鼻内胰高血糖素
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(3):356-359. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2045406. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
Implied Consent in Treating Psychiatric Emergencies.治疗精神科急症中的默示同意。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 13;11:127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00127. eCollection 2020.
6
Improving Decisions About Transport to the Emergency Department for Assisted Living Residents Who Fall.改善对跌倒的辅助生活居民转往急诊科的决策。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 6;168(3):179-186. doi: 10.7326/M17-0969. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
Morbidity and Mortality Associated with Prehospital "Lift-assist" Calls.与院前“抬升辅助”呼叫相关的发病率和死亡率。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):556-562. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308607. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity.医疗决策能力评估
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;31(6):530-40. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw051. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
9
Depression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: a systematic review.抑郁与治疗或研究决策能力:系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Dec 13;14:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-54.
10
Medical-legal Issues in the Agitated Patient: Cases and Caveats.躁动患者的医疗法律问题:案例与注意事项
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;14(5):559-65. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.4.16132.