Tan Xia, Yao Liwen, Dong Zehua, Li Yanxia, Yu Yuanjie, Gao Xin, Zhu Kai, Su Wenhao, Yin Haisen, Wang Wen, Luo Chaijie, Li Jialing, You Hang, Hu Huiyan, Zhou Wei, Yu Honggang
Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 25;16(6):e00839. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000839. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
The completeness of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a prerequisite for detecting lesions. This study aims to explore whether the quality of complete examinations assisted by artificial intelligence (AI) would be comparable with those conducted within the guideline-recommended inspection time.
Patients referred for diagnostic, screening, or surveillance EGD were enrolled at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. In the AI-assisted group, endoscopists completed observation of the entire upper gastrointestinal tract with AI assistance. In the control group, endoscopists were instructed to spend no less than 7 minutes on each procedure. The primary outcome was the detection rate of neoplastic lesions. Noninferiority was confirmed when the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was greater than the margin of -1.5%.
A total of 1,723 patients were prospectively enrolled between July 3, 2023, and April 7, 2024. Seven hundred ninety-six and 763 patients in the AI-assisted and control groups were included in the final analysis, respectively. The detection rates of neoplastic lesions in the AI-assisted and control groups were 3.14% and 2.36%, respectively, resulting in an absolute proportion difference of 0.78% (95% CI -0.58% to 2.14%; odds ratio 1.342 [95% CI 0.726-2.480]). The median inspection time was reduced by 1.5 minutes in the AI-assisted group (6.18 [2.87] vs 7.70 [1.90], P < 0.001).
Inspection time of complete EGD can be significantly shortened by AI without compromising its quality. These findings provide crucial evidence to support that AI-assisted procedural completeness serves as an objective and effective quality indicator for EGD.
食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的完整性是检测病变的前提条件。本研究旨在探讨人工智能(AI)辅助下的完整检查质量是否与在指南推荐的检查时间内进行的检查质量相当。
武汉大学人民医院招募了因诊断、筛查或监测EGD而就诊的患者。患者按1:1的比例随机分为两组。在AI辅助组中,内镜医师在AI的辅助下完成对上消化道的全面观察。在对照组中,指示内镜医师在每个操作上花费不少于7分钟。主要结局是肿瘤性病变的检出率。当95%置信区间(CI)的下限大于-1.5%的界值时,确认非劣效性。
在2023年7月3日至2024年4月7日期间,前瞻性地共纳入了1723例患者。最终分析分别纳入了AI辅助组和对照组的796例和763例患者。AI辅助组和对照组肿瘤性病变的检出率分别为3.14%和2.36%,绝对比例差异为0.78%(95%CI -0.58%至2.14%;优势比1.342 [95%CI 0.726 - 2.480])。AI辅助组的中位检查时间缩短了1.5分钟(6.18 [2.87] 对7.70 [1.90],P < 0.001)。
AI可显著缩短完整EGD的检查时间,且不影响其质量。这些发现提供了关键证据,支持AI辅助的操作完整性可作为EGD客观有效的质量指标。