Okuno Kyoko, Kawabata Hidehiko, Tamura Daisuke, Higuchi Chikahisa
Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital.
Osaka Rehabilitation Hospital for Children, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2025 Aug 1;45(7):e637-e640. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002957. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
Obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a common birth injury, generally presenting as upper limb paralysis at birth. While diagnosis is straightforward when associated with known risk factors, misdiagnoses can nevertheless occur. This study aimed to elucidate the process of differential diagnosis for OBPP by analyzing cases of suspected OBPP, ultimately diagnosed with other conditions.
We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients under 1 year of age presenting with suspected or previously diagnosed OBPP at 2 tertiary childrens' centers in Osaka between 1994 and 2021. Cases were divided into the OBPP and non-OBPP groups, according to the final diagnosis, for comparison of demographic data and physical findings, to determine the clinical course that could be used to differentiate non-OBPP from OBPP.
Of the 414 enrolled cases, 387 (93%) were confirmed as OBPP, while 27 (7%) were diagnosed with other conditions. Statistically significant differences were found in gestational age, birth weight, and age of first visit, between the 2 groups, although these were not clinically meaningful for differential diagnosis. Shoulder dystocia was observed in 54% of OBPP cases, but not in non-OBPP cases. The key characteristics of OBPP included paralysis from birth, paralysis following an anatomic distribution, and paralysis that gradually improved without worsening. Conversely, joint contracture immediately after birth was a key indicator for ruling out OBPP. Using these criteria, 24 of 27 suspected cases were excluded from OBPP diagnosis. Of the remaining 3 cases, spinal cord infarction was detected on MRI in 1 case. In the remaining 2 cases, although normal MRI and surgical findings could rule out OBPP, a definite diagnosis could not be made.
This study highlights that accurate OBPP diagnosis requires careful verification of specific characteristics. If these characteristics are not met, OBPP becomes less likely, and diagnostic uncertainty persists. An MRI of the brachial plexus is needed in such cases.
Level III-retrospective cohort study.
产科臂丛神经麻痹(OBPP)是一种常见的分娩损伤,通常在出生时表现为上肢麻痹。虽然与已知风险因素相关时诊断很直接,但仍可能发生误诊。本研究旨在通过分析疑似OBPP但最终诊断为其他疾病的病例,阐明OBPP的鉴别诊断过程。
我们回顾了1994年至2021年期间在大阪的2家三级儿童中心就诊的1岁以下疑似或先前诊断为OBPP的患者的电子病历。根据最终诊断将病例分为OBPP组和非OBPP组,比较人口统计学数据和体格检查结果,以确定可用于区分非OBPP和OBPP的临床过程。
在纳入的414例病例中,387例(93%)被确诊为OBPP,27例(7%)被诊断为其他疾病。两组之间在胎龄、出生体重和首次就诊年龄方面存在统计学显著差异,尽管这些差异在鉴别诊断中没有临床意义。54%的OBPP病例观察到肩难产,而非OBPP病例未观察到。OBPP的关键特征包括出生时即出现麻痹、按解剖分布的麻痹以及逐渐改善而无恶化的麻痹。相反,出生后立即出现关节挛缩是排除OBPP的关键指标。使用这些标准,27例疑似病例中有24例被排除在OBPP诊断之外。在其余3例中,1例MRI检查发现脊髓梗死。在其余2例中,尽管MRI和手术结果正常可排除OBPP,但仍无法做出明确诊断。
本研究强调准确的OBPP诊断需要仔细核实特定特征。如果不满足这些特征,则患OBPP的可能性较小,且诊断仍存在不确定性。在这种情况下需要进行臂丛神经MRI检查。
III级——回顾性队列研究。