Suppr超能文献

使用大蒜生物测定法评估两种生物杀虫剂的致断裂和非整倍体作用。

Evaluation of Clastogenic and Aneugenic Action of Two Bio-Insecticides Using Allium Bioassay.

作者信息

Duta-Cornescu Georgiana, Dugala Maria Liliana, Constantin Nicoleta, Pojoga Maria-Daniela, Simon-Gruita Alexandra

机构信息

Genetics Department, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Intrarea Portocalelor 1-3, Sector 6, 060101 Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

J Xenobiot. 2025 Feb 27;15(2):35. doi: 10.3390/jox15020035.

Abstract

It is well known that modern agriculture would not be able to meet the current demand for food without the help of pesticides. However, conventional pesticides have been proven to be extremely harmful to the environment, to the species they are applied to, and, ultimately, to humans. As a result, bio-pesticides have been introduced in recent years and include natural substances that control pests, such as biochemical pesticides, microorganisms used as pest control agents (microbial pesticides), and pesticide substances produced by plants containing added genetic material, known as plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs). Although these are natural products, their widespread use has led to an increased presence in the environment, raising concerns regarding their potential impact on both the environment and human health. The aim of our study was to determine the phyto- and cytogenotoxicity caused by two insecticides, both certified for use in ecological agriculture: one biochemical (BCP) and the other microbial (MP), which were applied in three concentrations (the maximum recommended concentration by the manufacturers (MRFC), 1.5X MRFC, and 2X MRFC) to the meristematic root tissues of . The results were compared to a negative control (tap water) and a positive control (a chemical pesticide (CP) containing mainly Deltamethrin). Phytotoxic and cytogenotoxic effects were analyzed at two time intervals (24 and 48 h) by measuring root length, growth percentage, root growth inhibition percentage (phytotoxicity tests), and micronuclei frequency and chromosome aberrations (anaphase bridges, chromosomal fragments, anaphase delays, sticky chromosomes, laggard/vagrant chromosomes) (cytogenotoxicity analyses), respectively. The tests conducted in this study showed that the microbial insecticide provides greater safety when applied, even at higher doses than those recommended by the manufacturers, compared with the biochemical insecticide, whose effects are similar to those induced by the chemical pesticide containing Deltamethrin. However, the results suggest that both insecticides have clastogenic and aneugenic effects, highlighting the need for prior testing of any type of pesticide before large-scale use, especially since the results of the tests showed high sensitivity and good correlation when compared to other test systems, e.g., mammals.

摘要

众所周知,没有农药的帮助,现代农业将无法满足当前的粮食需求。然而,传统农药已被证明对环境、施用对象物种以及最终对人类都极其有害。因此,近年来引入了生物农药,包括控制害虫的天然物质,如生化农药、用作害虫防治剂的微生物(微生物农药)以及含有添加遗传物质的植物产生的农药物质,即植物内保护剂(PIPs)。尽管这些是天然产物,但它们的广泛使用导致其在环境中的存在增加,引发了对其对环境和人类健康潜在影响的担忧。我们研究的目的是确定两种均被认证可用于生态农业的杀虫剂所引起的植物毒性和细胞遗传毒性:一种是生化杀虫剂(BCP),另一种是微生物杀虫剂(MP),它们以三种浓度(制造商推荐的最大浓度(MRFC)、1.5倍MRFC和2倍MRFC)施用于[植物名称]的分生组织根组织。将结果与阴性对照(自来水)和阳性对照(一种主要含有溴氰菊酯的化学农药(CP))进行比较。分别在两个时间间隔(24小时和48小时)通过测量根长、生长百分比、根生长抑制百分比(植物毒性测试)以及微核频率和染色体畸变(后期桥、染色体片段、后期延迟、粘性染色体、落后/游荡染色体)(细胞遗传毒性分析)来分析植物毒性和细胞遗传毒性作用。本研究进行的测试表明,与生化杀虫剂相比,微生物杀虫剂在施用时即使剂量高于制造商推荐剂量也具有更高的安全性,生化杀虫剂的效果与含有溴氰菊酯的化学农药诱导的效果相似。然而,结果表明这两种杀虫剂都有致断裂和致非整倍体效应,突出了在大规模使用任何类型的农药之前进行预先测试的必要性,特别是因为与其他测试系统(如哺乳动物)相比,[测试名称]测试结果显示出高灵敏度和良好的相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce3/11932292/74e7f3c33c91/jox-15-00035-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验