• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估健康促进素养量表的结构效度:台湾大学社会责任背景下的验证性因素分析

Evaluating the construct validity of the health promotion literacy scale: a confirmatory factor analysis in Taiwan's university social responsibility context.

作者信息

Wang Yu-Ming, Hung Chia-Hui, Li Yi-Ching, Ho Yung-Chuan, Huang Cheng-Yi

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, 40201, Taiwan.

Clinical Psychological Room, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 40201, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06992-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06992-4
PMID:40128825
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11931782/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The development of a Health Promotion Literacy Scale within the USR Curriculum is crucial for addressing the existing gap in measuring the impact of USR on students' citizenship and social engagement. This study aimed to develop and assess the psychometric properties of the Health Promotion Literacy-based Scale in USR (HPLS-USR) scale on medical university students through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in Taiwan.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study and recruited a convenience sample of 405 students in central Taiwan. The HPLS-USR scale, developed by Hung et al. in 2022, comprises four factors-personal growth, responsibility of citizenship, social interaction, and intellectual development-that together accounted for 61.83% of the total variance. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26 and AMOS (version 22.0) to perform a CFA to verify the model's goodness of fit.

RESULTS

The modified model derived 17 items in 3 factors, with 51.02% of the total variance explained. The structural equation model displayed a good fit, suggesting that personal growth, responsibility for citizenship, and social interaction were latent variables of the Health Promotion Literacy-based Scale on a USR curriculum. The Cronbach's alphas for the overall scale and the three subscales ranged from 0.82 to 0.93. The psychometric properties of the scale demonstrated good to excellent model fit in the CMIN/DF (χ2/df) = 3.149, GFI = 0.91, AGFI = 0.88, SRMR = 0.04, RMSEA = 0.07, NFI = 0.90, NNFI = 0.92, RFI = 0.89, IFI = 0.93, CFI = 0.93, PNFI = 0.78, and PCFI = 0.81. The Cronbach's alphas ranged between.81 and.89; the composite alphas ranged between.87 and.94.

CONCLUSION

This study provides preliminary construct validity evidence for the HPLS-USR scale, a robust and psychometrically sound instrument for assessing health promotion literacy among USR students.

摘要

引言

在美国研究型大学(USR)课程中开发健康促进素养量表对于弥补目前在衡量USR对学生公民意识和社会参与度影响方面存在的差距至关重要。本研究旨在通过台湾地区的验证性因素分析(CFA),开发并评估基于健康促进素养的美国研究型大学量表(HPLS-USR)对医科大学生的心理测量特性。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面研究,在台湾中部便利抽样招募了405名学生。Hung等人于2022年开发的HPLS-USR量表包含四个因素——个人成长、公民责任、社会互动和智力发展,这四个因素共同解释了总方差的61.83%。使用SPSS 26版和AMOS(22.0版)进行数据分析,以执行CFA来验证模型的拟合优度。

结果

修改后的模型有3个因素共17个项目,解释了总方差的51.02%。结构方程模型显示拟合良好,表明个人成长、公民责任和社会互动是基于健康促进素养的美国研究型大学课程量表的潜在变量。总量表及三个子量表的克朗巴哈系数在0.82至0.93之间。该量表的心理测量特性在CMIN/DF(χ2/df)=3.149、GFI = 0.91、AGFI = 0.88、SRMR = 0.04、RMSEA = 0.07、NFI = 0.90、NNFI = 0.92、RFI = 0.89、IFI = 0.93、CFI = 0.93、PNFI = 0.78和PCFI = 0.81方面显示出良好至优秀的模型拟合。克朗巴哈系数在0.81至0.89之间;组合系数在0.87至0.94之间。

结论

本研究为HPLS-USR量表提供了初步的结构效度证据,该量表是一种用于评估美国研究型大学学生健康促进素养的强大且心理测量健全的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2b/11931782/787667daca43/12909_2025_6992_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2b/11931782/ecc57e7e7ed2/12909_2025_6992_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2b/11931782/787667daca43/12909_2025_6992_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2b/11931782/ecc57e7e7ed2/12909_2025_6992_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2b/11931782/787667daca43/12909_2025_6992_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the construct validity of the health promotion literacy scale: a confirmatory factor analysis in Taiwan's university social responsibility context.评估健康促进素养量表的结构效度:台湾大学社会责任背景下的验证性因素分析
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06992-4.
2
The Literacy-Based Scale for Measuring Reflections on a University Social Responsibility Curriculum: Development and Validation.基于素养的大学社会责任课程反思量表的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;19(8):4545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084545.
3
Development and reliability and validity testing of a medication literacy scale for medical college students.医学生药物素养量表的编制及信度、效度检验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1238. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06222-3.
4
A new health literacy scale for staff in preschool childcare institution: development and preliminary validation.一种针对学前儿童保育机构工作人员的新健康素养量表:编制与初步验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21233-x.
5
Development and psychometric testing of a scale measuring caring behaviors for healthcare students and providers.测量医护学生和医护人员关爱行为的量表的编制及心理计量学测试。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2066496. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2066496.
6
Development and validation of a short and easy-to-use instrument for measuring health literacy: the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA).开发和验证一种简短易用的成人健康素养测量工具:成人健康素养量表(HELIA)。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 12;20(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08787-2.
7
[Development of a Questionnaire Measuring Sexual Mental Health of Tibetan University Students].[藏族大学生性心理健康测量问卷的编制]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 May;47(3):382-8.
8
Psychometric properties of the health literacy questionnaire tested in Vietnamese adults with chronic diseases.在患有慢性病的越南成年人中测试的健康素养问卷的心理测量特性。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21156-7.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Environmental Health Literacy Scale.《环境卫生素养量表》土耳其语版本的效度与信度
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14289. doi: 10.1111/jep.14289.
10
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spiritual health scale.精神健康量表中文版的信度和效度。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Mar;11(3):1058-1067. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-188.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical students' reflective capacity and its role in their critical thinking disposition.医学生的反思能力及其在批判性思维倾向中的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04163-x.
2
Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education.理解教育中反思性实践的复杂性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 19;13:1008234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234. eCollection 2022.
3
How Accurate Is Your Correlation? Different Methods Derive Different Results and Different Interpretations.你的相关性有多准确?不同方法得出不同结果和不同解释。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 24;13:901412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901412. eCollection 2022.
4
The Literacy-Based Scale for Measuring Reflections on a University Social Responsibility Curriculum: Development and Validation.基于素养的大学社会责任课程反思量表的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;19(8):4545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084545.
5
Universities and their educational mission in the 21st century: Medical education innovations at Comenius University Faculty of Medicine.21世纪的大学及其教育使命:夸美纽斯大学医学院的医学教育创新
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120(9):617-620. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2019_101.
6
Social accountability: a survey of perceptions and evidence of its expression at a Sub Saharan African university.社会责任:对撒哈拉以南非洲一所大学对其表达的看法和证据的调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Oct 18;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-96.