• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量医护学生和医护人员关爱行为的量表的编制及心理计量学测试。

Development and psychometric testing of a scale measuring caring behaviors for healthcare students and providers.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Medical Management, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2066496. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2066496.

DOI:10.1080/10872981.2022.2066496
PMID:35435142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9037200/
Abstract

This study intended to develop and assess the psychometric properties of a caring behavior scale on healthcare students and providers (CBS-HSP) in a Taiwanese population. After a literature review was conducted and an expert panel was consulted for item generation, 104 items for the CBS-HSP scale were derived on a nine-point Likert scale, with 9 indicating 'extremely important' and 1 indicating 'extremely unimportant.' A pilot study was then conducted with seven hundred forty-eight healthcare students and providers in Taiwan for further data analysis. The statistic software used in the study was SPSS for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and AMOS for the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Also, to examine the psychometric properties of the scale, internal consistency, convergent validities, discriminant validities, and model fit indices were calculated in the study. The EFA results derived 31 items in four factors, with 65.742% of the total variance explained: 'support and attentiveness' (11 items; 48.714% of the variance explained), 'professional knowledge and skills' (8 items; 8.226% of the variance explained), 'gratifying needs and responsiveness' (7 items; 5.236% of the variance explained), and 'confidentiality and trust' (5 items; 3.566% of the variance explained). The Cronbach's alphas for the four subscales and the overall scale ranged from 0.894 to 0.964. The CFA results yielded the same 31 items, with the same four factors. The CFA results demonstrated good to excellent model fit in the χ2/df ratio (1.242), GFI (0.988), CFI (0.988), TFI (0.985), and RMSEA (0.031). The Cronbach's alphas ranged between 0.866 and 0.971; the composite alphas ranged between 0.854 and 0.964. The convergent and discriminant validities also proved the stability of the CBS-HSP scale. The research results indicated that the developed CBS-HSP appeared to be a reliable instrument to measure healthcare students' and providers' caring behaviors.

摘要

本研究旨在开发并评估针对台湾地区医护学生和医护人员的关怀行为量表(CBS-HSP)的心理计量学特性。通过文献回顾和专家小组咨询进行项目生成后,CBS-HSP 量表共有 104 个项目,采用 9 点 Likert 量表,其中 9 表示“极其重要”,1 表示“极其不重要”。然后在台湾对 748 名医护学生和医护人员进行了试点研究,以进一步进行数据分析。研究中使用的统计软件是 SPSS 进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和 AMOS 进行验证性因素分析(CFA)。此外,为了检验量表的心理计量学特性,还计算了量表的内部一致性、收敛有效性、区别有效性和模型拟合指数。EFA 结果得出 4 个因素中的 31 个项目,总方差解释率为 65.742%:“支持和关注”(11 个项目;解释方差的 48.714%)、“专业知识和技能”(8 个项目;解释方差的 8.226%)、“满足需求和响应能力”(7 个项目;解释方差的 5.236%)和“保密性和信任”(5 个项目;解释方差的 3.566%)。四个分量表和总量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值范围在 0.894 到 0.964 之间。CFA 结果得出相同的 31 个项目,具有相同的四个因素。CFA 结果表明,χ2/df 比值(1.242)、GFI(0.988)、CFI(0.988)、TFI(0.985)和 RMSEA(0.031)的模型拟合良好至优秀。Cronbach's alpha 值范围在 0.866 到 0.971 之间;综合 alpha 值范围在 0.854 到 0.964 之间。收敛有效性和区别有效性也证明了 CBS-HSP 量表的稳定性。研究结果表明,开发的 CBS-HSP 似乎是一种可靠的工具,可以衡量医护学生和医护人员的关怀行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc4/9037200/1f37bbb1335c/ZMEO_A_2066496_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc4/9037200/8f009fc00b7a/ZMEO_A_2066496_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc4/9037200/1f37bbb1335c/ZMEO_A_2066496_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc4/9037200/8f009fc00b7a/ZMEO_A_2066496_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dc4/9037200/1f37bbb1335c/ZMEO_A_2066496_F0002_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and psychometric testing of a scale measuring caring behaviors for healthcare students and providers.测量医护学生和医护人员关爱行为的量表的编制及心理计量学测试。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2066496. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2066496.
2
Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Humanistic Professional Awareness for Healthcare Students and Providers.医学生和医疗服务提供者人文专业意识测量量表的编制与验证
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Nov 19;14:3213-3223. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S334471. eCollection 2021.
3
Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of a School-to-Work Transition Anxiety Scale for Healthcare Students.开发和验证中文版医学生从学校到工作过渡焦虑量表。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 19;18(14):7658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147658.
4
Development of a Scale Measuring Emotional Catharsis through Illness Narratives.通过疾病叙事测量情绪宣泄的量表的开发。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 4;18(16):8267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168267.
5
Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of a Professional Identity Scale for Healthcare Students and Professionals.医学生和医疗专业人员职业认同量表中文版的编制与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 1;8(4):451. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040451.
6
A Scale Development for Visual Literacy on Health Students and Professionals.一项针对健康专业学生和专业人员视觉素养的量表开发。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Oct 25;16:3129-3141. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S416196. eCollection 2023.
7
Development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student Tuberculosis (TB) Patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China.中国学生结核病患者(STBP)知识、态度和实践(KAP)问卷的编制及心理测量学检验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 8;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3122-9.
8
Validating the ChatGPT Usage Scale: psychometric properties and factor structures among postgraduate students.验证 ChatGPT 使用量表:研究生群体的心理测量学特性和因子结构。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 24;12(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01983-4.
9
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.一种用于测量医学生对评估环境认知的工具的开发:初步验证
Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015.
10
Psychometric properties of a modified health belief model for cervical cancer and visual inspection with acetic acid among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚医护人员中改良的宫颈癌健康信念模型及醋酸视觉检查的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0295905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295905. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural dimensions of physical function and their associations with working memory in adults aged 60-74 years.60至74岁成年人身体功能的结构维度及其与工作记忆的关联
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84351-x.
2
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identify three structural dimensions for measuring physical function in community-dwelling older adults.探索性和验证性因子分析确定了三个结构维度,用于测量社区居住的老年人的身体功能。
PeerJ. 2023 Apr 21;11:e15182. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15182. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Tool to Measure Patient Assessment of Clinical Compassion.开发并验证一种衡量患者临床共情感知的工具。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3976.
2
Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the role-modeling cost-conscious behaviors scale.翻译、跨文化调适和验证榜样成本意识行为量表。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 16;19(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1587-x.
3
Validity and reliability of functional assessment of chronic illness treatment-fatigue scale in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes.
慢性病治疗疲劳量表在土耳其2型糖尿病患者中的效度与信度
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2018 Aug-Sep;65(7):409-417. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
4
Learning lessons from the analysis of patient complaints relating to staff attitudes, behaviour and communication, using the concept of emotional labour.从分析与员工态度、行为和沟通相关的患者投诉中吸取教训,运用情感劳动的概念。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):e1004-e1012. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14121.
5
Compassionomics: Hypothesis and experimental approach.慈悲经济学:假说与实验方法。
Med Hypotheses. 2017 Sep;107:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
6
Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature.同情心:对医疗保健文献的范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 19;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0080-0.
7
Can compassionate healthcare be measured? The Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale™.富有同情心的医疗服务能否被衡量?施瓦茨中心同情心护理量表™
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Aug;98(8):1005-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
8
Empathy and compassion.同理心与同情心。
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):R875-R878. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054.
9
It is time to include compassion in medical training.是时候将同情心纳入医学培训了。
Acad Med. 2013 Jan;88(1):11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182754024.
10
An agenda for improving compassionate care: a survey shows about half of patients say such care is missing.改善同情关怀的议程:一项调查显示,约有一半的患者表示缺乏这种关怀。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1772-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0539.