Suppr超能文献

颅内巨细胞动脉炎:一项全面的系统评价。

Intracranial GCA: a comprehensive systematic review.

作者信息

Patel Sagar, Okaj Iva, Scott Jessica, Atwal Sukhreet, Stark Colin, Tahir Rabia, Khalidi Nader, Junek Mats

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Aug 1;64(8):4517-4524. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf162.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

GCA is increasingly recognized to occur in intracranial vessels with unknown clinical ramifications. We identified all reported cases of intracranial GCA (ICGCA) in the literature to describe common presentations, investigations, treatments and outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase and PubMed databases to identify studies that reported cases of ICGCA. The study was registered on a systematic review database (PROSPERO 42023412373). We defined intracranial involvement as any vessel cranial to the dura mater that was confirmed by either histopathology or imaging. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 1554 studies identified, 102 studies underwent full-text review. These studies included 340 patients with ICGCA. The median age was 73.7 (interquartile range [IQR] 71.9-77.3) and 46.9% patients were female. Presentations of ICGCA included stroke in 240 (70.6%) patients and isolated intracranial imaging or histologic changes in 67 (19.7%) patients. The most common vessels involved were 180 (52.9%) vertebrobasilar, 166 (48.8%) internal carotid and 49 (14.4%) ophthalmic arteries. Treatment was reported in 214 individuals. Glucocorticoids were administered to 210 (98.1%); tocilizumab, cyclophosphamide and methotrexate were the most common adjunctive medications. Of the 181 patients with reported follow-up outcomes, relapse occurred in 40 (22.1%) patients and 59 (32.6%) individuals died.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that ICGCA is not a rare entity and may represent a more severe manifestation of GCA. Optimal therapy for ICGCA is unknown. Structured prospective evaluation is needed to better understand this manifestation of GCA.

摘要

目的

越来越多的人认识到巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)可发生于颅内血管,但其临床影响尚不清楚。我们检索了文献中所有报道的颅内GCA(ICGCA)病例,以描述其常见表现、检查、治疗及预后。

方法

我们使用MEDLINE(医学文献分析与检索系统在线)、Embase和PubMed数据库进行系统综述,以识别报告ICGCA病例的研究。该研究已在一个系统综述数据库(PROSPERO 42023412373)上注册。我们将颅内受累定义为经组织病理学或影像学证实的硬脑膜以上的任何血管。数据采用描述性统计进行汇总。

结果

在1554项检索到的研究中,102项研究进行了全文审查。这些研究包括340例ICGCA患者。中位年龄为73.7岁(四分位间距[IQR]71.9 - 77.3),46.9%的患者为女性。ICGCA的表现包括240例(70.6%)患者发生中风,67例(19.7%)患者出现孤立的颅内影像学或组织学改变。最常受累的血管为180例(52.9%)椎基底动脉、166例(48.8%)颈内动脉和49例(14.4%)眼动脉。214例患者报告了治疗情况。210例(98.1%)患者使用了糖皮质激素;托珠单抗、环磷酰胺和甲氨蝶呤是最常用的辅助药物。在181例报告了随访结果的患者中,40例(22.1%)患者复发,59例(32.6%)患者死亡。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,ICGCA并非罕见疾病,可能代表GCA的一种更严重表现形式。ICGCA的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。需要进行结构化的前瞻性评估,以更好地了解GCA的这种表现形式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9c5/12316374/2d5cc0805c68/keaf162f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验