Rocha Camille Arraes, Marques Elissandra Viana, Ramos Fernanda Caroline Leal, de Souza Oscarina Viana, Carvalho Fátima Cristiane Teles, do Nascimento Ronaldo Ferreira, Zanella Maria Elisa, Cavalcante Rivelino Martins
Instituto de Ciências do Mar (Labomar), Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2025 Jul 1;21(4):910-925. doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjaf041.
Urbanization leads to significant environmental impacts, including the reduction of green spaces, noise pollution, atmospheric pollution, and thermal discomfort. This study aims to evaluate the environmental quality of urban areas used for leisure and sport in Fortaleza, Brazil, a city undergoing rapid urbanization. This research addresses the critical need for understanding urban environmental conditions and their implications for public health and urban planning. Sampling was carried out across two distinct climatic seasons (wet and dry) in 2018, spanning seven weeks in each season (April-June and October-November). The assessment employed multi-indicators, including biological (fungi and bacteria), chemical (particulate matter [PM] and carbonyl compounds), and physical parameters (noise and thermal comfort). Air quality indicators showed the following ranges: PM10 levels varied between 1.12 and 55.85 μg.m-³, PM2.5 levels ranged from 0.69 to 34.43 μg.m-³, and carbonyl compounds were observed at concentrations between 0.85 and 816.37 μg.m-³. Biological indicators included fungi counts ranging from 61.0 to 735 CFUs.m-³ (colony-forming units per cubic meter) and bacterial counts between 142.0 and 2,381.5 CFUs.m-³. Physical indicators measured noise levels at 59.87 to 66.81 dBA and thermal comfort values between 25.31 and 27.18 Discomfort Index (DI). Higher concentrations of atmospheric pollution were observed during the wet season, while thermal comfort was better during the dry season. Noise levels remained relatively constant across seasons. Notably, formaldehyde concentrations at most sampling points posed a high cancer risk, exceeding limits set by regulatory agencies. Three points also presented significant health risks due to PM exposure. The evaluation method combined direct measurements with multivariate statistical techniques to calculate an Environmental Quality Index (EQI), classifying sites as "excellent," "good," or "poor." The findings highlight the influence of factors such as vehicular traffic, vegetation coverage, and building density on environmental quality. These findings highlight the importance of urban design and vegetation in improving environmental quality and supporting public well-being.
城市化导致重大的环境影响,包括绿地减少、噪音污染、大气污染和热不适。本研究旨在评估巴西福塔莱萨市快速城市化进程中用于休闲和体育的城市区域的环境质量。本研究满足了理解城市环境状况及其对公众健康和城市规划影响的迫切需求。采样于2018年的两个不同气候季节(雨季和旱季)进行,每个季节为期七周(4月至6月和10月至11月)。评估采用了多指标,包括生物指标(真菌和细菌)、化学指标(颗粒物[PM]和羰基化合物)以及物理参数(噪音和热舒适度)。空气质量指标显示出以下范围:PM10水平在1.12至55.85μg.m⁻³之间变化,PM2.5水平在0.69至34.43μg.m⁻³之间,羰基化合物的浓度在0.85至816.37μg.m⁻³之间。生物指标包括真菌计数在61.0至735 CFUs.m⁻³(每立方米菌落形成单位)之间,细菌计数在142.0至2381.5 CFUs.m⁻³之间。物理指标测量的噪音水平在59.87至66.81 dBA之间,热舒适度值在25.31至27.18不适指数(DI)之间。在雨季观察到更高浓度的大气污染,而在旱季热舒适度更好。噪音水平在各季节保持相对稳定。值得注意的是,大多数采样点的甲醛浓度构成了高癌症风险,超过了监管机构设定的限值。三个点也因接触PM而呈现出重大健康风险。评估方法将直接测量与多元统计技术相结合,以计算环境质量指数(EQI),将场地分类为“优秀”、“良好”或“较差”。研究结果突出了车辆交通、植被覆盖和建筑密度等因素对环境质量的影响。这些发现凸显了城市设计和植被在改善环境质量和支持公众福祉方面的重要性。