• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克风险评分的开发与验证

Development and Validation of a Risk Score in Acute Myocardial Infarction related Cardiogenic Shock.

作者信息

Peters Elma J, Kunkel Joakim B, Bogerd Margriet, Ten Berg Sanne, Timmermans Marijke J C, Helgestad Ole K L, Ravn Hanne B, Kraaijeveld Adriaan O, Otterspoor Luuk C, Sjauw Krischan D, Lipšic Erik, Engström Annemarie E, Vlaar Alexander P J, Hassager Christian, Møller Jacob E, Henriques José P S

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf043.

DOI:10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf043
PMID:40132104
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMICS) is high, but a widely accepted tool for individual risk assessment is lacking. A reliable prediction model could assist in clinical decision making, patient selection for clinical trials, and comparison of AMICS populations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and externally validate a prediction model for 30-day mortality in AMICS patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients from 2017 to 2021(development cohort) and 2010-2017 (validation cohort). Patients with AMICS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Netherlands were identified using the Netherlands Heart Registration. International validation was performed in the Danish Retroshock registry. The main outcome was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 2261 patients, the median age was 67 years(IQR 58-75), and 1649(73%) were male. The mortality rate at 30 days was 39%(n=886). Significant predictors for mortality were: initial lactate, glucose, renal function, hemoglobin, age, blood pressure, heart rate, intubation prior to PCI, intervention in the left main coronary artery, and successful revascularization. The AUC of the initial model was 0.81(0.79-0.83). The external validation cohort included 1393 patients with 1050 (75%) male and a median age of 67 years(IQR 59-75). The 30-day mortality rate was 49%(n=680). The model showed good performance om the external validation with an AUC of 0.73(0.70-0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

A prediction model was developed and externally validated using data from two large national registries. The model demonstrated good performance and is suitable for clinical decision-making and quality purposes in AMICS.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克(AMICS)患者的死亡率很高,但缺乏一种被广泛接受的个体风险评估工具。可靠的预测模型有助于临床决策、临床试验的患者选择以及AMICS人群的比较。因此,本研究的目的是开发并外部验证AMICS患者30天死亡率的预测模型。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2017年至2021年(开发队列)和2010年至2017年(验证队列)的患者。使用荷兰心脏登记系统识别在荷兰接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的AMICS患者。在丹麦Retroshock登记系统中进行国际验证。主要结局是30天死亡率。

结果

在2261例患者中,中位年龄为67岁(四分位间距58 - 75岁),1649例(73%)为男性。30天死亡率为39%(n = 886)。死亡率的显著预测因素为:初始乳酸、血糖、肾功能、血红蛋白、年龄、血压、心率、PCI术前插管、左主干冠状动脉介入治疗以及成功的血运重建。初始模型的AUC为0.81(0.79 - 0.83)。外部验证队列包括1393例患者,其中1050例(75%)为男性,中位年龄为67岁(四分位间距59 - 75岁)。30天死亡率为49%(n = 680)。该模型在外部验证中表现良好,AUC为0.73(0.70 - 0.76)。

结论

使用来自两个大型国家登记系统的数据开发并外部验证了一个预测模型。该模型表现良好,适用于AMICS的临床决策和质量评估。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Risk Score in Acute Myocardial Infarction related Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克风险评分的开发与验证
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf043.
2
Protocolised Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock in Australia-Initial Experience From a Hub-and-Spoke Model.澳大利亚急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的规范化管理——中心辐射模式的初步经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 May;105(6):1338-1348. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31462. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Model for end-stage liver disease incorporating albumin score is associated with short- and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.纳入白蛋白评分的终末期肝病模型与急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的短期和长期全因死亡率相关。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Jul 3;14(6):342-350. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf063.
4
Machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality and external validation in patients with cardiogenic shock: the RESCUE score.心源性休克患者院内死亡率的机器学习预测及外部验证:RESCUE评分
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis on primary percutaneous coronary intervention of an unprotected left main coronary artery culprit lesion in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死时非保护左主干冠状动脉罪犯病变的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.020.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Development of an Acute Coronary Syndrome-Cardiogenic Shock Risk Score for 30-day Mortality From the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR ACS-CS Risk Score).基于维多利亚心脏结局登记处(VCOR ACS-CS风险评分)制定的急性冠状动脉综合征-心源性休克30天死亡率风险评分
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31540.
8
Predicting Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.预测急性心肌梗死住院患者的死亡率:来自国家心血管数据注册库
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Mar;18(3):e011259. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011259. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
9
Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.主动脉内球囊反搏术(IABP)用于治疗心肌梗死合并心源性休克。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 27;2015(3):CD007398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007398.pub3.
10
Long-term outcomes after acute kidney injury in myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a retrospective, observational study.心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者急性肾损伤后的长期预后:一项回顾性观察研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Aug 6;14(7):385-391. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf048.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Predictive Models of Cardiogenic Shock in STEMI: Focus on Interventional and Critical Care Phases.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中心源性休克的动态预测模型:聚焦于介入治疗和重症监护阶段
J Clin Med. 2025 May 16;14(10):3503. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103503.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling non-linear relationships in epidemiological data: The application and interpretation of spline models.模拟流行病学数据中的非线性关系:样条模型的应用与解读
Front Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 18;2:975380. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2022.975380. eCollection 2022.
2
Prognostic performance of the IABP-SHOCK II Risk Score among cardiogenic shock subtypes in the critical care cardiology trials network registry.在重症监护心脏病试验网络登记处的心源性休克亚型中,IABP-SHOCK II风险评分的预后性能。
Am Heart J. 2024 Apr;270:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.12.018. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
3
Characteristics, Treatment Strategies and Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Contemporary Dutch Cohort.
急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的特征、治疗策略及预后:一项当代荷兰队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 10;12(16):5221. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165221.
4
Predictive Model and Risk Score for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with All-Cause Cardiogenic Shock.全因性心源性休克患者院内死亡的预测模型及风险评分
Int Heart J. 2022 Nov 30;63(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1536/ihj.22-303. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
Impact of diabetes on outcomes of cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病对心原性休克结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2022 Sep-Oct;19(5):14791641221132242. doi: 10.1177/14791641221132242.
6
A Comprehensive Appraisal of Risk Prediction Models for Cardiogenic Shock.心力性休克风险预测模型的全面评估
Shock. 2022 May 1;57(5):617-629. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001921.
7
Using real-world data to monitor and improve quality of care in coronary artery disease: results from the Netherlands Heart Registration.利用真实世界数据监测和改善冠心病护理质量:荷兰心脏注册研究结果
Neth Heart J. 2022 Dec;30(12):546-556. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01672-0. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
8
Challenges in the conduct of randomised controlled trials in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的随机对照试验实施中的挑战。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Feb 28;19(2):125-129. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.02.002.
9
Early risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock irrespective of the underlying cause - the Cardiogenic Shock Score.无论病因如何,对心源性休克患者进行早期风险分层——心源性休克评分。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Apr;24(4):657-667. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2449. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
10
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月获得美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 8;79(9):933-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.