• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的特征、治疗策略及预后:一项当代荷兰队列研究

Characteristics, Treatment Strategies and Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Contemporary Dutch Cohort.

作者信息

Peters Elma J, Berg Sanne Ten, Bogerd Margriet, Timmermans Marijke J C, Kraaijeveld Adriaan O, Bunge Jeroen J H, Teeuwen Koen, Lipsic Erik, Sjauw Krischan D, Geuns Robert-Jan M van, Dedic Admir, Dubois Eric A, Meuwissen Martijn, Danse Peter, Verouden Niels J W, Bleeker Gabe, Cabezas José M Montero, Ferreira Irlando A, Engström Annemarie E, Lagrand Wim K, Otterspoor Luuk C, Vlaar Alexander P J, Henriques José P S

机构信息

Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Netherlands Heart Registration, 3511 EP Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 10;12(16):5221. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165221.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12165221
PMID:37629263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10455258/
Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Our study aimed to gain insights into patient characteristics, outcomes and treatment strategies in CS patients. Patients with CS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2017 and 2021 were identified in a nationwide registry. Data on medical history, laboratory values, angiographic features and outcomes were retrospectively assessed. A total of 2328 patients with a mean age of 66 years and of whom 73% were male, were included. Mortality at 30 days was 39% for the entire cohort. Non-survivors presented with a lower mean blood pressure and increased heart rate, blood lactate and blood glucose levels (-value for all <0.001). Also, an increased prevalence of diabetes, multivessel coronary artery disease and a prior coronary event were found. Of all patients, 24% received mechanical circulatory support, of which the majority was via intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs). Furthermore, 79% of patients were treated with at least one vasoactive agent, and multivessel PCI was performed in 28%. In conclusion, a large set of hemodynamic, biochemical and patient-related characteristics was identified to be associated with mortality. Interestingly, multivessel PCI and IABPs were frequently applied despite a lack of evidence.

摘要

心源性休克(CS)并发急性心肌梗死(AMI)与高发病率和死亡率相关。我们的研究旨在深入了解CS患者的特征、预后和治疗策略。在一项全国性登记研究中,纳入了2017年至2021年间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的CS患者。回顾性评估患者的病史、实验室检查值、血管造影特征和预后。共纳入2328例患者,平均年龄66岁,其中73%为男性。整个队列30天死亡率为39%。非幸存者的平均血压较低,心率、血乳酸和血糖水平升高(所有P值均<0.001)。此外,还发现糖尿病、多支冠状动脉疾病和既往冠状动脉事件的患病率增加。所有患者中,24%接受了机械循环支持,其中大多数通过主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)进行。此外,79%的患者接受了至少一种血管活性药物治疗,28%的患者接受了多支血管PCI治疗。总之,大量血流动力学、生化和患者相关特征被确定与死亡率相关。有趣的是,尽管缺乏证据,多支血管PCI和IABP仍经常应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/63980ee5f9f1/jcm-12-05221-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/ad2fc1f18ab5/jcm-12-05221-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/2e529a12e32d/jcm-12-05221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/31839e10d377/jcm-12-05221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/529ff124ec74/jcm-12-05221-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/63980ee5f9f1/jcm-12-05221-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/ad2fc1f18ab5/jcm-12-05221-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/2e529a12e32d/jcm-12-05221-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/31839e10d377/jcm-12-05221-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/529ff124ec74/jcm-12-05221-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d24/10455258/63980ee5f9f1/jcm-12-05221-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics, Treatment Strategies and Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Contemporary Dutch Cohort.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的特征、治疗策略及预后:一项当代荷兰队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 10;12(16):5221. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165221.
2
Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.急性心肌梗合并需要静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合的晚期心源性休克患者中,罪犯血管血运重建与即刻多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e029792. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029792. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
4
Revascularization Practices and Outcomes in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Who Presented With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock in the US, 2009-2018.2009-2018 年美国急性心肌梗死伴心原性休克多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建实践和结局。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1317-1327. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3276.
5
Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.多支血管病变与罪犯病变血运重建治疗并发急性心肌梗死后心原性休克:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Feb;7(1):28-37. doi: 10.1177/2048872617719640. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
Editor's Choice- Impact of immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention on 1-year outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Results of the randomised IABP-SHOCK II trial.编辑精选-急性心肌梗死并发心原性休克患者行即刻多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与罪犯病变介入治疗对 1 年预后的影响:随机 IABP-SHOCK II 试验结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Oct;6(7):601-609. doi: 10.1177/2048872616668977. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
7
Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持装置的情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748.
8
Current clinical management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克的临床处理现状。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Jan;19(1):41-46. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1854733. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
Sex-Specific Management in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的性别特异性管理:CULPRIT-SHOCK 试验的亚研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar;13(3):e008537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008537. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
Outcome predictors of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心源性休克的预后预测因素
Tunis Med. 2019 Mar;97(3):476-483.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Risk Score in Acute Myocardial Infarction related Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克风险评分的开发与验证
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf043.
2
Variations in the Medical Device Authorization and Reimbursement Landscape: A Case Study of 2 Cardiovascular Devices Across 4 Countries.医疗器械授权与报销情况的差异:以4个国家的2种心血管器械为例的案例研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Apr;18(4):e011636. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011636. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Clinical use and impact of mechanical circulatory support for myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock in the Netherlands: a registry-based propensity-matched analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Mechanical Circulatory Device Utilization and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock.社会经济地位对心源性休克中机械循环装置使用及结局的影响
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 11;1(2):100027. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100027. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
2
Differences in Outcome of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Associated with In-Hospital or Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.与院内或院外心脏骤停相关的心源性休克患者的结局差异。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 6;12(5):2064. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052064.
3
Data quality and auditing within the Netherlands Heart Registration: using the PCI registry as an example.
荷兰机械循环支持用于心肌梗死相关心源性休克的临床应用及影响:一项基于注册登记的倾向评分匹配分析
Open Heart. 2025 Feb 17;12(1):e002846. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002846.
4
Resource utilization associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation vs. microaxial flow pump for infarct-related cardiogenic shock.体外膜肺氧合与微轴流泵用于梗死相关心源性休克的资源利用情况
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 May 16;14(5):279-287. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf024.
5
Management of cardiogenic shock: state-of-the-art.心原性休克的治疗:最新进展。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1814-1829. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07618-x. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
6
Impact of symptom duration and mechanical circulatory support on prognosis in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.症状持续时间和机械循环支持对急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克预后的影响。
Neth Heart J. 2024 Aug;32(7-8):290-297. doi: 10.1007/s12471-024-01881-9. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
7
Characteristics and outcome in cardiogenic shock according to vascular access site for percutaneous coronary intervention.根据经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的血管入路,心原性休克的特征和结局。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 Aug 28;13(8):615-623. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae078.
8
Biomarker patterns in patients with cardiogenic shock versus septic shock.心源性休克与感染性休克患者的生物标志物模式。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 May 14;52:101424. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101424. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Building a patient-centred nationwide integrated cardiac care registry: intermediate results from the Netherlands.建立以患者为中心的全国性综合心脏护理登记系统:荷兰的中期结果。
Neth Heart J. 2024 Jun;32(6):228-237. doi: 10.1007/s12471-024-01877-5. Epub 2024 May 22.
10
Outcomes of ECLS-SHOCK Eligibility Criteria Applied to a Real-World Cohort.应用于真实世界队列的体外膜肺氧合-休克(ECLS-SHOCK)入选标准的结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 8;12(22):6988. doi: 10.3390/jcm12226988.
荷兰心脏注册中的数据质量与审核:以PCI注册为例
Neth Heart J. 2023 Sep;31(9):334-339. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01752-1. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Predictive Model and Risk Score for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with All-Cause Cardiogenic Shock.全因性心源性休克患者院内死亡的预测模型及风险评分
Int Heart J. 2022 Nov 30;63(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1536/ihj.22-303. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
Clinical characteristics and evolution of patients with cardiogenic shock in Argentina in the context of an acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation. Data from the nationwide ARGEN-IAM-ST Registry.阿根廷ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者心源性休克的临床特征及演变。来自全国性ARGEN-IAM-ST注册研究的数据。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Feb;48(2):101468. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101468. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
6
PRospective REgistry of PAtients in REfractory cardiogenic shock-The PREPARE CardShock registry.前瞻性难治性心原性休克患者登记研究——PREPARE 心原性休克登记研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep;100(3):319-327. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30327. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
Non-STEMI vs. STEMI Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Profile and Long-Term Outcomes.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死与ST段抬高型心肌梗死所致心源性休克:临床特征与长期预后
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3558. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123558.
8
Using real-world data to monitor and improve quality of care in coronary artery disease: results from the Netherlands Heart Registration.利用真实世界数据监测和改善冠心病护理质量:荷兰心脏注册研究结果
Neth Heart J. 2022 Dec;30(12):546-556. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01672-0. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Cardiogenic shock: incidence, survival and mechanical circulatory support usage 2007-2017-insights from a national registry.心原性休克:2007-2017 年全国注册登记研究中心的发病率、生存率和机械循环支持应用情况。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Sep;110(9):1421-1430. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01781-z. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
10
Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study.2010 年至 2017 年急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的发病率和患者特征的时间趋势:丹麦队列研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;21(11):1370-1378. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1566. Epub 2019 Jul 24.