Patel Rashmi, Liman Christian, Oyesanya Mayowa, Ker Sheryl, Jayaraman Aishwarya, Franzenburg Kelli R, Hansen Rolf T, Philbin Mike J, Thompson Stephen
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Holmusk Technologies Inc, New York, New York, USA.
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 24;15(3):e092216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092216.
To investigate long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic prescribing patterns and their associations with transition and continuation of care and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) for patients with schizophrenia in the USA.
A retrospective cohort study.
Electronic health record data from adults in the USA with schizophrenia were extracted from the NeuroBlu Database V.21R2.
Adults (aged ≥18 years) with a schizophrenia diagnosis who initiated LAI antipsychotic treatment during psychiatric inpatient admission. The index date was the date of LAI initiation. Patients who had ≥1 primary, secondary or tertiary ICD-9/10 (International Classification of Diseases) diagnosis of schizophrenia at clinical sites that had both inpatient and outpatient facilities were included.
Transition-of-care (eg, risk of rehospitalisation, number of hospital readmissions, number of outpatient visits post discharge), continuation-of-care (eg, first treatment path after discharge, time to index LAI discontinuation and number of patients who restarted LAIs after discontinuation) and HCRU endpoints (eg, length of stay of index hospitalisation and estimated cost for psychiatric outpatient visits pre-index and post-index) were the primary outcome measures.
A total of 1197 patients were included who initiated an LAI in an inpatient setting. Of 339 patients with ≥3 months pre-index and post-index data, median time to rehospitalisation was 135 days. Patients discharged taking an LAI alone had lower frequency of rehospitalisation (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.62 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.84)), lower risk of longer hospital stays (IRR=0.60 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84)), lower risk of becoming rehospitalised (HR=0.49 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.69)) and lower risk of outpatient visits (IRR=0.50 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70)) versus patients co-prescribed an oral antipsychotic (LAI+OA). Patients discharged taking an LAI dosed once every 1-2 months or once every 2 weeks had lower frequency of rehospitalisation (IRR=0.85 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.14)), lower risk of longer hospital stays (IRR=0.90 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.15)) and lower risk of becoming rehospitalised versus an LAI dosed once every 2 weeks; risk of becoming rehospitalised was no different (HR=1.00 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.32)) and risk of outpatient visits was greater (IRR=1.25 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.63)). During hospitalisation, 73.4% of patients were co-prescribed an OA, most frequently risperidone, with their index LAI. From pre-admission to post-discharge, psychiatric clinic costs significantly increased (US$14 231, p<0.01 post-discharge vs pre-admission) among patients co-prescribed an OA. For patients who were prescribed an LAI alone there was minimal change in costs from pre-admission to post-discharge (p=0.068). At 12 months post-index, 75.3% of patients discontinued LAIs, dosed once every 1-2 months versus LAIs, dosed once every 2 weeks (86.5%) and median days to discontinuation was longer (67 (IQR 60-91) vs 32 (IQR 28-49).
Patients prescribed a combination of LAI and OA at discharge had a higher risk of rehospitalisation compared with those prescribed LAI alone. Additionally, the study findings suggest that patients are more likely to be prescribed oral risperidone, the most frequently used second-generation OA, which may support an easier transition to an LAI of the same molecule.
调查美国精神分裂症患者长效注射用(LAI)抗精神病药物的处方模式及其与护理过渡和延续以及医疗资源利用(HCRU)的关联。
一项回顾性队列研究。
从NeuroBlu数据库V.21R2中提取美国成年精神分裂症患者的电子健康记录数据。
在精神科住院期间开始接受LAI抗精神病药物治疗的成年患者(年龄≥18岁)。索引日期为LAI开始日期。在设有住院和门诊设施的临床场所,有≥1次原发性、继发性或三级ICD-9/10(国际疾病分类)精神分裂症诊断的患者被纳入。
护理过渡(如再住院风险、医院再入院次数、出院后门诊就诊次数)、护理延续(如出院后的首次治疗路径、索引LAI停药时间以及停药后重新开始使用LAI的患者人数)和HCRU终点指标(如索引住院的住院时间以及索引前和索引后精神科门诊就诊的估计费用)为主要结局指标。
共有1197名在住院环境中开始使用LAI的患者被纳入。在339名索引前和索引后有≥3个月数据的患者中,再住院的中位时间为135天。仅出院时使用LAI的患者与同时开具口服抗精神病药物(LAI+OA)的患者相比,再住院频率较低(发病率比(IRR)=0.62(95%CI,0.46至0.84)),住院时间较长的风险较低(IRR=0.60(95%CI,0.43至0.84)),再次住院的风险较低(HR=0.49(95%CI,0.35至0.69)),门诊就诊风险较低(IRR=0.50(95%CI,0.36至0.70))。出院时每1-2个月或每2周注射一次LAI的患者与每2周注射一次LAI的患者相比,再住院频率较低(IRR=0.85(95%CI,0.64至1.14)),住院时间较长的风险较低(IRR=0.90(95%CI,0.70至1.15)),再次住院的风险较低;再次住院的风险无差异(HR=1.00(95%CI,0.76至1.32)),门诊就诊风险较高(IRR=1.25(95%CI,0.96至1.63))。住院期间,73.4%的患者在索引LAI的同时还开具了OA,最常用奥氮平。在同时开具OA的患者中,从入院前到出院后,精神科门诊费用显著增加(14231美元,出院后与入院前相比p<0.01)。对于仅开具LAI的患者,从入院前到出院后费用变化最小(p=0.068)。索引后12个月,每1-2个月注射一次LAI的患者中有75.3%停药,每2周注射一次LAI的患者中有86.5%停药,停药的中位天数更长(67(IQR 60-91)对32(IQR 28-49))。
出院时开具LAI和OA联合处方的患者与仅开具LAI的患者相比,再住院风险更高。此外,研究结果表明,患者更有可能被开具口服奥氮平,这是最常用的第二代OA,这可能有助于更轻松地过渡到相同分子的LAI。