Suppr超能文献

围手术期医学标准化终点的最新系统评价与共识定义:患者舒适度与疼痛缓解

An updated systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised endpoints in perioperative medicine: patient comfort and pain relief.

作者信息

Myles Paul S, Wallace Sophie, Boney Oliver, Botti Mari, Chung Frances, Cyna Allan M, Gan Tong J, Grocott Michael P W, Jensen Mark P, Kehlet Henrik, Kurz Andrea, Leger Maxime, Nilsson Ulrica, Peyton Phillip, Sessler Daniel I, Tramèr Martin R, Wu Christopher L

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2025 May;134(5):1450-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.02.025. Epub 2025 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improving comfort during and after surgery is a key concern for anaesthetists and other clinicians. With the inclusion of patient and public involvement, we undertook a Delphi consensus process to update previously recommended endpoints to be used in clinical trials evaluating treatments aiming to improve patient comfort after surgery.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review to identify domains and outcome measures of patient comfort used in perioperative studies. Focus groups, workshops, and a multi-round Delphi consensus process that included clinician-researchers and a patient experience and consumer group updated a recommended list of standardised endpoints focused on patient comfort. Consensus was defined as a median item score of 7 or greater and at least 70% of responses achieving a score of 7 or greater on a 9-point Likert scale. Additional ratings were done to determine validity, reliability, feasibility, and patient-centredness. Qualitative analyses were undertaken to identify themes.

RESULTS

Response rates for each of the Delphi rounds were 100%. A final list of eight defined endpoints was identified: supplementary analgesic use, subjective analgesic effectiveness, pain intensity (at rest, during movement, and at 12, 24, and 72 h), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV, at 0-6 h, at 6-24 h, and overall), postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV), severe PONV, quality of recovery (QoR-15), and time to mobilisation. All endpoints were assessed as valid, reliable, and feasible measures of patient comfort and were considered patient-centred. Patient and public involvement highlighted the importance of clear communication and shared decision-making to enhance comfort through the surgical journey.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that at least some of these standardised endpoints be included as outcome measures in clinical trials assessing patient comfort and pain after surgery.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/DJQFE).

摘要

背景

提高手术期间及术后的舒适度是麻醉医生和其他临床医生的关键关注点。在纳入患者和公众参与的情况下,我们开展了德尔菲共识程序,以更新先前推荐的终点指标,用于评估旨在改善术后患者舒适度的治疗方法的临床试验。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定围手术期研究中使用的患者舒适度领域和结局指标。焦点小组、研讨会以及包括临床研究人员、患者体验和消费者群体在内的多轮德尔菲共识程序更新了一份以患者舒适度为重点的标准化终点指标推荐清单。共识定义为在9分制李克特量表上项目得分中位数为7或更高,且至少70%的回答得分为7或更高。进行了额外的评分以确定有效性、可靠性、可行性和以患者为中心的程度。进行了定性分析以确定主题。

结果

德尔菲各轮的回复率均为100%。确定了最终的八项明确终点指标清单:辅助镇痛药的使用、主观镇痛效果、疼痛强度(静息时、活动时以及术后12、24和72小时)、术后恶心呕吐(术后0 - 6小时、6 - 24小时以及总体)、出院后恶心呕吐、严重术后恶心呕吐、恢复质量(QoR - 15)以及活动时间。所有终点指标均被评估为患者舒适度的有效、可靠且可行的指标,并被认为是以患者为中心的。患者和公众的参与突出了清晰沟通和共同决策对于在手术过程中提高舒适度的重要性。

结论

我们建议在评估术后患者舒适度和疼痛的临床试验中,至少应将其中一些标准化终点指标作为结局指标纳入。

系统评价方案

开放科学框架(10.17605/OSF.IO/DJQFE)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验