Suppr超能文献

是否需要第二次经颅多普勒研究来确认神经循环停止?

Is a Second Transcranial Doppler Study Needed to Confirm Neurocirculatory Arrest?

作者信息

Eatz Tiffany, Cabrera Yosdely, Cabrera Frank, Kottapally Mohan, Merenda Amedeo, Alkhachroum Ayham, Romano Jose G, Koch Sebastian

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The University of Miami Health System, 1400 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2025 Oct;43(2):467-471. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02241-0. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In determining brain death, transcranial Doppler (TCD) is one of the recommended ancillary tests when clinical examinations and apnea tests are contraindicated. The American Academy of Neurology 2023 guideline updates and 2020 World Brain Death Project advise conducting two TCDs 30 min apart to diagnose neurocirculatory arrest. Our study aimed to evaluate whether a second TCD is necessary when the first TCD shows neurocirculatory arrest (no flow, oscillating flow, or systolic spikes).

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients admitted to intensive care units from January 1, 2021, to February 1, 2025, at a community-based academic hospital. We included patients whose first study showed neurocirculatory arrest and who subsequently underwent a confirmatory TCD at least 30 min apart. A total of 48 patients were included in our final analysis. We compared the findings of the first TCD study with those of the second study and noted any differences.

RESULTS

In all 48 patients (100%), the second TCD confirmed the findings of the first TCD. Of these 48 patients, 44 patients (91.7%) had the same flow pattern on repeat TCD examination and 4 patients' (8.30%) TCDs showed different flow patterns, although still consistent with neurocirculatory arrest. Of the 44 patients with the same flow patterns found on first and repeat TCD examinations, 18 patients (40.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate brief systolic spikes; three patients (6.80%) had both TCDs demonstrate brief systolic spikes and oscillating flow; eight patients (18.2%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow; seven patients (15.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow and brief systolic spikes; one patient (2.30%) had both TCDs demonstrate no flow, brief systolic spikes, and oscillating flow; and, lastly, seven patients (15.9%) had both TCDs demonstrate oscillating flow.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that requiring two sequential TCD examinations to confirm neurocirculatory arrest may be unnecessary when the first TCD shows neurocirculatory arrest. Further investigation and studies such as ours in larger populations are warranted.

摘要

背景

在判定脑死亡时,当临床检查和呼吸暂停试验存在禁忌证时,经颅多普勒超声(TCD)是推荐的辅助检查之一。美国神经病学学会2023年指南更新版以及2020年世界脑死亡项目建议间隔30分钟进行两次TCD检查以诊断神经循环停止。我们的研究旨在评估当首次TCD显示神经循环停止(无血流、摆动血流或收缩期尖峰)时,第二次TCD是否必要。

方法

我们对2021年1月1日至2025年2月1日期间在一家社区教学医院重症监护病房收治的患者进行了单中心回顾性分析。我们纳入了首次检查显示神经循环停止且随后至少间隔30分钟接受了一次确认性TCD检查的患者。最终分析共纳入48例患者。我们比较了首次TCD检查结果与第二次检查结果,并记录了所有差异。

结果

在所有48例患者(100%)中,第二次TCD检查结果与首次TCD检查结果一致。在这48例患者中,44例患者(91.7%)在重复TCD检查时血流模式相同,4例患者(8.30%)的TCD显示出不同的血流模式,尽管仍与神经循环停止相符。在首次和重复TCD检查中血流模式相同的44例患者中,18例患者(40.9%)的两次TCD检查均显示短暂的收缩期尖峰;3例患者(6.80%)的两次TCD检查均显示短暂的收缩期尖峰和摆动血流;8例患者(18.2%)的两次TCD检查均显示无血流;7例患者(15.9%)的两次TCD检查均显示无血流和短暂的收缩期尖峰;1例患者(2.30%)的两次TCD检查均显示无血流、短暂的收缩期尖峰和摆动血流;最后,7例患者(15.9%)的两次TCD检查均显示摆动血流。

结论

我们发现,当首次TCD显示神经循环停止时,可能无需进行两次连续的TCD检查来确认神经循环停止。有必要在更大规模人群中开展进一步的调查研究,如我们所进行的这类研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验