Suppr超能文献

原位导管癌合并存在是否会影响三阴性浸润性导管癌新辅助治疗后的预后结果?

Does concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ influence the prognostic outcome after neoadjuvant therapy in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma?

作者信息

Zhou Sicheng, Liang Li, Huang Zehao, Teng Yue, Xing Wei

机构信息

Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.

Department of Pathology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 25;23(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03753-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a precursor to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and the coexistence of DCIS with IDC is often observed during the diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of study is to investigated the clinicopathological features and prognosis of triple-negative IDC with DCIS following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Additionally, we explored the risk factors for residual DCIS in these patients post-NAT.

METHODS

This study included patients with stages II-III triple-negative breast cancer with histologically confirmed IDC who underwent radical surgery after NAT between January 2011 and December 2021. Baseline data, clinical features, pathological outcomes, and prognostic information were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 315 patients were enrolled and categorized into the IDC + DCIS (n = 67) and IDC groups (n = 248) according to the composition of the pre-NAT biopsy. The proportion of patients with histological grade G3 (78.2% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.004) and a Ki-67 index > 20% (98.4% vs. 86.6%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the IDC group than in the IDC + DCIS group. Although no significant difference was observed in the 5-year overall survival (OS) (93.4% vs. 90.8%, p = 0.298) between the two groups, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (90.6% vs. 83.5%, p = 0.041) of the IDC + DCIS group was significantly better than that in the IDC group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that IDC + DCIS (HR: 0.502; 95% CI, 0.284-0.952; p = 0.048) was an independent prognostic factor for DFS. In addition, the clinical T3-T4 stage (OR = 3.891; 95% CI, 1.320-15.219, p = 0.040) and clinical N1-N3 (OR = 4.500; 95% CI, 1.495-13.564, p = 0.012) were independent preoperative predictors of residual DCIS after NAT in patients with IDC and DCIS components.

CONCLUSION

The presence of DCIS component in patients with triple-negative IDC is associated with lower tumor aggressiveness and improved DFS after NAT compared to patients without DCIS. Additionally, clinical T and N stages are risk factors for residual DCIS after NAT in patients with triple-negative IDC and a DCIS component.

摘要

目的

导管原位癌(DCIS)被认为是浸润性导管癌(IDC)的前驱病变,在乳腺癌诊断过程中常观察到DCIS与IDC并存。本研究旨在探讨新辅助治疗(NAT)后三阴性IDC合并DCIS的临床病理特征及预后。此外,我们还探讨了这些患者NAT后残留DCIS的危险因素。

方法

本研究纳入了2011年1月至2021年12月期间接受NAT后行根治性手术的II-III期组织学确诊为IDC的三阴性乳腺癌患者。收集并分析基线数据、临床特征、病理结果和预后信息。

结果

共纳入315例患者,根据NAT前活检的组织构成分为IDC+DCIS组(n=67)和IDC组(n=248)。IDC组组织学分级为G3的患者比例(78.2%对61.2%,p=0.004)和Ki-67指数>20%的患者比例(98.4%对86.6%,p<0.001)显著高于IDC+DCIS组。虽然两组间5年总生存率(OS)无显著差异(93.4%对90.8%,p=0.298),但IDC+DCIS组的5年无病生存率(DFS)(90.6%对83.5%,p=0.041)显著优于IDC组。多因素分析表明,IDC+DCIS(HR:0.502;95%CI,0.284-0.952;p=0.048)是DFS的独立预后因素。此外,临床T3-T4期(OR=3.891;95%CI,1.320-15.219,p=0.040)和临床N1-N3期(OR=4.500;95%CI,1.495-13.564,p=0.012)是IDC合并DCIS患者NAT后残留DCIS的独立术前预测因素。

结论

与无DCIS的患者相比,三阴性IDC患者中DCIS成分的存在与较低的肿瘤侵袭性及NAT后改善的DFS相关。此外,临床T和N分期是三阴性IDC合并DCIS成分患者NAT后残留DCIS的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b13/11934604/5dc6651f05aa/12957_2025_3753_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验