Ferrari Yasmim Anayr Costa, Jesus Carla Viviane Freitas de, Batista Jefferson Felipe Calazans, Silva Brenda Evelin Barreto da, Cavalcante Anderson Batista, Lima Carlos Anselmo
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Sergipe. R. Cláudio Batista s/n - Hospital Universitário, Bairro Sanatório. 49060-100 Aracaju SE Brasil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Ambiente, Universidade Tiradentes. Aracaju SE Brasil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2025 Mar;30(3):e09962023. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232025303.09962023. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
The scope of this study was to describe the secular trend of cervical cancer mortality in Brazil and its various regions from 1980 to 2021. It involved a populational and ecological study, based on data available at the Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System, using codes 180 and C53. Crude rates, age-specific rates, and age-standardized rates were calculated for the Brazilian and world population. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) was obtained by trend analysis using the Joinpoint Regression Program, with a significance level of 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). There were 171,793 deaths from cervical cancer. In Brazil (AAPC -0.3; CI95%-1.0; 0.4), North (AAPC 0.6; 95%CI -0.1; 1.3) and South (AAPC 0.0; 95%CI -0.5; 0.5) the trends were stationary, increasing in the Northeast (AAPC 0.6; 95%CI 0.3; 0.8) and in the Midwest (AAPC -1.3; 95%CI -1.5; -1.1), and decreasing in the Southeast (AAPC -0.9; 95%CI -1.4; -0.5). Regional differences indicate that public policies need to be improved regarding women's access to a health system that offers adequate prevention, screening and treatment through management strategies that include the most vulnerable population.
本研究的范围是描述1980年至2021年巴西及其各地区宫颈癌死亡率的长期趋势。这是一项基于统一卫生系统信息部现有数据的人群和生态研究,使用代码180和C53。计算了巴西和世界人口的粗死亡率、年龄别死亡率和年龄标准化死亡率。通过使用Joinpoint回归程序进行趋势分析获得平均年度百分比变化(AAPC),显著性水平为0.05,置信区间为95%(95%CI)。宫颈癌死亡病例有171,793例。在巴西(AAPC -0.3;CI95%-1.0;0.4)、北部(AAPC 0.6;95%CI -0.1;1.3)和南部(AAPC 0.0;95%CI -0.5;0.5)趋势平稳,东北部(AAPC 0.6;95%CI 0.3;0.8)和中西部(AAPC -1.3;95%CI -1.5;-1.1)呈上升趋势,东南部呈下降趋势(AAPC -0.9;95%CI -1.4;-0.5)。地区差异表明,需要通过包括最脆弱人群在内的管理策略,改善公共政策,使妇女能够更好地获得提供充分预防、筛查和治疗的卫生系统。