Suppr超能文献

围手术期青霉素和头孢菌素类抗生素过敏评估与检测:PREPARE试点随机临床试验

Perioperative Penicillin and Cephalosporin Antibiotic Allergy Assessment and Testing: The PREPARE Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

De Luca Joseph Francis, Vogrin Sara, Holmes Natasha Elizabeth, Reynolds Gemma Kate, Waldron Jamie Lee, Cox Fionnuala, Nazareth Justin, Guha Ranjan, Douglas Ned, Hardidge Andrew, Peel Trisha Nicole, Douglass Jo Anne, Johnson Douglas Forsyth, Trubiano Jason Anthony

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Centre of Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2025 May 1;160(5):518-525. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0279.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) impact patient health and perioperative outcomes. Antibiotic allergy delabeling could improve antibiotic prescribing and infection-related outcomes perioperatively.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of antibiotic allergy assessment and delabeling in anesthesiologist-led preoperative assessment clinics and expand delabeling efforts outside of specialist allergy clinics.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, phase 2 feasibility and safety trial conducted between December 14, 2020, and October 31, 2023, at outpatient preoperative anesthesiologist-led clinics at 3 tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were adults (age ≥18 years) with a reported β-lactam AAL likely to require intravenous antibiotic therapy for perioperative prophylaxis. Randomization was carried out on a 1:1 basis.

INTERVENTIONS

Enhanced allergy assessment by anesthesiologists using a smartphone application with a decision support algorithm adapted from a validated antibiotic allergy assessment tool. Risk scores guided antibiotic allergy testing: direct oral challenge (low risk) or skin testing followed by oral challenge (medium to high risk).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 2 primary feasibility outcomes were the proportion of patients randomized to intervention who received intervention per protocol and proportion of patients consenting to participate out of all eligible. The primary safety outcome was the proportion of the intervention group experiencing an antibiotic-associated adverse event (AE) within 90 days postsurgery.

RESULTS

Of 150 patients enrolled, 74 were randomly assigned to receive the intervention and 76 to control. The median age was 67 years (range, 28-89 years); 78 (52%) were female and 72 (48%) were male. For feasibility of recruitment, 150 of 511 patients (29.4%; 95% CI, 25.4%-33.5%) with eligible AALs were enrolled. For feasibility of intervention delivery, 47 of 74 patients (63.5%; 95% CI, 51.5%-74.4%) randomized to intervention had allergy testing; 28 of 30 patients (93%) assessed as low risk and 19 of 44 patients (43%) assessed as moderate/high risk proceeded to allergy testing. Antibiotic-related AE were reported in 4 of 74 intervention patients (5.4%, 95% CI, 1.5%-13.3%), 1 event was immune mediated (benign rash) without a delay to surgery. There was less restricted antibiotic use in the intervention group (6 patients; 10.7%) compared with the control group (10 patients; 17.9%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Low-risk β-lactam AAL were successfully evaluated and delabeled by anesthesiologists in the preoperative clinic using the intervention. The absence of severe AE after the intervention provides reassurance that antibiotic allergy delabeling can be achieved as part of a preoperative workup without delaying surgery and may improve the choice of preferred β-lactam prophylaxis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12620001295932.

摘要

重要性

抗生素过敏标签(AALs)会影响患者健康和围手术期结局。去除抗生素过敏标签可能会改善围手术期抗生素的处方情况及与感染相关的结局。

目的

评估在麻醉医生主导的术前评估诊所中进行抗生素过敏评估和去除标签的可行性及安全性,并将去除标签的工作扩展到专科过敏诊所之外。

设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床试验是一项多中心、2期可行性和安全性试验,于2020年12月14日至2023年10月31日在澳大利亚墨尔本的3家三级医院的门诊术前麻醉医生主导的诊所进行。参与者为年龄≥18岁、报告有β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签且围手术期预防可能需要静脉使用抗生素治疗的成年人。随机分组按1:1进行。

干预措施

麻醉医生使用一款智能手机应用程序进行强化过敏评估,该应用程序采用了源自经过验证的抗生素过敏评估工具的决策支持算法。风险评分指导抗生素过敏检测:直接口服激发试验(低风险)或皮肤试验后口服激发试验(中到高风险)。

主要结局和测量指标

2项主要可行性结局为按方案接受干预的随机分组至干预组的患者比例,以及所有符合条件的患者中同意参与的患者比例。主要安全性结局为干预组患者在术后90天内发生抗生素相关不良事件(AE)的比例。

结果

在150名入组患者中,74名被随机分配接受干预,76名被分配至对照组。中位年龄为67岁(范围28 - 89岁);78名(52%)为女性,72名(48%)为男性。就招募的可行性而言,511名有符合条件的抗生素过敏标签的患者中有150名(29.4%;95%置信区间,25.4% - 33.5%)被纳入。就干预实施的可行性而言,随机分组至干预组的74名患者中有47名(63.5%;95%置信区间,51.5% - 74.4%)进行了过敏检测;评估为低风险的30名患者中有28名(93%)以及评估为中/高风险的44名患者中有19名(43%)进行了过敏检测。74名干预组患者中有4名(5.4%,95%置信区间,1.5% - 13.3%)报告了抗生素相关不良事件,1例事件为免疫介导(良性皮疹),未导致手术延迟。与对照组(10名患者;17.9%)相比,干预组抗生素使用受限的情况较少(6名患者;10.7%)。

结论和相关性

麻醉医生在术前诊所使用该干预措施成功评估并去除了低风险β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签。干预后未出现严重不良事件,这让人放心,即作为术前检查的一部分去除抗生素过敏标签可以在不延迟手术的情况下实现,并且可能会改善首选β-内酰胺类预防药物的选择。

试验注册

anzctr.org.au标识符:ACTRN12620001295932

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验