Haghayegh Shahab, Hermida Ramon C, Smolensky Michael H, Jimenez Gallardo Mili, Duran-Aniotz Claudia, Slachevsky Andrea, Behrens Maria Isabel, Aguillon David, Santamaria-Garcia Hernando, García Adolfo M, Matallana Diana, Ibáñez Agustín, Hu Kun
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Clocks Sleep. 2025 Mar 6;7(1):11. doi: 10.3390/clockssleep7010011.
Growing evidence suggests that abnormal diurnal blood pressure rhythms may be associated with many adverse health outcomes, including increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. This study evaluates methodological aspects of research on bidirectional associations between ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) patterns and cognitive function. By examining the 28 recent studies included in a recent systematic review on the association between ABPM patterns with cognitive function and risk of dementia, our review revealed several significant limitations in study design, sample characteristics, ABPM protocol, cognitive assessment, and data analysis. The major concerns include a lack of diversity in study populations with underrepresentation of Blacks and Latinos, a predominant focus on Alzheimer's disease or all-cause dementia without distinguishing other dementia subtypes, different and not standardized measures of cognition or dementia, prevalent use of 24 h monitoring without considering the adaption effect, inconsistent definitions of dipping status, and ignorance of individual differences in timings of daily activities such as bed and awakening times. In addition, confounding variables such as class, dose, and timing of antihypertensive medication are inadequately controlled or considered. Further, longitudinal studies were scarce examining the bidirectional relationship between ABPM patterns and cognitive decline over time. Collectively, these deficiencies undermine the reliability and generalizability of current findings. Addressing these methodological challenges is crucial for a more comprehensive understanding of diurnal blood pressure rhythms in diverse populations and for developing an evidence-based guideline for ambulatory monitoring and control of blood pressure across the sleep-wake cycle to prevent cognitive decline and dementia.
越来越多的证据表明,异常的昼夜血压节律可能与许多不良健康后果相关,包括认知障碍和痴呆风险增加。本研究评估了动态血压监测(ABPM)模式与认知功能之间双向关联研究的方法学方面。通过审查最近一项关于ABPM模式与认知功能及痴呆风险关联的系统评价中纳入的28项近期研究,我们的综述揭示了研究设计、样本特征、ABPM方案、认知评估和数据分析中的几个重大局限性。主要问题包括研究人群缺乏多样性,黑人和拉丁裔代表性不足;主要关注阿尔茨海默病或全因性痴呆,未区分其他痴呆亚型;认知或痴呆的测量方法不同且不规范;普遍使用24小时监测而未考虑适应效应;血压波动状态的定义不一致;忽视了日常活动时间(如上床和起床时间)的个体差异。此外,抗高血压药物的类别、剂量和给药时间等混杂变量未得到充分控制或考虑。此外,很少有纵向研究考察ABPM模式与随时间推移的认知衰退之间的双向关系。总体而言,这些缺陷削弱了当前研究结果的可靠性和普遍性。应对这些方法学挑战对于更全面地了解不同人群的昼夜血压节律,以及制定基于证据的指南以在整个睡眠-觉醒周期中进行动态血压监测和控制,从而预防认知衰退和痴呆至关重要。