Liu Chang, Chamberlain Samuel, Ioannidis Konstantinos, Tiego Jeggan, Grant Jon, Yücel Murat, Hellyer Peter, Lochner Christine, Hampshire Adam, Albertella Lucy
School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 26;27:e66191. doi: 10.2196/66191.
The societal and public health costs of problematic use of the internet (PUI) are increasingly recognized as a concern across all age groups, presenting a growing challenge for mental health research. International scientific initiatives have emphasized the need to explore the potential roles of personality features in PUI. Compulsivity is a key personality trait associated with PUI and has been recognized by experts as a critical factor that should be prioritized in PUI research. Given that compulsivity is a multidimensional construct and PUI encompasses diverse symptoms, different underlying mechanisms are likely involved. However, the specific relationships between compulsivity dimensions and PUI symptoms remain unclear, limiting our understanding of compulsivity's role in PUI.
This study aimed to clarify the unique relationships among different dimensions of compulsivity, namely, perfectionism, reward drive, cognitive rigidity, and symptoms of PUI using a symptom-based network approach.
A regularized partial-correlation network was fitted using a large-scale sample from the United Kingdom. Bridge centrality analysis was conducted to identify bridge nodes within the network. Node predictability analysis was performed to assess the self-determination and controllability of the nodes within the network.
The sample comprised 122,345 individuals from the United Kingdom (51.4% female, age: mean 43.7, SD 16.5, range 9-86 years). The analysis identified several strong mechanistic relationships. The strongest positive intracluster edge was between reward drive and PUI4 (financial consequences due to internet use; weight=0.11). Meanwhile, the strongest negative intracluster edge was between perfectionism and PUI4 (financial consequences due to internet use; weight=0.04). Cognitive rigidity showed strong relationships with PUI2 (internet use for distress relief; weight=0.06) and PUI3 (internet use for loneliness or boredom; weight=0.07). Notably, reward drive (bridge expected influence=0.32) and cognitive rigidity (bridge expected influence=0.16) were identified as key bridge nodes, positively associated with PUI symptoms. Meanwhile, perfectionism exhibited a negative association with PUI symptoms (bridge expected influence=-0.05). The network's overall mean predictability was 0.37, with PUI6 (compulsion, predictability=0.55) showing the highest predictability.
The findings reveal distinct relationships between different dimensions of compulsivity and individual PUI symptoms, supporting the importance of choosing targeted interventions based on individual symptom profiles. In addition, the identified bridge nodes, reward drive, and cognitive rigidity may represent promising targets for PUI prevention and intervention and warrant further investigation.
互联网问题使用(PUI)的社会和公共卫生成本日益被视为所有年龄组都需关注的问题,这给心理健康研究带来了越来越大的挑战。国际科学倡议强调有必要探索人格特征在PUI中的潜在作用。强迫性是与PUI相关的关键人格特质,已被专家认可为PUI研究中应优先考虑的关键因素。鉴于强迫性是一个多维度的概念,且PUI包含多种症状,可能涉及不同的潜在机制。然而,强迫性维度与PUI症状之间的具体关系仍不明确,这限制了我们对强迫性在PUI中作用的理解。
本研究旨在使用基于症状的网络方法阐明强迫性的不同维度,即完美主义、奖励驱动、认知僵化与PUI症状之间的独特关系。
使用来自英国的大规模样本拟合正则化偏相关网络。进行桥接中心性分析以识别网络内的桥接节点。进行节点可预测性分析以评估网络内节点的自主性和可控性。
样本包括来自英国的122345名个体(51.4%为女性,年龄:平均43.7岁,标准差16.5,范围9 - 86岁)。分析确定了几种强大的机制关系。集群内最强的正边是奖励驱动与PUI4(因互联网使用导致的财务后果;权重 = 0.11)之间的边。同时,集群内最强的负边是完美主义与PUI4(因互联网使用导致的财务后果;权重 = 0.04)之间的边。认知僵化与PUI2(为缓解痛苦而使用互联网;权重 = 0.06)和PUI3(为排解孤独或无聊而使用互联网;权重 = 0.07)显示出强关系。值得注意的是,奖励驱动(桥接预期影响 = 0.32)和认知僵化(桥接预期影响 = 0.16)被确定为关键桥接节点,与PUI症状呈正相关。同时,完美主义与PUI症状呈负相关(桥接预期影响 = -0.05)。网络的总体平均可预测性为0.37,其中PUI6(强迫行为,可预测性 = 0.55)显示出最高的可预测性。
研究结果揭示了强迫性的不同维度与个体PUI症状之间的独特关系,支持了根据个体症状特征选择针对性干预措施的重要性。此外,确定的桥接节点、奖励驱动和认知僵化可能代表了PUI预防和干预的有希望的目标,值得进一步研究。