School of Psychology, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Israel.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):77-85. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2998.
Dimensional definitions of transdiagnostic mental health problems have been suggested as an alternative to categorical diagnoses, having the advantage of capturing heterogeneity within diagnostic categories and similarity across them and bridging more naturally psychological and neural substrates.
To examine whether a self-reported compulsivity dimension has a stronger association with goal-directed and related higher-order cognitive deficits compared with a diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, patients with OCD and/or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) from across the United States completed a telephone-based diagnostic interview by a trained rater, internet-based cognitive testing, and self-reported clinical assessments from October 8, 2015, to October 1, 2017. Follow-up data were collected to test for replicability.
Performance was measured on a test of goal-directed planning and cognitive flexibility (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test [WCST]) and a test of abstract reasoning. Clinical variables included DSM-5 diagnosis of OCD and GAD and 3 psychiatric symptom dimensions (general distress, compulsivity, and obsessionality) derived from a factor analysis.
Of 285 individuals in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 32 [12] years; age range, 18-77 years; 219 [76.8%] female), 111 had OCD; 82, GAD; and 92, OCD and GAD. A diagnosis of OCD was not associated with goal-directed performance compared with GAD at baseline (β [SE], -0.02 [0.02]; P = .18). In contrast, a compulsivity dimension was negatively associated with goal-directed performance (β [SE], -0.05 [0.02]; P = .003). Results for abstract reasoning task and WCST mirrored this pattern; the compulsivity dimension was associated with abstract reasoning (β [SE], 2.99 [0.63]; P < .001) and several indicators of WCST performance (eg, categories completed: β [SE], -0.57 [0.09]; P < .001), whereas OCD diagnosis was not (abstract reasoning: β [SE], 0.39 [0.66]; P = .56; categories completed: β [SE], -0.09 [0.10]; P = .38). Other symptom dimensions relevant to OCD, obsessionality, and general distress had no reliable association with goal-directed performance, WCST, or abstract reasoning. Obsessionality had a positive association with requiring more trials to reach the first category on the WCST at baseline (β [SE], 2.92 [1.39]; P = .04), and general distress was associated with impaired goal-directed performance at baseline (β [SE],-0.04 [0.02]; P = .01). However, unlike the key results of this study, neither survived correction for multiple comparisons or was replicated at follow-up testing.
Deficits in goal-directed planning in OCD may be more strongly associated with a compulsivity dimension than with OCD diagnosis. This result may have implications for research assessing the association between brain mechanisms and clinical manifestations and for understanding the structure of mental illness.
与分类诊断相比,跨诊断心理健康问题的维度定义被认为是一种替代方法,它具有捕捉诊断类别内部异质性和类别之间相似性的优势,并更自然地连接心理和神经基础。
检验与强迫症(OCD)诊断相比,自我报告的强迫维度是否与目标导向和相关的高阶认知缺陷有更强的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项横断面研究中,来自美国各地的 OCD 和/或广泛性焦虑症(GAD)患者通过经过培训的评估员进行电话诊断访谈、基于互联网的认知测试和自我报告的临床评估,完成了从 2015 年 10 月 8 日到 2017 年 10 月 1 日的数据收集。进行了随访数据收集以测试可重复性。
使用目标导向计划和认知灵活性测试(威斯康星卡片分类测试[WCST])和抽象推理测试来衡量表现。临床变量包括 DSM-5 强迫症和 GAD 诊断以及从因子分析中得出的 3 个精神病症状维度(一般困扰、强迫性和强迫观念)。
在分析中的 285 名个体中(平均[SD]年龄为 32[12]岁;年龄范围为 18-77 岁;219[76.8%]为女性),111 名患有 OCD;82 名患有 GAD;92 名患有 OCD 和 GAD。与 GAD 相比,OCD 诊断基线时与目标导向表现无关(β[SE],-0.02[0.02];P = .18)。相比之下,强迫维度与目标导向表现呈负相关(β[SE],-0.05[0.02];P = .003)。抽象推理任务和 WCST 的结果反映了这种模式;强迫维度与抽象推理(β[SE],2.99[0.63];P < .001)和 WCST 表现的几个指标相关(例如,完成的类别:β[SE],-0.57[0.09];P < .001),而 OCD 诊断则没有(抽象推理:β[SE],0.39[0.66];P = .56;完成的类别:β[SE],-0.09[0.10];P = .38)。与 OCD 相关的其他症状维度,强迫观念和一般困扰,与目标导向表现、WCST 或抽象推理没有可靠的关联。强迫观念与 WCST 基线时首次达到第一个类别所需的试验次数呈正相关(β[SE],2.92[1.39];P = .04),一般困扰与基线时的目标导向表现受损有关(β[SE],-0.04[0.02];P = .01)。然而,与本研究的主要结果不同,这些结果都没有通过多次比较校正或在随访测试中得到复制。
OCD 中目标导向计划的缺陷可能与强迫维度的关联比与 OCD 诊断的关联更强。该结果可能对评估大脑机制与临床表现之间的关联以及理解精神疾病结构的研究具有重要意义。