Suppr超能文献

用于制造皮肤组织工程产品及其他皮肤科治疗的血浆、纤维蛋白原或纤维蛋白生物材料:一项系统综述

Blood Plasma, Fibrinogen or Fibrin Biomaterial for the Manufacturing of Skin Tissue-Engineered Products and Other Dermatological Treatments: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sierra-Sánchez Álvaro, Sanabria-de la Torre Raquel, Ubago-Rodríguez Ana, Quiñones-Vico María I, Montero-Vílchez Trinidad, Sánchez-Díaz Manuel, Arias-Santiago Salvador

机构信息

Unidad de Producción Celular e Ingeniería Tisular, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Andalusian Network of Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies, 18014 Granada, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Funct Biomater. 2025 Feb 22;16(3):79. doi: 10.3390/jfb16030079.

Abstract

The use of blood plasma, fibrinogen or fibrin, a natural biomaterial, has been widely studied for the development of different skin tissue-engineered products and other dermatological treatments. This systematic review reports the preclinical and clinical studies which use it alone or combined with other biomaterials and/or cells for the treatment of several dermatological conditions. Following the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines, 147 preclinical studies have revealed that the use of this biomaterial as a wound dressing or as a monolayer (one cell type) skin substitute are the preferred strategies, mainly for the treatment of excisional or surgical wounds. Moreover, blood plasma is mainly used alone although its combination with other biomaterials such as agarose, polyethylene glycol or collagen has also been reported to increase its wound healing potential. However, most of the 17 clinical reviewed evaluated its use for the treatment of severely burned patients as a wound dressing or bilayer (two cell types) skin substitute. Although the number of preclinical studies evaluating the use of blood plasma as a dermatological treatment has increased during the last fifteen years, this has not been correlated with a wide variety of clinical studies. Its safety and wound healing potential have been proved; however, the lack of a standard model and the presence of several approaches have meant that its translation to a clinical environment is still limited. A higher number of clinical studies should be carried out in the coming years to set a standard wound healing strategy for each dermatological disease.

摘要

血浆、纤维蛋白原或纤维蛋白作为一种天然生物材料,已被广泛研究用于开发不同的皮肤组织工程产品和其他皮肤病治疗方法。本系统评价报告了单独使用或与其他生物材料和/或细胞联合使用以治疗多种皮肤病的临床前和临床研究。遵循PRISMA 2020指南,147项临床前研究表明,将这种生物材料用作伤口敷料或单层(一种细胞类型)皮肤替代物是首选策略,主要用于治疗切除性或手术伤口。此外,血浆主要单独使用,尽管也有报道称其与其他生物材料如琼脂糖、聚乙二醇或胶原蛋白联合使用可增强其伤口愈合潜力。然而,在17项临床综述中,大多数评估了其作为伤口敷料或双层(两种细胞类型)皮肤替代物用于治疗严重烧伤患者的情况。尽管在过去十五年中,评估血浆作为皮肤病治疗方法的临床前研究数量有所增加,但这与广泛的临床研究并无关联。其安全性和伤口愈合潜力已得到证实;然而,缺乏标准模型和多种方法的存在意味着其向临床环境的转化仍然有限。未来几年应开展更多的临床研究,为每种皮肤病制定标准的伤口愈合策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0fe/11942893/5a26cea393b2/jfb-16-00079-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验