• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态对比增强计算机断层扫描中肝癌肿瘤直径和密度测量的变异性

Variability of HCC Tumor Diameter and Density Measurements on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

作者信息

Guha Siddharth, Ibrahim Abdalla, Geng Pengfei, Wu Qian, Chou Yen, Akin Oguz, Schwartz Lawrence H, Xie Chuan-Miao, Zhao Binsheng

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Tomography. 2025 Mar 19;11(3):36. doi: 10.3390/tomography11030036.

DOI:10.3390/tomography11030036
PMID:40137576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11946049/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In cancers imaged using contrast-enhanced protocols, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), formal guidelines rely on measurements of lesion size (in mm) and radiographic density (in Hounsfield units [HU]) to evaluate response to treatment. However, the variability of these measurements across different contrast enhancement phases remains poorly understood. This limits the ability of clinicians to discern whether measurement changes are accurate.

METHODS

In this study, we investigated the variability of maximal lesion diameter and mean lesion density of HCC lesions on CT scans across four different contrast enhancement phases: non-contrast-enhanced phase (NCE), early arterial phase (E-AP), late arterial phase (L-AP), and portal venous phase (PVP). HCC lesions were independently segmented by two expert radiologists. For each pair of a lesion's scan timepoints, one was selected randomly as the baseline measurement and the other as the repeat measurement. Both absolute and relative differences in measurements were calculated, as were the coefficients of variance (CVs). Analysis was further stratified by both contrast enhancement phase and lesion diameter.

RESULTS

Lesion diameter was found to have a CV of 5.11% (95% CI: 4.20-6.01%). About a fifth of the measurement's relative changes were greater than 10%. Although there was no significant difference in diameter measurements across different phases, there was a significant negative correlation (R = -0.303, -value = 0.030) between lesion diameter and percent difference in diameter measurement. Lesion density measurements varied significantly across all phases, with the greatest relative difference of 47% in the late arterial phase and a CV of 22.84% (21.48-24.20%). The overall CV for lesion density measurements was 26.19% (24.66-27.72%).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in tumor diameter measurements within 10% may simply be due to variability, and lesion density is highly sensitive to contrast timing. This highlights the importance of paying attention to these two variables when evaluating tumor response in both clinical trials and practice.

摘要

目的

在使用对比增强方案成像的癌症中,如肝细胞癌(HCC),正式指南依靠测量病变大小(以毫米为单位)和放射密度(以亨氏单位[HU]为单位)来评估治疗反应。然而,这些测量在不同对比增强阶段的变异性仍知之甚少。这限制了临床医生辨别测量变化是否准确的能力。

方法

在本研究中,我们调查了HCC病变在CT扫描上四个不同对比增强阶段的最大病变直径和平均病变密度的变异性:非对比增强期(NCE)、动脉早期(E-AP)、动脉晚期(L-AP)和门静脉期(PVP)。HCC病变由两位放射科专家独立分割。对于病变的每对扫描时间点,随机选择一个作为基线测量,另一个作为重复测量。计算测量的绝对和相对差异以及变异系数(CV)。分析进一步按对比增强阶段和病变直径分层。

结果

发现病变直径的CV为5.11%(95%CI:4.20 - 6.01%)。约五分之一的测量相对变化大于10%。尽管不同阶段的直径测量无显著差异,但病变直径与直径测量百分比差异之间存在显著负相关(R = -0.303,P值 = 0.030)。病变密度测量在所有阶段均有显著变化,动脉晚期的最大相对差异为47%,CV为22.84%(21.48 - 24.20%)。病变密度测量的总体CV为26.19%(24.66 - 27.72%)。

结论

10%以内的肿瘤直径测量变化可能仅仅是由于变异性,并且病变密度对对比剂注射时间高度敏感。这突出了在临床试验和实践中评估肿瘤反应时关注这两个变量的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/162e862968b2/tomography-11-00036-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/60813afe183e/tomography-11-00036-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/3eee912b7658/tomography-11-00036-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/584a5a347970/tomography-11-00036-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/5dbe73e87fd6/tomography-11-00036-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/df92f046a250/tomography-11-00036-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/162e862968b2/tomography-11-00036-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/60813afe183e/tomography-11-00036-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/3eee912b7658/tomography-11-00036-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/584a5a347970/tomography-11-00036-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/5dbe73e87fd6/tomography-11-00036-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/df92f046a250/tomography-11-00036-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e2/11946049/162e862968b2/tomography-11-00036-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Variability of HCC Tumor Diameter and Density Measurements on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.动态对比增强计算机断层扫描中肝癌肿瘤直径和密度测量的变异性
Tomography. 2025 Mar 19;11(3):36. doi: 10.3390/tomography11030036.
2
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.超声造影使用声诺维®(六氟化硫微泡)与对比增强计算机断层扫描和对比增强磁共振成像在局灶性肝脏病变的特征描述和肝转移检测中的比较:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160.
3
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.对比增强超声在慢性肝病成人肝细胞癌诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 2;9(9):CD013483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013483.pub2.
4
Percutaneous ethanol injection or percutaneous acetic acid injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma.经皮乙醇注射或经皮乙酸注射治疗早期肝细胞癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1(1):CD006745. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006745.pub3.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Do Hounsfield Units From Intraoperative CT Scans Correlate With Preoperative Values?术中 CT 扫描的 Hounsfield 单位与术前值相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1885-1892. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003122. Epub 2024 May 9.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Management of people with early- or very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: an attempted network meta-analysis.早期或极早期肝细胞癌患者的管理:一项网络荟萃分析尝试
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 28;3(3):CD011650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011650.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Image Acquisition Parameters and ComBat Harmonization on the Predictive Performance of Radiomics: A Renal Cell Carcinoma Model.图像采集参数和ComBat归一化对影像组学预测性能的影响:肾细胞癌模型
Appl Sci (Basel). 2022 Oct;12(19). doi: 10.3390/app12199824. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
2
Applying artificial intelligence technology to assist with breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction.应用人工智能技术辅助乳腺癌诊断及预后预测。
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 31;12:980793. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980793. eCollection 2022.
3
Reproducibility of CT-Based Hepatocellular Carcinoma Radiomic Features across Different Contrast Imaging Phases: A Proof of Concept on SORAMIC Trial Data.
基于CT的肝细胞癌影像组学特征在不同对比成像阶段的可重复性:基于SORAMIC试验数据的概念验证
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 16;13(18):4638. doi: 10.3390/cancers13184638.
4
Imaging biomarkers for evaluating tumor response: RECIST and beyond.用于评估肿瘤反应的影像生物标志物:RECIST及其他。
Biomark Res. 2021 Jul 2;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40364-021-00306-8.
5
Evaluation of Continuous Tumor-Size-Based End Points as Surrogates for Overall Survival in Randomized Clinical Trials in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.基于连续肿瘤大小的终点评估在转移性结直肠癌随机临床试验中作为总生存期替代终点的价值。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911750. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11750.
6
Impact of Variability in Portal Venous Phase Acquisition Timing in Tumor Density Measurement and Treatment Response Assessment: Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as a Paradigm.门静脉期采集时间变异性对肿瘤密度测量及治疗反应评估的影响:以转移性结直肠癌为例
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2017 Nov;1:1-8. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00108.
7
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)2018 版:高危患者肝细胞癌的影像学表现。
Radiology. 2018 Dec;289(3):816-830. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181494. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
8
Immuno-oncology Trial Endpoints: Capturing Clinically Meaningful Activity.免疫肿瘤学试验终点:捕捉具有临床意义的活性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):4959-4969. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3065.
9
Decrease in tumor enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT is associated with improved survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with Sorafenib.在接受索拉非尼治疗的肝细胞癌患者中,对比增强CT上肿瘤强化程度的降低与生存率提高相关。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;46(9):839-44. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw078. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors.实体瘤中的假性进展与免疫相关反应
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3541-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6870. Epub 2015 Aug 10.