Ko Ching-Chung, Yeh Lee-Ren, Kuo Yu-Ting, Chen Jeon-Hor
Department of Medical Imaging, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
Biomark Res. 2021 Jul 2;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40364-021-00306-8.
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is the gold standard for assessment of treatment response in solid tumors. Morphologic change of tumor size evaluated by RECIST is often correlated with survival length and has been considered as a surrogate endpoint of therapeutic efficacy. However, the detection of morphologic change alone may not be sufficient for assessing response to new anti-cancer medication in all solid tumors. During the past fifteen years, several molecular-targeted therapies and immunotherapies have emerged in cancer treatment which work by disrupting signaling pathways and inhibited cell growth. Tumor necrosis or lack of tumor progression is associated with a good therapeutic response even in the absence of tumor shrinkage. Therefore, the use of unmodified RECIST criteria to estimate morphological changes of tumor alone may not be sufficient to estimate tumor response for these new anti-cancer drugs. Several studies have reported the low reliability of RECIST in evaluating treatment response in different tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, prostate cancer, brain glioma, bone metastasis, and lymphoma. There is an increased need for new medical imaging biomarkers, considering the changes in tumor viability, metabolic activity, and attenuation, which are related to early tumor response. Promising imaging techniques, beyond RECIST, include dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weight imaging (DWI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). This review outlines the current RECIST with their limitations and the new emerging concepts of imaging biomarkers in oncology.
实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)是评估实体瘤治疗反应的金标准。通过RECIST评估的肿瘤大小形态变化通常与生存长度相关,并被视为治疗效果的替代终点。然而,仅检测形态变化可能不足以评估所有实体瘤对新型抗癌药物的反应。在过去的十五年中,癌症治疗中出现了几种分子靶向疗法和免疫疗法,它们通过破坏信号通路和抑制细胞生长来发挥作用。即使在肿瘤没有缩小的情况下,肿瘤坏死或缺乏肿瘤进展也与良好的治疗反应相关。因此,仅使用未修改的RECIST标准来估计肿瘤的形态变化可能不足以评估这些新型抗癌药物的肿瘤反应。几项研究报告了RECIST在评估不同肿瘤(如肝细胞癌、肺癌、前列腺癌、脑胶质瘤、骨转移瘤和淋巴瘤)治疗反应方面的低可靠性。考虑到与早期肿瘤反应相关的肿瘤活力、代谢活性和衰减的变化,对新的医学影像生物标志物的需求日益增加。除了RECIST之外,有前景的成像技术包括动态对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)、磁共振波谱(MRS)和氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)。本综述概述了当前的RECIST及其局限性以及肿瘤学中影像生物标志物的新兴概念。