Hayes William K, Gren Eric C K, Nelsen David R, Corbit Aaron G, Cooper Allen M, Fox Gerad A, Streit M Benjamin
Department of Earth and Biological Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA.
Bitterroot College, University of Montana, Hamilton, MT 59840, USA.
Toxins (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;17(3):99. doi: 10.3390/toxins17030099.
Numerous organisms, including animals, plants, fungi, protists, and bacteria, rely on toxins to meet their needs. Biological toxins have been classified into three groups: poisons transferred passively without a delivery mechanism; toxungens delivered to the body surface without an accompanying wound; and venoms conveyed to internal tissues via the creation of a wound. The distinctions highlight the evolutionary pathways by which toxins acquire specialized functions. Heretofore, the term venom has been largely restricted to animals. However, careful consideration reveals a surprising diversity of organisms that deploy toxic secretions via strategies remarkably analogous to those of venomous animals. Numerous plants inject toxins and pathogenic microorganisms into animals through stinging trichomes, thorns, spines, prickles, raphides, and silica needles. Some plants protect themselves via ants as venomous symbionts. Certain fungi deliver toxins via hyphae into infected hosts for nutritional and/or defensive purposes. Fungi can possess penetration structures, sometimes independent of the hyphae, that create a wound to facilitate toxin delivery. Some protists discharge harpoon-like extrusomes (toxicysts and nematocysts) that penetrate their prey and deliver toxins. Many bacteria possess secretion systems or contractile injection systems that can introduce toxins into targets via wounds. Viruses, though not "true" organisms according to many, include a group (the bacteriophages) which can inject nucleic acids and virion proteins into host cells that inflict damage rivaling that of conventional venoms. Collectively, these examples suggest that venom delivery systems-and even toxungen delivery systems, which we briefly address-are much more widespread than previously recognized. Thus, our understanding of venom as an evolutionary novelty has focused on only a small proportion of venomous organisms. With regard to this widespread form of toxin deployment, the words of the Sherman Brothers in Disney's iconic tune, , could hardly be more apt: "There's so much that we share, that it's time we're aware, it's a small world after all".
包括动物、植物、真菌、原生生物和细菌在内的众多生物体都依赖毒素来满足自身需求。生物毒素已被分为三类:无传递机制而被动转移的毒物;无伴随伤口而输送至体表的毒素;以及通过造成伤口而输送至内部组织的毒液。这些区别凸显了毒素获得特殊功能的进化途径。迄今为止,“毒液”一词在很大程度上仅限于动物。然而,仔细考量会发现,有一类生物体令人惊讶,它们通过与有毒动物极为相似的策略来分泌毒素。许多植物通过刺毛、刺、棘、皮刺、针晶和硅质针等结构将毒素和致病微生物注入动物体内。一些植物通过作为有毒共生体的蚂蚁来保护自己。某些真菌通过菌丝将毒素输送到受感染的宿主中,以获取营养和/或进行防御。真菌可能拥有穿透结构,有时独立于菌丝,这些结构会造成伤口以利于毒素输送。一些原生生物会释放出类似鱼叉的刺丝囊(刺细胞和刺丝囊),这些刺丝囊会穿透猎物并输送毒素。许多细菌拥有分泌系统或收缩注射系统,能够通过伤口将毒素引入目标细胞。病毒,尽管按照许多人的定义它并非“真正的”生物体,但其中有一类(噬菌体)能够将核酸和病毒粒子蛋白注入宿主细胞,其造成的损害可与传统毒液相媲美。总体而言,这些例子表明,毒液输送系统——甚至我们简要提及的毒素输送系统——比以前认为的要广泛得多。因此,我们将毒液视为一种进化新特征的理解仅聚焦于一小部分有毒生物体。对于这种广泛存在的毒素部署形式,迪士尼标志性歌曲《小小世界》中谢尔曼兄弟的歌词再贴切不过了:“我们共享的如此之多,是时候我们意识到,毕竟这是一个小小世界” 。